Jump to content

User talk:Apologian

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Objections to evolution, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Objections to evolution was changed by Apologian (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-03-01T21:26:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:27, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Objections to evolution. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tmol42 (talk) 21:37, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Objections to evolution, you will be blocked from editing. Tmol42 (talk) 21:39, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Icestorm815Talk 21:46, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel that the article is bias, please express your concerns on the talk page and provide examples so a consensus can be formed. Icestorm815Talk 21:53, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the edits for which you were warned for vandalism:
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Objections to evolution. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. —C.Fred (talk) 21:54, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]