User talk:JosephJames6

August 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It would be appreciated if you would not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Lacey Von Erich. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:10, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to Brooke Adams (model):

Your recent edit to Brooke Adams (model) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a non-talk page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 21:30, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to User:Hornetman16

Hi there. If you don't mind my asking .... what are you doing there?? - Alison ☺

No i do not mind, see i have been going around looking, for UBX's so i had to find out the code, so i went to edit. AquariusBoy01 21:42, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, okay. Probably best to copy it to your own page first, though, as it can be considered rude to edit someone else's. Can I help? - Alison ☺ 21:44, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the tip. No, thank you though for the help. AquariusBoy01 21:45, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No probs :) - Alison ☺ 23:36, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lacey Von Erich

I agree with the deletion for her article, she already has one. It's under the Von Erich article. There was no need for creation. Art 281 01:47, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking our discussion

Please do not vandalize Wikipedia by blanking pages as you did on this section. Blanking pages can be harmful to Wikipedia because it has a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! Art 281 01:59, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JosephJames6! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! --Marc ^Talk 03:00, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Well what nice people are here on Wikipedia, thank you. I was just wondering where the UBX box for siblings or sisters is, can you help me? AquariusBoy01 03:03, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to Torrie Wilson:

Your recent edit to Torrie Wilson (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a non-talk page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 17:17, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also she resides in Spring, Texas. Is a suburb city within the Houston City Limits. The Woodlands & Spring, Texas are next to each other, they are 10 minutes apart. She is currently dating Nick Mitchell, where he resides in Spring, Texas. Therefore they live together, thus she resides in Spring, Texas. Art 281 17:46, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Any proof she is datin Nick Mitchell? AquariusBoy01 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Go to her official clothing line website. Everybody in the wrestling internet community knows about that! Art 281 17:51, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Um, that doesn't mean there dating it doesn't say anywhere "Torrie Wilson & Nick Mitchell are dating" And just because Nick Mitchell "may" live in Spring, Texas doesn't mean his girlfriend is Torrie, it could mean that they are friends. And you have no proof that they live in Spring, Texas, you probably just pick a suburb at it was Spring, okay. AquariusBoy01 18:01, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Dude I am being serious. You do not know because you do not live in Houston! I know what I edit alright? And yes they are dating you apperently aren't in the internet that much. Art 281 18:05, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing read the Spring, Texas article Art 281 18:05, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

one more thing, they dont have any proof either. Exactly "Houston" not "Spring". AquariusBoy01 18:06 and 18:07, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You do not need proof alright? Everybody knows about it, that's why is there! I have been longer I know what I am doing Art 281 18:10, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ok, whatever. Are you changing the suplex move? AquariusBoy01 18:11, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that move isn't considered "Signature". She doesn't uses anymore. Even without references she hasn't use that move since long time ago Art 281 18:13, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, she just did it 2 weeks ago. AquariusBoy01 18:18, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't mean it's considered "Signature" Art 281 18:28, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yes it does, she used it two weeks in a row, and on raw and you don't consider it a signature changing again. AquariusBoy01 18:32, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Has she used it since then? No. So it's not considered "Signature" Art 281 18:34, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also I am not the only one that has been changing. Your edits are being changed by a automated bot. So I am not the only one that is changing it. Art 281 18:38, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stop putting "Snap Suplex" to her page, it's not considered a "Signature" move. Please stop or you will be blocked. Thanks Art 281 18:54, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually you will, i put you on 3RR. so put it back. And it is a signature. AquariusBoy01 18:58, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's considered a "Signature" Move because you say so? I do not think so Art 281 19:03, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, because Torrie Wilson does it almost every week!!! AquariusBoy01 19:05, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, I'll leave it like that Art 281 19:06, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

fine leave it like what? AquariusBoy01 19:06, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I put the move back Art 281 19:08, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

THANK YOU! AquariusBoy01 19:010, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Jillian Hall

Hey, maybe you can help me with something. It says on her imdb.comprofile that she has a daughter with an indy wrestler named Tiny Tim.I know the imdb.com isn't a reliable source but I can't find another source that says this or says this fact is untrue.Can you help me find a source that says either she has a daughter or not?Thanks(MgTurtle 18:12, 11 August 2007 (UTC)).[reply]

i'll try. AquariusBoy01 18:13, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think IMDb is the only source that it has. And how come you have two accounts, if you don't mind me asking. AquariusBoy01 18:24, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that's the only source that I can find now but I think it used to be on her Myspace but it's not there anymore.I lost the password to my first account and then created a new account but I use this account.I guess I could just get rid of it but I just haven't yet.I didn't see the sockpuppet thing that you were talking about on your page.Is it on someone else's page?(MgTurtle 18:41, 11 August 2007 (UTC)).[reply]

that's what happended to me, and i didn't no about the suck puppet. HELP. AquariusBoy01 18:13, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I just use this account and the only reason I put the alternate user tag on my page is because someone put it on the page and I put it on both pages to make sure that people knew that both account were mine.Have you tried to explain your side of this.I mean look at User:La Parka Your Car, he's in the same place you are.(MgTurtle 18:47, 11 August 2007 (UTC)).[reply]

well who do i explain it too? AquariusBoy01 18:48, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just read about Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser and i think this is how you can explain yourself.I'm still reading the sock puppet page but maybe this can help you.(MgTurtle 18:52, 11 August 2007 (UTC)).[reply]

Did you get anywhere with the check thingie?(MgTurtle 23:16, 11 August 2007 (UTC)).[reply]

im not sure. AquariusBoy01 12 August 2007

3RR

Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits, as you are doing in Torrie Wilson. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The three-revert rule (3RR) prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. - Deep Shadow 19:02, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to "Cherry"

Just because you have references of the move "Sprin"G"board Bulldog" doesn't mean that it can stay there. She hasn't used that move since she was in the indies which was 4 years ago. Is not considered "Signature", she didn't wrestle often in OVW she mainly managed, and the only move that is considered "Finishing" is the Stunner because she has used it on her time when she was in OVW. So I deleted the move because even though it has references she hasn't used it for 4 years. A "Signature" move is a move that a wrestler uses often. "Signature" move is not a move that was last used 4 or 6 years ago. Art 281 20:26, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, i am not going to change it, but that's because her new gimmick of Cherry, she never had a match. And she hasen't used the Stunner since the Indies. AquariusBoy01 20:30, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well your right about the "Stunner", should we delete the whole thing? (Finishing & Signature Moves Section) Art 281 20:42, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

maybe unless your being sarcastic? AquariusBoy01 20:42, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, then I'll delete it Art 281 20:49, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to The Garcia Twins

There appearance on the WWE Divas Magazine, is not notable. If your trying to save the article from deleting that is no going to help is going to make it worse. Anyways just letting you know that you can't write They will". Whatever you write on an article it has to be past tense. Again there appearance on the WWE Diva Magazine is not notable Art 281 23:44, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it's helping the article in is notable. And it didn't happen yet, they shot the photos but the magazine was not released so you have to put will

The article got deleted, so there was no need to bold The Garcia Twins names. I know what you mean when you bold them, but in this case it doesn't work. Art 281 01:51, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:GarciaTwins2006.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:GarciaTwins2006.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. But|seriously|folks 06:26, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Garcia,_Brianna2006.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Garcia,_Brianna2006.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. But|seriously|folks 06:27, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding you edits to Maria

Even though on wwe.com they are teasing where Maria is moving, until she does not reveal where she is moving, you have to leave Louisville, Kentucky there until she reveals on wwe.com what city she resides. Art 281 01:21, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also the "Headscissors Takedown" isn't considered "Signature" she hasn't used it on WWE TV. Art 281 01:22, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chicago, the suburbs you could just put Chicago, Illinois.

No, until she reveals what actual city she resides you have to leave Louisville, Kentucky there. That would be considered a rumor and a rumor here in wikipedia equals not notable. Art 281 01:27, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The city is Chicago, and if WWE has it, you have to put. AquariusBoy01 01:29, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maria said "close to" Chicago, Illinois. Or the "suburbs" of Chicago. But she said is "outside" but "near" Chicago. We have to wait until she says what actual town she moves. Art 281 01:32, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No Maria did not say close to she said "in a suburb of Chicago" so that's what we have to put.AquariusBoy01 01:33, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly, that doesn't mean is in Chicago. Art 281 01:48, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it does, it means the suburb is surrounded by Chicago . AquariusBoy01 12 August 2007

Image copyright problem with Image:Milena Roucka 2007.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Milena Roucka 2007.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 12:54, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Link to Milena Roucka on WWE Roster

I fixed it already. Art 281 15:28, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

STop editing my fixes, they are better written than your version, you can't have everything your way. I know what has been happening in OVW ok? I know what I am doing Art 281 15:36, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Go create your own article. Mine is way better, and don't change the Media! AquariusBoy01 15:38, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, you can't own an article, ok I am making it better. I have been here for a long time I know what I am doing. YOu can't have everything your way!. Art 281 15:41, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your version has run-on sentences and fragments. Art 281 15:42, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Um... i am giving you the career section. SO GET OVER IT. I want Media and The Beginning, OKAY! AquariusBoy01 15:42, 12 August 2007 (UTC

Like I say you can't own an article, I can edit it if I want to. is an encyclopedia that "ANYONE CAN EDIT" I am going to block you if you do not stop. Art 281 15:45, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I AM GOING TO BLOCK, And she didn't start out as Roucka, she started as Milena and then changed to name to Roucka.

How can you block me? I ain't doing anything. lol. AND NO she debuted as "Roucka" she always been "Roucka" Art 281 15:47, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

She did at one time manage Vladimer. AquariusBoy01 15:42, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ONE TIME, that doesn't considered her as the manager of him. Art 281 15:57, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not one time, it was a stable they stay together. It was a couple of times. AquariusBoy01 15:59, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

True, but whenever say Vladimer wrestled, Milena was never at ringside with him only Mike Kruel. Art 281 16:00, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So that means she managed both of them. AquariusBoy01 16:01, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, I said whenever Vladimer wrestled, she NEVER was with him at ringside, only Mike Kruel. Dude, I know what I am doing, I watch OVW ok, I order DVD's of the shows I know what's going on in OVW. Art 281 16:03, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As you might know, her profile used to say Milena. AquariusBoy01 16:04, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, it always said "Roucka". Also you do not need to put on top of the article "and she is working for "farm facility" Ohio VAlley Wrestling". It's already mentioned under the "World Wrestling Entertainment" sub section. Dude come on be serious you have to admit that the article looks better the version I have it. Art 281 16:06, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I SAID USED! IT'S MILENA AT THAT'S THAT, IF I WANT THINGS MY WAY THAT ARE RIGHT THEY HAVE TO BE THAT WAY!AquariusBoy01 16:07, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep on saying....just keep on saying.........watch was going to happen. Art 281 16:09, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also how can you report me for 3RR, if I have NEVER reverted the page. Only once. Bad Mistake. Art 281 16:10, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No you did it 5 times. AquariusBoy01 16:07, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Umm...no I only revert it once. All others I edit it to my version by going to "edit this page", I never reverted the article I am not stupid!. I have proof. Art 281 16:16, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, well leave the Ohio Valley Wrestling thing, and one of her ring names was Milena, and you can keep that she started with the name Roucka. AquariusBoy01 16:18, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Look this is what you have on the article on top "and she is working for their farm territory Ohio Valley Wrestling" that doesn't make sense. It's already mentioned in the sub-section of the article. Also she never started with Milena, cause people didn't wanted to be confused with WWE Superstar Melina. I do not get what your saying? Art 281 16:21, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Go look at her article right now, let's leave it like that. Art 281 16:23, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it does make sense if you read articles, and Roucka doesn't reference because that is wrong, it doesn't say she started as Roucka there so you have to take it away and put the true info. AquariusBoy01 16:23, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, take away only the reference. Art 281 16:26, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You know they can't put this article on "deletion" because it has everything. LOL!!!!! Art 281 16:29, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

put what? AquariusBoy01 16:30, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Milena Roucka's article to "deletion" (like the garcia twins). Art 281 16:31, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, Lmao. AquariusBoy01 16:31, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

These people are really strict on articles. Art 281 16:32, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, lol.AquariusBoy01 16:33, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let's call it a truse, let's go delete our reports of 3RR?? What do you say? Art 281 16:35, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just on you edit summary put "We work things out". Art 281 16:35, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. AquariusBoy01 16:33, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me when you have done it, so I can do mine. Art 281 16:38, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mine is not there. AquariusBoy01 16:38, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah i guess your article was better than mine. AquariusBoy01 16:42, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I just reliazed that she did managed Vladimer Koslov. LOL Art 281 17:25, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I just noticed that you created the Milena Roucka article. I'm only wondering why you titled it "Milena Roucka (model)", or was the page previously titled that way? Unless there is another Milena Roucka, I don't see why you can't change the name to drop the disambiguous "(model)". - Deep Shadow 17:33, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted too. AquariusBoy01 17:38, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your message on my talk page, that's understandable why you named it so. If you'd like, I could see what I can do about moving the article. - Deep Shadow 21:01, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, maybe I shouldn't. I have just viewed the activity log for the page and it seems it is always being recreated, deleted and protected. The last such activity occurred on 9 March 2007. I have a feeling that this page may be deleted too, although with the sources you and Art 281 have provided, it may have a chance of surviving. - Deep Shadow 21:12, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Milena is canadian not american Art 281 18:45, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say she was American. AquariusBoy01 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Um, that was rude. I guess you have no idea what your doing. You have to learn. 15 August 2007 (UTC)

That was before we called it a truce. Art 281 21:14, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No it wasn't, the time you put truce 16:35 and when you said that other it was 17:34, clearly i know what i am doing cause if Milena Roucka was protected and Milena Roucka (model) wasn't, they i only could have used Milena Roucka (model), i wanted to prove i could have created the article and i did but i had model at the end of it, i do not see what the big deal is. There is no truce here, your just a liar, Grow Up. AquariusBoy01 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Grow up? me? your the one who is "hogging" all the articles you edit. And do not delete her reference of her Billed height & weight, that's references, do not delete it. Art 281 23:52, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Every other wrestler's article is like that, the more references the less likely that the article is considered "Deletion". And it doesn't make the article "jumbled" Art 281 23:54, 15 August 2007 (UTC) Yes it does.[reply]

Actually you can't tell me what to do... and i am not the one "hogging" the articles. You put Roucka as what she debuted and that is not true, You hogged the article, you pratically made re-created the whole thing, and almost everything i did you deleted. Sorry for hurting "your" precious Development Diva Article, just like all your Smackdown! Divas as well. And you typed SmackDown! and Development Divas, not Raw Divas like Maria Kanellis. (Quote:These people are really strict on articles. Art 281 16:32, 15 August 2007 (UTC)) Your really strict on articles. Now you GROW UP! Your the one whose Lieing and talking behind backs. NOW AGAIN YOU GROW UP! And stop editing this page, i always get edit conflict! AGAIN GROW UP! AquariusBoy01 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:RS Art 281 00:01, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because your version had run-on sentences, fragments I HAVE REALIBE SOURCES. Art 281 00:02, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leave me alone. AquariusBoy01 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Tell me where you found that she used first the ring name "Milena" when she debuted on OVW. Tell me so I can beleive you. Art 281 00:07, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You know i don't have any proof, happy? You don't have any proof either, and her profile doesn't count, because it used to say Milena not Roucka.

I have proof, the references. And her profile counts, like every other wrestler. And how many times do you visit OVW, how many times have you read the complete results, how much do you know about OVW, apperently nothing because you do not know what your typing, not everything has to be your way, I guess I am a professional editor. Art 281 00:13, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok no she didn't end of story! And i did have realible sources, um cause they seem to still be there.AquariusBoy01 15 August 2007 (UTC)

That's because i added references to it. If I would have let the article your way since then beginning it would have been considered "Deletion", but thanks to my OVW knowledge, that won't happen. Art 281 00:17, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Liar, See there was only three references when you changed everything, I Put them there. AquariusBoy01 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Yeah 3 references wasn't enough. Again please see WP:RS Art 281 00:23, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You said you put all the references. AquariusBoy01 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Nelson Frazier, Jr.

I know you see the note on the Nelson Frazier, Jr. article, because you're deleting it. Stop changing it.«»bd(^talk _stalk) 18:47, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Kristal Marshall's Signature Moves and Torrie Wilson's

I have see that you have put on Kristal's article "headscissors takedown". That is not considered "Signature" as she hasn't used it in like a year!. Also the reference you provided for Torrie's DDT does not satisfied it for the move to be placed there. Art 281 21:24, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stop putting regarding! And if i put the time (2003-04) you have to keep the move. It is consider a signature. AquariusBoy01 15 August 2007 (UTC)

But the reference does not satisfied for the move to be kept there, look for another reference. Art 281 00:04, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need a reference. She has done it several times in (2003-04) so you have to keep it, she has done it between that time period, so it is consider a signauture.AquariusBoy01 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Because she used it 3 years ago is considered signature. At least I can spell whatever I type. And you need references because eventually somebody else is going to delete it due to no reference. Art 281 00:10, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes if i put the time (2003-04) Yes!AquariusBoy01 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Why in the world would somebody put a signature move of a wrestler, that was last used 3 or 4 years ago.... Art 281 00:14, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A Good Editor would put it. AquariusBoy01 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Then it would have been done long time ago. Art 281 00:24, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Like 2 years ago i went on here to search for Torrie and Tornado DDT was there. And now i have become a user. AquariusBoy01 15 August 2007 (UTC)

That was 2 years ago. Art 281 00:28, 16 August 2007 (UTC) So?[reply]

Bad mistake, I have never reverted the article I have been to "Edit this page". Bad mistake. Art 281 00:28, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

nope reverted Tornado DDT. AquariusBoy01 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Since the entire dispute is being discussed here, I would like to add my two cents. Older signature moves shouldn't be deleted. This is an encyclopedia afterall. It's like saying we should delete World War I because it happened over 90 years ago and isn't "current". - Deep Shadow 00:30, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HA! Art 281 AquariusBoy01 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, Deep Shadow for proving my point. AquariusBoy01 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Michelle McCool

There was a discussion back then with the "European Uppercut", whether to leave it or not and we decided that it wasn't considered "Signature". Art 281 01:01, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well this will prove that it's a Backflip not a Handspring. Michelle McCool & The Big Show vs. Dawn Marie & Rene Dupree

Torrie Wilson and User:Art 281

Hiya. I don't see one word yet on Talk:Torrie Wilson. Why don't the two of you try and discuss the matter before you both end up blocked? Good luck, CitiCat^♫ 06:09, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thank you. But i think we might have finished that. And this guy is starting it on my page. AquariusBoy01 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Milena Roucka 2006.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Milena Roucka 2006.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:13, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Milena Leticia Roucka

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Milena Leticia Roucka, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Milena Leticia Roucka was previously deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD)

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Milena Leticia Roucka, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 16:01, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you beleive it?

Milena Roucka article is considered "deletion" Art 281 20:19, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know. User:AquariusBoy01

Gets me really pissed off that the article has references of all the stuff she has done, and is still deletion!. Geesh! There make developmental wrestlers article are worst than this one. Art 281 20:22, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Get over it you Big Baby, stop whining and try to make the article better or i am going to have to want to delete it! Like start by putting true info, she did not start out as Roucka!! And don't take true info, like she is in the "farm territory"... OVW. Get over it!!! Get your grammer right! User:AquariusBoy01 25 August 2007

Get my grammar right? Please look who is talking. Art 281 17:16, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, the article got deleted... Art 281 17:20, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me i have better grammar than you will ever have. User:AquariusBoy01 26 August 2007

Yeah right, look at this for example taken from Taryn Terrell article "And her club is Cheerleading". That's a fragment and you spell "grammar" like that not with an e. Look it up at a dictionary or here in wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Art 281 (talk • contribs) 04:23, August 27, 2007 (UTC)

It is not a fragment it went with the "sentence". So what i spelled it with an e, most people make that mistake. You put the article got "delete it" it is deleted. and "Milena Roucka is considered "deletion"" it is for "deletion". User:AquariusBoy01 27 August 2007

I didn't understand this part You put the article got "delete it" it is deleted. and "Milena Roucka is considered "deletion"" it is for "deletion". Art 281 22:36, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What? i did not understand a word you just typed. --AquariusBoy01 12:07, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OOO, you put Oh yeah, the article got delete it... Art 281 17:20, 26 August 2007 (UTC) that's wrong so i fixed it to be Oh yeah, the article got deleted... Art 281 17:20, 26 August 2007 (UTC) --AquariusBoy01 12:11, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube References

YouTube References are not an acceptable source for articles. I see you have put youtube as references on some articles, so I will delete it until you find an acceptable source. Art 281 16:38, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry you have to keep the move if you took some time to actually watch the video you would see that one of Torrie's moves is the Running tornado DDT, and Youtube is reliable. AquariusBoy01 16:48, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube is not realiabe is just is a popular video sharing website, does not meet Wikipedia's references guide. Art 281 12:48, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yeah it does, if it shows the person doing the move, it is reliable!!

Your right that does shows the person doing the move, but those not satisfied the time-line you provided for the move. And plus YouTube is not a realible source website for Wikipedia. Art 281 22:19, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 12:40, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spam

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to H. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Anomie 23:32, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Week-By-Week Events

Please stop adding to Kelly Kelly's article week-by-week events. Thank you.

Art 281 05:59, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Im sorry, but it is needed, It is an important event. AquariusBoy01 02:00, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not important in the overall scheme of her career. Please refrain from continuing to add week by week information, thank you. Bmg916^Speak 20:56, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eugene H. Krabs

Please do not restore this article. It was decided that the article lacked enough real-world information to warrant an article on its own. Thank you. I (talk) 19:18, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Krabs.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Krabs.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:25, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Award!!!!!!!!!!!!

		The Original Barnstar
		Here you go! Alex1996Ne (talk) 03:24, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why did i get a barnstar? AquariusBoy01 (talk) 21:17, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Germany Invitation

Hello, AquariusBoy01! I'd like to call your attention to the WikiProject Germany and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. I hope their links, sub-projects and discussions are interesting and even helpful to you. If not, I hope that new ones will be.

--Zeitgespenst (talk) 14:25, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm actually soon taking German is school, and I am German. So I may join in the near future. Thanks, for the invitation. JosephJames6 (talk) 02:56, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sandra Oh

Hi JosephJames6. I was wondering why you made this move. All reliable sources commonly refer to her as Sandra Oh. Thanks, Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 21:32, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, My mistake, somebody else. sorry JosephJames6 (talk) 21:34, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more careful about moving pages. It takes administrative tools to undo multiple moves like that. Thanks. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 21:38, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm Sorry, and I'll try to be more careful next time.JosephJames6 (talk) 21:40, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You just did the same thing again, with a few different articles. Please try to be even more careful, lest someone consider it vandalism. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:20, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for page moves

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. No more moving articles to strange titles. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:21, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:918081476_d5a7d91156.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:918081476_d5a7d91156.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? PhilKnight (talk) 23:36, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Creating hoax articles

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Natascha Glazcov, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Chelsea

Your move of Chelsea was inappropriate and has been undone. Please do not do this, or any other inappropriate entries, again. If you are unclear about why this was inappropriate please contact me at User talk:DJ Clayworth. DJ Clayworth (talk) 15:53, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Playboy

Thank you for experimenting with the page Playboy on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Kate Hudson

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you add defamatory content, as you did to Kate Hudson, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jonathan Cardy (talk) 18:28, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 55 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 18:35, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It appears your account has been compromised and as such, has been blocked indefinitely. -- Tawker (talk) 18:38, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JosephJames6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My little sister was doing all those edits, I was away on vacation in Italy for college.

Decline reason:

Then this account is correctly blocked as compromised; see Tawker above. — Sandstein 12:09, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Articles for deletion nomination of Beverly Mullins

I have nominated Beverly Mullins, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beverly Mullins. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. iMatthew ^talk at 02:38, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]