User talk:Anonymous6348

Anonymous6348, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Anonymous6348! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

A Anonymous6348 (talk) 16:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

how i can be a adminstrator

Anonymous6348 (talk) 20:01, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 19:36, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ok,,,,go to hell Anonymous6348 (talk) 19:45, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Monohardi Degree College moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Monohardi Degree College, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MarginalCost (talk) 20:22, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at En passant, you may be blocked from editing. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 20:24, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page 2005 Azores subtropical storm. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use your sandbox instead, as someone could see your edit before you revert it. You have made an incredible mess of the edit history of this article. Please stop this. DBaK (talk) 21:42, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Quale (talk) 03:33, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 04:06, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anonymous6348 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i was just experimenting i didn't have any intention of destruction

Decline reason:

You vandalised repeatedly. You're going to have to come up with a better unblock appeal than "ooops".Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:56, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:03, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]