User talk:AnnalisaShanghai

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

AnnalisaShanghai (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

AnnalisaShanghai (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Decline reason:

You must choose a different username from your current one. — Tiptoety ^talk 01:44, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

User was blocked as User:Labbrand, and the name changed but the block was carried with it. Article is at Labbrand

Request handled by: Step hen 02:24, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing admins: I honestly do not see a huge issue here..and am tempted to unblock the user. After looking over their contributions it appears they may have been blocked for having a advert like username so maybe having them change it would be a good way to go. Thoughts? Tiptoety ^talk 01:44, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd support an unblock, as I'm frankly a bit confused why the editor was blocked to begin with. Maybe I'm being really dense, but I don't see the violation. - auburnpilot talk 01:58, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I left a note with the blocking administrator. Before I unblock, I would like to hear from him. Tiptoety ^talk 02:07, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, apparently this was just a case of bad timing. Orangemike must not have noticed AnnalisaShanghai (as Labbrand) had already submitted the name change when he placed the block. - auburnpilot talk 02:30, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That seems plausable, as the block under this username did not. Tiptoety ^talk 02:34, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Labbrand-RGBlogo.jpg.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Labbrand-RGBlogo.jpg.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:08, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spamming[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Branding agency ‎ , you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing their websites from appearing on Wikipedia. Kuru ^talk 11:42, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Labbrand-Logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Labbrand-Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:34, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]