User talk:Anisurwiki

March 2022

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Please refrain from hijacking pages as you did with The News Today (Bangladesh). Should you believe the subject you were writing about deserves an article, please use the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Also see Wikipedia's disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Politanvm ^talk 03:28, 21 March 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.162.31.191 (talk) [reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Anisurwiki, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:18, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I am interested Anisurwiki (talk) 12:57, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Please refrain from hijacking pages as you did with The News Today (Bangladesh). Should you believe the subject you were writing about deserves an article, please use the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Also see Wikipedia's disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 06:48, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Draft:M.A Rahman. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Politanvm ^talk 01:37, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed promotional content. Please check again Anisurwiki (talk) 14:08, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have made no edits to the page since this last message. I very strongly recommend reading Help:Introduction and Help:Policy, learning to edit Wikipedia constructively, and stopping using Wikipedia for promotion. There are a number of guidelines and policies you appear to be breaking:

WP:UPE (Undisclosed Paid Editing): Based on your username and information you've posted, it appears you're financially connected to The Daily News Star. If you are connected with it, you must disclose the conflict of interest. Even then, you are strongly discouraged from directly editing in that topic
WP:PROMO: All of your edits appear intended to promote a particular company or individual.
WP:EDITWAR: Repeatedly moving draft articles against consensus could be considered edit warring. Please stop trying to bypass consensus and new page reviews.
(Possibly) WP:SOCKPUPPET: There is another user account making very similar edits and moves related to "The Daily News Star". If you are personally using multiple accounts to try and bypass guidelines and policies, or if you are directing/working with someone else to do so (WP:MEATPUPPET), you must stop.

Please read through these policies closely. Breaking these policies may lead to a block. Best, Politanvm ^talk 15:30, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anisurwiki. Thank you. Politanvm ^talk 20:36, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All is not my account. Anisur only my account others one my friend account. We are both new to this platform. We made a lot of mistakes. Please give us a last chance. Thank you Anisurwiki (talk) 20:58, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove this report. I promised you would never see it again. I will follow wiki all policy next time. Please remove this report Anisurwiki (talk) 21:15, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please give us last chance. Anisurwiki (talk) 21:22, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: M.A Rahman (March 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Entirety of "Personal life" section is unsourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:M.A Rahman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:M.A Rahman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 22:33, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I removed unsourced content. Please check again Anisurwiki (talk) 14:09, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:

{{unblock|reason=Hi, I am new wikipedia. I know i made lot of mistake. conflict of interest, move page, hijacking page. I read policy and understand now. Please give me last another chance, Would you never see this mistake again. Thanks}}

. Bbb23 (talk) 21:33, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anisurwiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I am new wikipedia. I know i made lot of mistake. Please give me last another chance, Would you never see this mistake again. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anisurwiki (talk • contribs)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --Blablubbs (talk) 01:16, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Anisurwiki. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Special emphasis on WP:PAID. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:33, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. Thank you Anisurwiki (talk) 22:37, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

proposed unblock conditions

Please address the following unblock conditions

No coordinating of edits off Wiki with anyone else.
No hijacking of existing articles.
No editing about
- Draft:M.A Rahman ‎
- Draft:Daily News Today Limited ‎
- Draft:Tasnuva Tisha
- Draft:Anisur Rahman Niloy
- Draft:Arfin Xunayed

or any other subject with which you have an off-Wiki connection.

Read and heed WP:PAID.
All new page creation via WP:AfC. No moving of drafts to article space.
No page moves.
No wp:EDITWARRING.
No promotional editing
Please describe what constructive edits you would make.

addendumTo clarify, no sharing of accounts and no editing with more than one account.

Any other admin may add to these as they see fit. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:42, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: First, the user has not even acknowledged the socking. This was not a "coordinating of edits" but one person using two accounts. Second, anyone who has to abide by so many conditions should not be unblocked. Finally, I would oppose an unblock.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:22, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: Thanks. These are just proposed as a starting point. I expect others will probably add more as needed. I would just not want them reduced. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:56, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will do not those. Thank you Anisurwiki (talk) 23:45, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: M.A Rahman (March 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Worldbruce was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Prothom Alo is dead, Bangla Tribune is mainly quotes from him, The Daily Star is a passing mention, The Bangladesh Today is him talking about his music, and Jugantor doesn't mention him. Sources of these types do not contribute to establishing notability. Wikipedia may not be used for any type of promotion, publicity, or public relations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:M.A Rahman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:M.A Rahman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Worldbruce (talk) 01:14, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Daily News Today Limited

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Daily News Today Limited, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 03:42, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Daily News Today Limited

Hello, Anisurwiki. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daily News Today Limited, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Daily News Today Limited

Hello, Anisurwiki. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Daily News Today Limited".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:50, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]