User talk:Aoba47/Archive 9

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Precious anniversary[edit]

A year ago ...
you stand apart
... you were recipient
no. 1397 of Precious,
a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:19, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review/List of awards and nominations received by Fifth Harmony[edit]

I have edited, added and removed tons of material and feel that this article could very well quality for a Featured List Candidate. As I was looking through the Peer Review option, I was left confused by how to do this. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. De88 (talk) 22:00, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @De88: I am confused by your comment Peer review and Featured List Candidates are two separate processes. Peer review is about getting feedback from the Wikipedia community while putting a list up for Featured List Candidates focuses on getting it promoted to the status of a featured list. Information about nominating an article for FLC can be found here, and information on starting a Peer review can be found here. It is entirely up to you on which way you want to go. Good luck with working further on the list. Aoba47 (talk) 00:39, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Aoba47: I know they are two separate processes but isn't a Peer review helpful before having it nominated for a Feature List Candidate? What I mean to say is that I want an admin (or someone of eligible status within Wikipedia standards) to Peer review the article to see what needs to be changed, added or deleted. Hope that made sense. By the way, there is one award that the group won several days ago. One of the group members posted on their social media accounts the award itself, with the specific category but there are no sources to cite this. What can I do? De88 (talk) 05:05, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      • @De88: Thank you for your response. Just wanted to make sure that you understood that they were two separate processes. You can definitely put it up for peer review to get more feedback from the community on how to improve it prior to putting it up for FAC. I have included the instructions for the peer review process above, but feel free to let me know if you have any questions. Just to clarify two things: 1) the peer review is not exclusively for admins, so you may or may not get a response from an admin, and 2) the peer review process takes time, especially since there was a backlog last time that I checked so you may have to keep it up there for a while before receiving a response. I have personally had mixed experiences with the peer review process (sometimes I received a lot of feedback while other times, I did not receive any), but I would suggest doing that if you would like to receive more commentary or are uncertain about anything on the list. Anyway, I hope that I could help in some way at least. (Also, just a note to you, you don't have to ping me on my talk page as I get a notification about it instantly). Aoba47 (talk) 14:39, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      • As for the information on the award, I would wait a little longer for a news outlet to pic it up as it is still really recent. Aoba47 (talk) 14:48, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
        • Thanks for the help. I'll look into it. Not very familiar with how most of Wikipedia works with the only exception being editing an article itself. From a simple skim-through, does this article seem decent enough to pass the nomination? De88 (talk) 00:26, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
          • @De88: Everything looks good from a simple skim-through. I would make sure everything with the references is correctly formatted, but I would think that the peer review process should help with this and any other aspect of the list more than I could. Aoba47 (talk) 01:06, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Alexandra Stan[edit]

Hi there! Thank you for all you have done for my coverage of Romanian songs on Wikipedia (GA reviews,...) Maybe you want to be part of the WikiProject Alexandra Stan, a new project. Best regards and I'm looking forward to review your FAC; Cartoon network freak (talk) 13:13, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for the invite; I will definitely look into it in the future. You have done a lot of really good work with the project. I will get to your GAN by the end of tonight. Aoba47 (talk) 14:39, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Cartoon network freak: It actually seems that a majority of the articles related to Alexandra Stan have already been brought up to GA status. Great work with that. Aoba47 (talk) 20:16, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 9 June 2017[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:17, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Boruto Uzumaki[edit]

Hey Aoba47,

Could you take a look at the article mentioned for GA? If you can't, let me know. Thanks. -- 1989 17:04, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @1989: I can definitely take a look at it. Thank you for the message. If possible, I would greatly appreciate it if you could look at one of my three open GANs? Aoba47 (talk) 17:05, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rugrats FAC[edit]

At the point the nomination is at, I have little to nothing to say of value. The prose has no readability issues. There were no other issues I could see. I feel uncomfortable giving immediate supports unless my previous support was of no help due to a stalled nomination. Best of luck with it. dannymusiceditor Speak up! 18:01, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you. I completely agree and understand your point; I greatly appreciate that you messaged me about it. Good luck with your Fightstar FAC; hopefully, it receives more attention and commentary this time around. Aoba47 (talk) 18:11, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Barge of the Dead[edit]

The article Barge of the Dead you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Barge of the Dead for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 1989 -- 1989 (talk) 08:21, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of A Toast to Men[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article A Toast to Men you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 08:40, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of A Toast to Men[edit]

The article A Toast to Men you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:A Toast to Men for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 12:40, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Peer review/M. G. Ramachandran filmography/archive1[edit]

I have opened up a PR for my next future attempt at FLC. Please feel free to leave comments there. Thanks.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 10:43, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for your message. Great work with this list so far, and I hope this receives a lot of attention from the peer review process. Unfortunately, I will be too busy to give this the time and attention it really deserves, so unfortunately, I cannot be much with this one. I apologize for that. Aoba47 (talk) 16:27, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of A Toast to Men[edit]

The article A Toast to Men you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:A Toast to Men for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 19:42, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Countess Palatine Ingrid Von Marburg[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Countess Palatine Ingrid Von Marburg you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sagecandor -- Sagecandor (talk) 00:02, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sévérine[edit]

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Sévérine has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the FAC.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:32, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Countess Palatine Ingrid Von Marburg[edit]

The article Countess Palatine Ingrid Von Marburg you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Countess Palatine Ingrid Von Marburg for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sagecandor -- Sagecandor (talk) 21:42, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Countess Palatine Ingrid Von Marburg[edit]

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Countess Palatine Ingrid Von Marburg has been completed.

Good luck with the FAR.

Let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:52, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Loev[edit]

Hey, I added a new section to the film's article (I figured that your suggestion had a lot of scope). Could you possibly take a look? Thanks either way. Also, I went through your FAC, I'll try and drop by soon. Cheers. NumerounovedantTalk 07:58, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Numerounovedant: I can definitely look through your FAC. I will get to it sometime this week. My previous FAC was just promoted yesterday/today, but I have recently opened up a new one and I would greatly appreciate your comments there if you have the time. Aoba47 (talk) 14:29, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speed Buggy[edit]

Hey Aoba47; hope all is well. I just had a question for you – I wanted your opinion on whether or not I should nominated Speed Buggy to undergo FAC. You've had quite a few television articles pass and I wanted some advice. Thanks, Carbrera (talk) 05:08, 21 June 2017 (UTC).[reply]

  • I will take a look at it later tonight and provide my comments about it here if that is okay with you. Aoba47 (talk) 14:42, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Carbrera: I do not see any major issues with the article, and it appears to be ready for the FAC process. I would just make that you have mined all of the possible sources for information on the series, specifically for its production/development. In the second paragraph of the "Legacy" subsection, I would add a topic sentence that made the point of it clear (the cameo appearances in cartoons and other mediums). Good luck with it. I would also recommend contacting other users to get their feedback on this. Aoba47 (talk) 16:37, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source[edit]

Can you perform the source review for this? I am struggling to find any reviewer for this. Your help will be a blessing. Plus, I will be looking at your FAC tonight. Thanks!Krish | Talk 12:54, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The TV Star
For outstanding work with WikiProject Television, specifically the promotion of three featured articles, two featured lists and a featured topic in the June 2017 Signpost. Thank-you for your amazing contributions to the Project! – Reidgreg (talk) 13:15, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 June 2017[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:31, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Russell family of Passions infobox[edit]

I think the Russell family page needs an infobox to show how long they were on the soap Passions as well as who created and introduced the family. All of the other soap opera families have infoboxes on their pages. Jester66 (talk) 20:45, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Jester66: I do not believe that infobox adds much to the article. All of the information that you mentioned above (i.e. information on who introduced and created the family) can already be located in the second sentence of the lead's first paragraph. Also, the amount of time that each character spent on the show varies so it would be better to leave that information for each of relevant character subsections. With all due respect, the infobox appears more like a cosmetic change to the article and I do not necessarily find much value in it. The use of an infobox in a particular article should be examined on an individual basis so whether or not other articles/lists on soap opera families has one or not is not directly relevant to this conversation. It does not seem, to me at least, to be necessary in this context. Aoba47 (talk) 20:49, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Aoba47: The thing is on Wikipedia, it is standard that soap opera and other television families receive an infobox for overview. Jester66 (talk) 22:47, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Jester66: @Livelikemusic: Where does it say that exactly? There is nothing about this in the WikiProject for Soap Operas (with the only mention of infoboxes being reserved for those for individual characters). Can you point out exactly where it says this? I honestly do not believe that is the case. I know the topic of an infobox can be quite contentious, as I have seen similar debates run on articles dealing with living people/biographies (and there are several cases in which articles on biographies do not contain infoboxes for the reasons that I have already mentioned above). I still do not see the need for an infobox; I do not necessarily agree with the rationale that it "is included to provide an overview for the reader" as all of the pertinent information is located directly in the lead. I am going to ping @Mike Christie: as he provided extensive copy-editing and feedback on this during the FAC process and @Ian Rose: who was the FAC coordinator that promoted this to get their feedback on this as I do not agree with your statement as I have never seen such a "standard" like the one that you mention above. In the future, it would be more ideal if you would either message me directly or post this on the article's talk page to prompt a discussion rather than making direct changes on the article itself. Also, the bit about Lisa de Cazotte being the one to introduce the family is not cited, and I am not sure if that is entirely correct as I have not ran across any sources supporting this during my work on this article; it would be incorrect to just assume this given her role as the show's executive producer. Aoba47 (talk) 22:59, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I wouldn't necessarily be opposed to an infobox, but I don't think they should be added just because they're frequently used for a certain class of articles, which is what I take it is meant by "standard". I think an infobox is worthwhile if it contains useful information that is not immediately obvious from a glance at the first sentence. In borderline cases I tend to leave an infobox out as they have a tendency to grow, as editors will fill out more and more of the parameters; often this makes them too long to serve their real purpose, which is a quick index to key information. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 01:02, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Mike Christie:Given Passions has been off the air in nine years, it is safe to say that the infobox won't expand. I put the simple parts of this particular infobox in order to avoid more clutter, however if you include more of the infobox then it would include members and would have them put on the infobox separately. Jester66 (talk) 02:02, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • All of the information from the infobox can be located in the lead so the infobox is unnecessary. I agree that this topic will not expand in the future, but I still do not understand the point to the addition of the infobox. There is already a box with the characters and actors in the "Creation and development" section. Aoba47 (talk) 02:19, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I use infoboxes in 99% of the articles I edit but those are generally biographies of military personnel or unit histories where a good deal of statistical info is best rendered in such a manner. I don't think they serve a special purpose in articles on media/arts and will tend to defer to the preference of the main editor(s) of those articles. The bottom line is that infoboxes are neither mandated nor prohibited in any article and so generally require consensus to add or remove. It seems to me that this article currently has consensus not to employ one, having passed a FAC whose participants evidently saw no reason to use it. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 02:29, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for your input. I greatly appreciate that you took the time to comment on this. I hope you had a wonderful day. Aoba47 (talk) 02:37, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Randall Flagg[edit]

Hi I tried going over the suggestions you made for the Randall Flagg article if you want to take a look. Thanks.--CyberGhostface (talk) 13:24, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for your message. I will look at your FAC right now. Aoba47 (talk) 13:44, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Citations are all set, thanks again.--CyberGhostface (talk) 18:13, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pru (album)[edit]

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Pru (album) has been completed.

Good luck with its FAC review.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns following my extensive copy edit.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 15:30, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disneyland Railroad featured article nomination[edit]

The Disneyland Railroad article is currently being nominated to become a featured article here: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Disneyland Railroad/archive1. I see that you are one of the more active reviewers for featured article candidates, so I eagerly invite you to weigh in on this one. It has passed specialized reviews for its images and sources, and one review for its prose, but it still needs a few people to chime and say they support the nomination on the review page to wrap things up. Your input on that page will be very helpful. Jackdude101 (Talk) 18:39, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Jackdude101: I will take a look at it today if that is okay with you. I would greatly appreciate if you could look at my current FAC? Thank you in advance. Aoba47 (talk) 18:41, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FAC reviewing barnstar[edit]

The Reviewer Barnstar
FAC can't function without people like you contributing reviews. Thank you for the eight FAC reviews you did during June. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 18:57, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FD3 FAN[edit]

Hi Aoba, I should have probably done this earlier; sorry about that. I just wanted to thank you for helping and supporting the FAN for Final Destination 3. I really enjoy working with you. And I hope all goes well with your own FAN of "Shine". --PanagiotisZois (talk) 22:09, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for your kind words, and I am happy that I could help. You did a lot of great work with that article, and I look forward to seeing your future work on here. Aoba47 (talk) 00:58, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Walt Disney World Railroad featured article nomination[edit]

Well, I nominated another one: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Walt Disney World Railroad/archive1. You are welcome to comment on it, if you wish. Jackdude101 19:03, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for your note; I will try to get to it by the end of the weekend. Aoba47 (talk) 19:15, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2017[edit]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 10, No. 1 — 2nd Quarter, 2017
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2017, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation
To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to update the distribution list.
(Delivered 14:33, 9 July 2017 (UTC))

Growing the Big One[edit]

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Growing the Big One has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:34, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ShineGwenPromoCoverLimitedEdition.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ShineGwenPromoCoverLimitedEdition.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:32, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alice Tangerini photograph[edit]

There appear to be several photographs available on various web pages, all copyrighted of course. Do you think any copyright holders would be willing to share their work with Wikipedia if asked very nicely? There are a couple of stunning photographs of her working with an eyepatch. Surtsicna (talk) 15:34, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Surtsicna: I think that if we asked them nicely about using one of their images on here for her article, that at least one of them would be willing to share their work. It would greatly improve the article to have an image. I will definitely do some research on this later today. Feel free to contact people as well and add an image if you get permission. Thank you again for your help and kind words for the article. I enjoyed putting this together a lot. Aoba47 (talk) 15:42, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Barge of the Dead[edit]

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Barge of the Dead has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:10, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 July 2017[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of When I Met You (Fantasia song)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article When I Met You (Fantasia song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Changedforbetter -- Changedforbetter (talk) 07:01, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of When I Met You (Fantasia song)[edit]

The article When I Met You (Fantasia song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:When I Met You (Fantasia song) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Changedforbetter -- Changedforbetter (talk) 12:01, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of When I Met You (Fantasia song)[edit]

The article When I Met You (Fantasia song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:When I Met You (Fantasia song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Changedforbetter -- Changedforbetter (talk) 14:41, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Drive (2011 film)/archive1[edit]

Greetings, would you be interested in reviewing this list that has been around for two months at WP:Flc? I'm sure you're gonna love it as it's a compilation of awards received by an awesome crime flick. As always, totally fine if you're too busy. ;) Slightlymad (talk) 15:45, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I can definitely review your list. I will put up comment as soon as I can. Hopefully, it will receive more attention in the future. Aoba47 (talk) 15:46, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A cupcake for you![edit]

Thank you for reviewing and promoting my article "Honor to Us All" to Good Article status; it is always a pleasure collaborating with you. Changedforbetter (talk) 18:47, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you! I greatly appreciate your kind words, and I am always to happy to have a cupcake lol. Aoba47 (talk) 18:49, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Thank you very much for reviewing my Good article nominations. Always remember that your work is appreciated and don't be scared to ask me to do something for you if you need to. Best regards, Cartoon network freak (talk) 11:10, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you! I greatly appreciate your message. Aoba47 (talk) 14:26, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Monkey D. Luffy[edit]

Hey Aoba47,

I'm working on the article linked above to GA. Is there anything that needs to be improved? Thanks. -- 1989 22:37, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I will take a look at it tomorrow if that is okay with you. Aoba47 (talk) 22:39, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Everything looks good to me. I could not find any major complaints from my brief read-through of the article. Aoba47 (talk) 03:49, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's good to hear. Thanks for the brief feedback. -- 1989 09:34, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Appian Way Productions[edit]

Hi, Aoba. I have nominated the article for FA; honestly it seems to have stalled at FAC with limited commentary. Should you have time and inclination, I would be delighted to hear any comments you might have. Cheers – FrB.TG (talk) 10:04, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I just added my comments to the FAC. I hope you find it to be helpful. Good luck with your FAC. Aoba47 (talk) 16:24, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Holy Wood (In the Shadow of the Valley of Death)/archive7[edit]

Our colleague needs help with his FAC as it's on the verge of getting failed due to lack of responses from other editors; it's second to the last of the "older noms" queue. You are a regular commentator at FAC and I'm sure you can approach this article better since it's about a studio album. I already gave my thoughts on it and based on my thorough observation, it definitely surpasses the criteria and deserves the much-coveted "shiny bronze star". But don't take my word for it, have a look yourself and toss him your comments in the nom page. Best, Slightlymad (talk) 10:20, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I can definitely take a look at it. I will try to have my comments up by the end of today. If that does not happen, then I will definitely get to it by the end of the week. Aoba47 (talk) 14:45, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Alice Tangerini[edit]

On 24 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alice Tangerini, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Alice Tangerini is the only botanical illustrator ever hired by the Smithsonian Institution? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alice Tangerini. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Alice Tangerini), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

IronGargoyle (talk) 12:01, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you! It was really cool to work on something so far out of my comfort zone. Aoba47 (talk) 14:45, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Teamwork Barnstar
You're my hero. Slightlymad (talk) 03:29, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Anytime; I am glad that I could help in any way. Aoba47 (talk) 04:23, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Nani filmography/archive1[edit]

This is my fourth attempt at a FL. Feel free to leave comments if any, if time permits. Regards, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:05, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Will do; good luck with your nomination. I will try to have my comments up by the end of the day. Aoba47 (talk) 15:00, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When I Met You (Fantasia song)[edit]

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article "When I Met You" has been completed.

This second half of this sentence in the Synopsis and reception second stumped me. "She develops a crush on a classmate, while her male friend overs her." You'll need to clarify this.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:07, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for your copy-edit as always. I will revise the section that you have noted above. I think I just forgot to add a word as I did a majority of the work for this article in one sitting. Hope you are having a wonderful day. Aoba47 (talk) 21:23, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Resilient Barnstar
The good thing about you is that you never give up! "Shine" is now FA and it could never have been accomplished without your dedication to the subject. Great job! (and thanks for bringing a Gwen article to FA status lol) Carbrera (talk) 01:16, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for your kind words and help throughout the project; I am very proud of getting it promoted as a FA. On a random note, it is exciting to hear that Gwen is recording new music and I am looking forward to hearing it in the future. Hope you are having a wonderful day so far. Aoba47 (talk) 01:50, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cliff and Jake[edit]

Thank you for adding this episode as "Denise Huxtable"'s last appearance; I knew she was written out in season seven, but I had the hardest time determining the specific episode. If you don't mind, can you just leave the episode's production information (season and episode number) in a message on my talk page so that I can cite it within the body of the article itself? Thanks!--Changedforbetter (talk) 17:01, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Changedforbetter: Anytime; I used the List of The Cosby Show episodes so I would encourage you to double-check the information. I think that it is correct, but my memory of the show, particularly the later seasons, is not that great, but you can double-check the information with other sites to confirm this. It is a shame that Bonet's pregnancy was not incorporated into A Different World as that would have been interesting, and I think Debbie Allen would have done a lot of cool things with the character development side of things. I will leave the information of the season and episode number on your talk page. Wonderful work with this article; you are definitely one of the users on here that I look to for inspiration. Aoba47 (talk) 17:04, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I was wondering if you could offer me some insight. I'm pretty much putting the finishing touches on the Denise article; in the past I've used the tool http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/webchecklinks.py?page=Denise_Huxtable to determine which links and resources cited were "unstable" and needed to be archived, but the link seems to have been...discontinued or is unavailable now? I was wondering if you're aware of an alternative tool on Wikipedia that does something similar?--Changedforbetter (talk) 22:26, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Changedforbetter: I apologize for the super late response, but I am not aware of an alternative tool unfortunately. Aoba47 (talk) 04:13, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Shine"[edit]

Congratulations on the recent promotion, which I have only just seen. I'm sorry I never got back to the article, but you clearly didn't need me! Josh Milburn (talk) 22:34, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you! And you gave a lot of helpful commentary that improved the article a great deal. Aoba47 (talk) 01:59, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PR request[edit]

Hi Aoba. How are you? I've made it through Mercy Point once and it looks pretty good so far. I noticed a few little things and will mention them (and maybe I'll notice other stuff) on my second read-through.
By the way, I was wondering whether you might possibly have time to give feedback at Wikipedia:Peer review/Watching the River Flow/archive1. If you don't, no worries. Thank you for considering. Moisejp (talk) 05:39, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I would be more than happy to help with your peer review. I will try to have my comments up in the next couple of days, but I will definitely get to it by the weekend at the latest. Aoba47 (talk) 14:21, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FAC reviewing barnstar[edit]

The Reviewer Barnstar
FAC can't function without people like you contributing reviews. Thank you for the thirteen FAC reviews and one image review you did during July. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 23:38, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 5 August 2017[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Melanie Barnett copyedit[edit]

Can I just say, holy shit! The article looks great. It actually rekindled my interest in both The Game and Girlfriends. I just wanted to tell you two things I noticed. Firstly, when talking about real-life people you refers to them using their given names rather than their family names. I'm not sure if that's a huge problem but from most articles I've seen it's the other way around. Which goes into my second point. Would you mind if I copyedited the article and changes the names (among other things) myself? That way, you could also focus on other projects. PanagiotisZois (talk) 13:04, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I later realized that you had already submitted the article for copyediting. Well, it's done. Overall great article, with only a few nit-picks here and there. PanagiotisZois (talk) 14:00, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for the copy-edit and for your kind words! I am glad that the article had restarted your interest in both series. I agree with your point about using the family names rather than the given names; the only reason why I did the other way was to avoid confusion between Tia and Tamera, but since Tamera is only mentioned in one section, I agree that it should be done in the family name way. Your copy-edits have helped to improve the article a great deal, and I greatly appreciate your help. Let me know if you need any help with any of your current projects, and I hope that you had a wonderful weekend! Aoba47 (talk) 15:15, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help with FD3[edit]

Hello Aoba, I was wondering if you could help me with my Final Destination 3 FAN. The nomination has already received an image review but still not a source review. If possible, could you do it? Considering the numerous sources cited in the article I understand if it's too much and you don't have time for it. Irregardless, I hope things are going well and wish you good luck with your future projects; especially Melanie. :) --PanagiotisZois (talk) 11:51, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I would be more than happy to help out with a source review. I will try to have it completed by the end of the today. Congrats on all of the attention and commentary given to your FAC. Aoba47 (talk) 14:41, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Once again, thank you so much Aoba for all your help. You reviewed and passed the film's GAN, you supported its FAN, provided a source review immediately when I asked for one. Thank you so much. I'm sorry for not having commented on your FAN of Mercy Point. You didn't need to remove your ask from my talk page. I don't consider your messages clutter. I'll try to help you more with your future projects. PanagiotisZois (talk) 17:06, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Anytime, and I am glad that I could help. You do a lot of great work on here so I am just glad to somewhat be a part of it. And thank you for your message; I apologize for modifying your talk page as I was just trying to help out. There's no need for you to apologize. It was an exceptionally quick FAN so it is very understandable. I look forward to helping you with future project as well. I just don't want you to feel pressured as I know that we are both probably busy with projects both on Wikipedia and in real life. Aoba47 (talk) 17:10, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you! And I apologize for the trouble with the source review; I feel really bad about it. I hope your week is going well so far. Aoba47 (talk) 22:21, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Really?[edit]

Oh my god! Are you really going to retire (please don't say yes)? Would be so unfortunate to lose an editor like you. It is my habit in general to say, I hope you have a great day, and all, and then once I saw your comment, and noticed you did the same too! In fact, the time I was saying, I hope you have a great rest of the day, to somebody, I noticed the exact same comment that you had given to somebody else (that was in fact the first time I noticed you), so I changed my comment a bit. You are so polite and such a great great contributor. I could go on listing great things about you, but the talk page might be flooded. You could, however, come in once in a while to edit or just simply. I am sure a lot of people (almost everybody who knows you, in fact) would feel bad just like I am, on losing you. Adityavagarwal (talk) 16:44, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Adityavagarwal: Thank you for your message! I greatly appreciate your kind words and support. It means a lot to me, and I am very fortunate and happy to have worked with people like you during my own projects and have helped with others' projects. I think that I will either "retire" or "semi-retire" for the immediate future as I am just feeling a little bit of burnout from focusing so much on getting articles through the FAC process. I am also turning my attention primarily to my future and my potential career path; I always wanted to be a writer and publish novels and short stories so I want to devote all of my energy to building my writing and art portfolio. I can easily become very caught with my work on here to the detriment of my real life work/responsibilities, so I think I could really use a break. In the future, I may return every once in a while to check the articles that I have worked on and to do some smaller, GAN projects. I just need to take a step away from Wikipedia for some time to focus on myself. I hope this message makes sense as I have the tendency to ramble lol. I hope you had a wonderful weekend, and thank you for everything! Aoba47 (talk) 18:25, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) So sad to see you leave too, Aoba. I stopped by to say thank you for providing comments on my latest FAC few days ago before your sudden retirement to pursue real-life obligations; I hope it gets promoted with your help. We actually share the same job prospects, except mine is more on screenwriting. But alas, I ended up editing an encyclopedia. lol. In any case, be seeing you. Slightlymad (talk) 11:02, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Slightlymad: Thank you for your message, and I am glad that I could help with your FAC. Good luck with your screenwriting dreams, as I have a lot of respect for that type of writing. Good luck with your current and future projects. Aoba47 (talk) 13:36, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Lol, so I see the "Can't retire" thing. . I think the "Retired" tag should now be closed in a box, and welcome back. It is so awesome that you decided to stay after all, so please let me know if I could review (image, source, or anything) any of your articles (I would be much honored). I think we would soon be seeing more awesome FAs from your side. Have a wonderful rest of the day! Adityavagarwal (talk) 17:18, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you! I still found myself gravitating back here, and doing work on here so I thought I might as well make it official. I hope that you have a wonderful rest of your day too! Aoba47 (talk) 17:25, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Breaking News[edit]

Firstly, I came here to say I was leaving some comments for your now-archived FAC on Pru. I'll leave them below just in case you're curious. Then I noticed your retirement banner on your talk page and had to bend down to pick my jaw up. I hope it's not true but I'm assuming it is. Nonetheless, I wish you the best in the future with your career. Hopefully it will be as successful as your run here on Wikipedia. You were and still are a very resourceful and enterprising editor. Keep in touch, Carbrera (talk) 00:53, 15 August 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Suggested comments from Carbrera (talk) 00:48, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • I would reword "Credits adapted from the liner notes of Pru and AllMusic." to "Credits adapted from AllMusic and the liner notes of Pru." to clarify that there are not any liner notes for AllMusic – do you know what I mean?
  • I would add that Billboard is the publication in the "Charts" section for the R&B Albums
  • For "Release history", you should alphabetize so that CD appears after Cassette instead of vice versa
  • I see that the Billboard source describes "Aaroma" with the additional text in the title, but on the vinyl/CD releases it omits that. Perhaps you could point that out?
I might add a few more comments later when I glance at the article again. Carbrera (talk) 00:53, 15 August 2017 (UTC).[reply]
  • @Carbrera: Thank you for your comment and your suggestions for the Pru article. I greatly enjoyed working with you, and I know that you will do well with all of your current and future projects on here and in real life. I will actually miss working with you a lot, and I will definitely still check in every now and then to see how your work is going. I will let you know if I ever come back to seriously editing on here once my work/life is figured out lol. Aoba47 (talk) 02:36, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Let me know too, when you come back to editing... After all, I might not forget my Image review on the article go waste. I hope that you semi-retire instead. As always, I hope you have a wonderful rest of the day writing days! Adityavagarwal (talk) 10:46, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you, and I am considering semi-retiring as opposing to full retiring. Aoba47 (talk) 13:34, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd also hate to see you go, Aoba. Best of luck with both offline and online future endeavors. Snuggums (talk / edits) 14:59, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @SNUGGUMS: Thank you for your kind words, and best of luck with your future endeavors both online and offline. It was a pleasure to work with you. Aoba47 (talk) 16:29, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sure thing, and I'm glad the feeling is mutual :) Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:35, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just the other day I was thinking (after seeing yet another article of yours at FAC), 'wow there's no stopping him'. Alas, not true anymore! We have had some brief interactions here, they were really nice. I wish you best luck with everything. – FrB.TG (talk) 22:29, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for your kind words, and I am very happy that I was able to do so much before the sheer amount of work just stopped me lol. I greatly appreciated our interactions and your help. I wish you luck with everything too, and I hope you are having a great week so far. Aoba47 (talk) 22:31, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FL[edit]

I would appreciate your help here like I always have.Krish | Talk 12:54, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Krish!: Thank you for your message. Unfortunately, I am currently too busy to conduct a review/provide commentary for your FLC due to IRL responsibilities, but it looks like it is in great shape and I am sure it will attract attention in the future. Good luck with it! I will have to watch this show sometime in the future. I will add it to my never-ending list lol. Aoba47 (talk) 13:54, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lars Alexandersson GA[edit]

With help of a fellow user, I managed to improve Lars Alexandersson's article and nominated it to GA. I don't know if it's possible since you are semi-retired, but I would appreciate if you review the article. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 01:31, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I will definitely pick it up for review since you have helped me so much with all of the source reviews for my FLC/FAC. I will have my comments up by the end of the weekend if that is okay with you. Aoba47 (talk) 02:15, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zobbel.de as the source[edit]

Thanks to your FL review for Ariana Grande discography. Now the page is nearly to pass, but the last problem is quite knotty. The problem is the reliability of zobbel.de. See here. Now I'm quite confused, hoping you can give some comments. --U990467 (talk) 03:42, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @U990467: Thank you for your message. I can understand the concern about using the citation. Wouldn't it be better to cite the direct source (i.e. from this link)? Aoba47 (talk) 04:33, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Aoba47: Zobbel.de has said that "All UK charts in full can be found in ChartsPlus: www.ukchartsplus.co.uk" on their website. However, UKChartsPlus has been listed in Websites to avoid per WP:BAD CHARTS. I'm wondering whether I should keep these source or just remove them. --U990467 (talk) 05:08, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • It is certainly complicated. I am not entirely sure what to advise you to do, but I would recommend trying to find chart information directly from the source if possible. Aoba47 (talk) 15:21, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of Charmed novels and short stories[edit]

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article List of Charmed novels and short stories has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:16, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A brownie for you![edit]

Thank you for, yet again, another great GA review! :-) Changedforbetter (talk) 03:26, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Anytime! I am glad that I could help out. Aoba47 (talk) 03:26, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Alice Young[edit]

Just in response to you saying Marc Cherry needs to be linked in both the lead and the first section, I've worked on several fictional character articles that have been promoted to GA and been told by reviewers several times that there's no need to link actors and producers multiple times throughout the article. Do you have anything to back up your claim that he NEEDS to be linked in the first section as well, or is that just your personal belief/opinion/preference? Creativity97 20:15, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Creativity97: I have actually received the opposite comments about this from reviewers, and I honestly do not read the Wikipedia policy/essays so just do whatever you feel is right. I was only trying to help as I have passed several articles on fictional characters from both the GAN process and the FAC process so I thought that I had a pretty good grasp on this type of thing, but like I said in the article's talk page, I am just going to avoid the article completely and leave it up to your personal preference. Some things that I changed however should be kept, such as moving the link for Deirdre Taylor to its first mention in the article and not linking multiple items. Also, even if you decide to unlink Marc Cherry, I would encourage you to use his full name in the article, as I was a little confused when I first read it as I did not immediately know who "Cherry" was referring to. Good luck with the GA review, and great work with the article overall. I apologize if I came across as rude in my edits or comments. The article is an interesting read, as I do enjoy the character and the show's first season (I honestly think it kind of fell off after the first season for me unfortunately). Aoba47 (talk) 20:36, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, no worries. If you think that having simply "Cherry" was confusing to you as a reader, I will leave it as you have it to avoid confusion for other readers. I do value your feedback on that, thank you. I don't have any issues with anything else you changed and I want to also to thank you for putting Spoon Rivers Anthology in italics and putting the year of its release next to it, that was very helpful. The fictional character articles I've worked on thoroughly and have been promoted to GA have largely been soap opera character articles and there's also a bit of a different set of agreed upon rules to those articles, so I might've also been bringing a bit of my knowledge from that into this article. You were not rude at all, if anything I was the one being rude and defensive about the article, so I apologize for that. Thank you for all your help, I do appreciate it! Creativity97 21:00, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Creativity97: Thank you for your response, and good luck with your current and future projects. I completely understand your response, as I would have most likely had the same or a similar response. Hopefully, one day, we can work together on something as you have done a lot of great work with the Mary Alice Young article. Have a great day! Aoba47 (talk) 23:35, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Homophobia article[edit]

Hi there! I am finished working on an article for a short film called Homophobia in my sandbox, but I have never written an article about a film, so I'm not that good with the style of writing it. I have seen that you have promoted several film articles to GA or even FA status, so could you take a look at my work? It would be also helpful if you could watch the 23-min film on YouTube to slightly check the plot section, as there were many terms that I did not know in English and I had to translate them with Google Translate. Am I demanding too much from you? I just feel the article has a lot of errors and it can't be put on Wikipedia as it stands now. Best regards and I would be glad to hear your response to the short film, Cartoon network freak (talk) 08:12, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Cartoon network freak: Thank you for your message; unfortunately, I do not have the time to watch the film and compare it to the "Plot" section that you have already created. If you are concerned about the prose, then I would highly encourage you to submit a request through WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors. The first thing that pops out to me when looking at your draft is your use of imdb as a source; imdb is not a reliable/credible source and should be replaced by either citing something else or just citing the film itself. I apologize for not having the time to fully commit to this, but good luck with this project! Aoba47 (talk) 15:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ugly (Fantasia song)[edit]

The article Ugly (Fantasia song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ugly (Fantasia song) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 21:21, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Melanie Barnett[edit]

On 30 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Melanie Barnett, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that producer Mara Brock Akil was hesitant to cast Tia Mowry as Melanie Barnett due to the actress's wholesome image from Sister, Sister? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Melanie Barnett. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Melanie Barnett), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex ShihTalk 00:03, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aoba47/Archive_9&oldid=1145880726"