User talk:Apl2007

Print Quota Theft[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Print Quota Theft, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Print Quota Theft. KurtRaschke (talk) 21:33, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Print Quota Theft[edit]

An editor has nominated Print Quota Theft, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Print Quota Theft and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 15:29, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Mary Ann McArthur[edit]

A tag has been placed on Mary Ann McArthur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Torchwood Who? (talk) 02:28, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Print Quota Theft[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Apl2007, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --JForget 20:45, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, when an article is deleted per AFD vote (see:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Print Quota Theft), it is recommended that if you want to re-create the article, you have to pass threw Deletion review to see if a new version of the article is notability and verifiable enough to be re-created it. If re-created without a review and that it is clearly not meeting notability guidelines, it may be speedy deleted as recreation of deleted material thus per criteria number G4 per Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion. A deletion proposal tag without a vote has been placed by an editor already.--JForget 20:52, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

edit count | edit summary usage

Editing concerns[edit]

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Kukini ^{háblame aquí} 15:44, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Red Light Evasion[edit]

A tag has been placed on Red Light Evasion requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. CardinalDan (talk) 03:46, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oklahoma City Article Edit Comments[edit]

Thanks for your help fighting vandalism on the Oklahoma City, Oklahoma article. Please maintain a civil tone on the comments to your edits as such they can be offensive to others besides the vandal. --Claygate (talk) 12:59, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Freewayjim[edit]

A tag has been placed on Freewayjim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Morbidthoughts (talk) 18:41, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Stop Drinking Soda[edit]

A tag has been placed on Stop Drinking Soda requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. CardinalDan (talk) 03:06, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Quit drinking soda[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Quit drinking soda, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Opinion piece - not encyclopedic

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Flying Toaster 03:09, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sodae[edit]

A tag has been placed on Sodae, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 03:19, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Baddery[edit]

A tag has been placed on Baddery, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 03:19, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Badery[edit]

A tag has been placed on Badery, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 03:19, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Attery[edit]

A tag has been placed on Attery, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 03:19, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to SDS, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 03:11, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Stop Drinking Soda. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. DanielDeibler (talk) 03:12, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User talk:DanielDeibler. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. DanielDeibler (talk) 03:13, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:CardinalDan. DanielDeibler (talk) 03:23, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 48 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Acroterion _(talk) 03:27, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To whom it may concern, my account was broken into sometime in mid-March and used for vandalism. Please ignore such attacks. Apl2007 (talk) 23:00, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Coinflation[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Coinflation, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

This term can't be found in popular press, reliable financial journalism or academic sources - fails Wikipedia:Neologism#Reliable_sources_for_neologisms

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Pointillist (talk) 20:58, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Print quota theft[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Print quota theft, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://wikibin.org/articles/print-quota-theft.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:02, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Luke Lapresi[edit]

Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia.

I'm sorry, but this has been deleted as meeting WP:CSD. You may want to carefully review Wikipedia:Your first article.

For basic information on beginning to write an article see User:Dloh/new.

For more general information about the deletion process, please see User:Dlohcierekim/deletion

If you believe the subject does in fact meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information, please contact me on my talk page.

If you wish to make test edits or work on the article before creating it, you can create a test page at User:Apl2007/test.

Cheers, and happy editing. Dloh cierekim 23:30, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Luke Lapresi[edit]

A tag has been placed on Luke Lapresi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Dloh cierekim 23:32, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Matt Marcotte[edit]

The article Matt Marcotte has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BIO. Search of Google fails to turn up any independent third-party WP:RS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 14:07, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Marcotte[edit]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Matt Marcotte. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Debit card fraud[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Debit card fraud, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.kevincoffee.com/money/atm_debit_card_fraud_information.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:20, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Debit card fraud[edit]

A tag has been placed on Debit card fraud requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 01:16, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Apl - although I agree that your article was not a copyright violation, it is a little bit short to act as an article on the subject. Do you have any reliable sources on hand that talk about the subject? If so, I would suggest you restart the article with a bit more content. It definitely seems like a notable subject. Christopher Parham (talk) 02:07, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Freecell Game 11982[edit]

The article Freecell Game 11982 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I refuse to believe that individual games are going to be notable enough for inclusion.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:55, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BMG Music Service[edit]

Please do NOT add back the information submitted here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bertelsmann_Music_Group&action=historysubmit&diff=353628109&oldid=353189579. This issue is with an unrelated company called BMG Music Service, a mail-order direct retailer, which was once owned by BMG but later merged with competitor Columbia House in 2005, and in 2008 the entire company was sold off to some company called Direct Brands Inc. This Direct Brands company is the culprit of the said 'fraud'. This issue is already covered in the appropriate place, the Columbia House page, under the section: Columbia_House#Fraudulent_Sale_of_Debt. Imperatore (talk) 23:51, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Lost money scam[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Lost money scam. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lost money scam. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Tyler McMillan Story[edit]

The article The Tyler McMillan Story has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of WP:Notability. Just another youtube video.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 10:07, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Stop Drinking Soda[edit]

A tag has been placed on Stop Drinking Soda, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Gonzonoir (talk) 08:06, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Doug Van Gundy[edit]

The article Doug Van Gundy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails to meet notability criteria

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]