User talk:Archifile
A tag has been placed on Australian rugby union captains, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blair - Speak to me 05:31, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Helping you
[edit]- I would be pleased to help you, however, I am just about to walk out the door. How about if I move the page out of the main encyclopedia and you work on it in your own userspace? Then, when it's ready, I'd be happy to move it back to the main encyclopedia if it meets our requirements? I'm going to move the page to User:Archifile/Rugby and you can work on editing it there. If you have particular questions, please feel free to leave them here for me or on my talk page and I'll get them when I get back home. - Philippe | Talk 05:49, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- I believe the user was trying to create a category. I've replied to the comment on my talk page with the simplest way to fix this. Blair - Speak to me 05:55, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Newington College
[edit]
It goes without saying that admins are carefully watching edits related to this set of articles. There has been a disturbing amount of edit warring, quarrelling and assuming bad faith going on in edit summaries and on talk pages, as well as questionable additions to and removals from the articles in question. While the checkuser finding has come back fairly inconclusive, the behaviour of all parties is under scrutiny and breaches of policy will not be tolerated. If this warning is not heeded, blocks may well be the next stage. Orderinchaos 23:22, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
John Manton
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article John Manton, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. --Jame§ugrono 09:21, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Clive Lucas, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.clsparchitects.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:31, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
"Royal Australian Iinstitute of Architects Gold Medal" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Royal Australian Iinstitute of Architects Gold Medal. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 21#Royal Australian Iinstitute of Architects Gold Medal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 03:45, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
File:CowperWharfRdMemorial.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CowperWharfRdMemorial.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Felix QW (talk) 16:30, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
