User talk:Apaulsaid
Welcome!
|
It looks like you may be involved in the production of 54 Days. If that's true, then you should read our guidelines on conflicts of interest and external links. Wikipedia is not a promotional platform, and we generally don't like to promotional material. This would include teaser trailers. The artshub article is right on the cusp of what I would call promotional or advertising, and it looks more like a press release than a review. If you can find reviews from mainstream publications, such as The Australian or Sydney Morning Herald, that would be better. On the other hand, if you're involved in the production, you should follow the guidelines in WP:COIADVICE and WP:SPAMMER, which state that you should discuss controversial changes on the talk page and avoid promotional edits. Let me know if I can help you; you can leave a message on my talk page, or you can always ask questions at the Teahouse or the Help Desk. They can probably explain our policies very clearly and offer advice. Also, WikiProject Film is very helpful for film-related articles. You can see the manual of style for film-related articles there, and the Project's talk page is fairly active. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:21, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
![Notice](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article 54 Days has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFILM. Insufficient coverage to substantiate a claim of notability. The Daily Telegraph article is half quotes from director, half promotion (it has a link at the bottom for getting in touch with the filmmakers for "funding opportunities" for goodness sake). The Acting Australia article isn't a review, and it's dead anyway. ArtsHub is reliable, but on its own isn't sufficient to substantiate notability under WP:NFILM.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:58, 26 April 2020 (UTC)