User talk:AntonV

Welcome!

Hello AntonV, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Reconsider ! 02:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, AntonV. You have new messages at WP:FEED#Environment_and_Urbanization.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Chevy monte carlo - alt 05:25, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talback: Journals

Hello, AntonV. You have new messages at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Academic_Journals#Conflicts_of_Interest_and_academic_journals_template.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 19:05, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there AntonV, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:AntonV/Irish Theological Quarterly. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

See a log of files removed today here.

Shut off the bot here.

Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:01, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Irish_Theological_Quarterly_cover.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:Irish_Theological_Quarterly_cover.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 05:30, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Journal infoboxes

Hi Anton, thanks for your good work creating journal articles and improving existing ones. Just two short notes: infoboxes go on top of a page and the "country" parameter should only be filled in if a journal really has strong and clear ties to a particular country. For instance, although SAGE may be based in the UK, it's a bit strange to put "United Kingdom" for Theology Today, which is published by SAGE on behalf of a US institution. These are just details, keep up the good work! --Crusio (talk) 14:54, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Crusio - that makes sense, will bear that in mind in future. AntonV (talk) 14:47, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please also be aware that a page which consists only of an infobox, with no actual body text, is not a completed article — if you want to start a page about an academic journal that doesn't have one yet, you need to add at least the beginnings of an article in addition to the infobox. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 05:27, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is it ok to have these infobox-only entries as part of my userspace? I plan to flesh them out as proper articles in due course - I don't think I've published any infobox-only entries in the mainspace (I certainly haven't intended to do so). Thanks Bearcat! AntonV (talk) 14:47, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, just seen that I didn't create some of the pages correctly in my userspace, sorry! Will complete the entries now (Contemporary Sociology (journal), Comparative Political Studies, Clinical and Applied Thrombosis-Hemostasis, Biological Research For Nursing and Applied Psychological Measurement - I'm hoping that's it).AntonV (talk) 14:56, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anton, let me also thank you for your work. I have redirected almost all of your userspace drafts to the edition of the page in mainspace, so that your userspace doesnt unnecessarily add items to Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Infobox journal and stale data into search results. They are all still at Special:PrefixIndex/User:AntonV/, and you can undo my redirect if you wish to resume editing the draft. There are only three which do not have a 'published' article on Wikipedia, being d:Q15710224, d:Q15710222 and d:Q15710197. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 08:30, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:11, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

see my comments there. The nominator could not be more mistaken about the practice here with these articles. I see no objection at all to your editing, and will defend it. I shall follow your work,and move all your user space article to mainspace when you have finished them, provided they meet the requirements of being indexed by the major services, which is not necessarily the case for all Sage titles. The main information you need to add is the successive editors in chief, with links to their articles in Wikipedia if they have them (and they should, for being editor in chief of a major scientific journal is an accepted criterion for notability of a scientist--see WP:PROF), the impact factors from JCR if they are covered, and a full list of the major indexing services that include them--that means SCI/SSCI and Scopus if they apply, and then the major service in the specialty. It also helps to give a list of the 4 or 5 most cited articles, using either ISI or Scopus. It's absurd that you should need to do this indirectly to escape misinformed criticism. There is actually no rule against editing in mainspace with a conflict of interest, provided you do it properly and objectively. anyone who tells you otherwise has not actually read and understood WP:COI -- a proposal to prohibit such editing has been sometimes suggested, and always rejected, because a/ we have no way of enforcing it, and b/ about half the good articles on organizations and products and people in WP have been written by people with COI.

What I normally tell people about the sort of article is :

Based on what is generally accepted here, an article about a journal should also contain:

Full titles, any earlier titles, and the corresponding dates. Make cross references from any variant titles.
Standard abbreviations used--make redirects from them.
publishing & sponsoring body, as well as earlier publishers & sponsors
availability on line
no. of articles published a year
ISSNs for both print and online versions
Online availability of current and earlier issues
Open access availability, if relevant.
Circulation (sourced somewhere--default place to get it is Ulrichs)
coverage in major standard indexes, inclding particularly Scopus and Web of Science (Science Citation Index)
latest year's impact factor if available, and rank in the JCR subject field(s). Include the year so it can be updated.
any actual references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases.
a list of the 3 or 4 most influential articles similarly, getting citation figures from Web of Science.
External links to the journal's main web site, and , if relevant, the main website of the sponsoring body.

It should not contain

General information listing all the fields covered, unless it is not obvious from the title
Statements of praise for the journal -- see WP:PEACOCK
A list of those on the editorial board
names of the staff, except editors in chief; subordinate or section editors should not usually be listed.
Information about subscription prices
Information about how to submit articles
Links to the publisher's general website, or to subpages within the journal's site.
and, most important, it must contain no text from the web page description of the journal. That is a copyright violation, and needs to be rewritten. Even if you are prepared to donate copyright according to WP:DCM, it is likely to be unsuitably promotional.

For more specific information our Wikipedia:WikiProject Academic Journals/Writing guide. As it specifies there, the best way to start is by using the infobox journal template; but also convert the information there to prose. DGG ( talk ) 04:15, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Human Relations cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Human Relations cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:49, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources - cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources - cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:38, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Public Relations Inquiry

The article Public Relations Inquiry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, relatively new, academic journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 11:08, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SAGE Publications logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SAGE Publications logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Concurrent Engineering (journal)

The article Concurrent Engineering (journal) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable, no sources found

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:16, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Concurrent Engineering cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Concurrent Engineering cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Autism journal cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Autism journal cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]