User talk:AnujRaj512--

Welcome![edit]

Hello, AnujRaj512--, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Trilochanapala have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. MassiveYR (talk) 10:47, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Trilochanapala) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Trilochanapala, AnujRaj512--!

Wikipedia editor Scope creep just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Link to this article:Kabul Shahi

To reply, leave a comment on Scope creep's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

scope_creep (talk) 23:30, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2016 Memorial Van Damme[edit]

The article 2016 Memorial Van Damme has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTSTATS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 14:00, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Under 14 world records in athletics for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Under 14 world records in athletics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Under 14 world records in athletics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:53, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]