User talk:Antariksha25

Antariksha25, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Antariksha25! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Antariksha25, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Ravensfire (talk) 21:57, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to my talk page

I trust that this edit was somehow a really odd, tragic mistake that you absolutely didn't mean to make and save. Ravensfire (talk) 22:06, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Hello, I'm Dan Koehl. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Dan Koehl (talk) 22:34, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 22:37, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You are beyond 3 reverts over this, and you will end up blocked if you continue to revert. You need to STOP reverting the article and START a discussion on the article talk page. If you revert again, you will be reported to the edit-war noticeboard. Ravensfire (talk) 22:43, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tanushree Dutta has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tanushree Dutta was changed by Antariksha25 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.872517 on 2018-10-18T22:01:30+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:01, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Tanushree Dutta, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:07, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Tanushree Dutta. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:12, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:12, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]