User talk:Arcobelina

Stephen Larssons changes were undone because the article quoted has been verified. Stephen Larsson appears to have changed the wiki to make things appear less obnoxious. the facts are the facts. Borsak is an elephant shooter and the article explains his thoughts on killing elephants

Edit warring at Tony Abbott

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. IgnorantArmies (talk) 04:12, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

See Talk:Tony Abbott#Not an Australian? for the most recent discussion. There is no support among other editors for adding conspiracy theories about Tony Abbott's citizenship to his Wikipedia page, for good reason. Your edits violate Wikipedia's policy on having a neutral point of view, especially giving undue weight to fringe theories. IgnorantArmies (talk) 04:15, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. IgnorantArmies (talk) 04:51, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Tony Abbott. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Bilby (talk) 05:15, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arcobelina (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am posting facts,I am posting documents produced by Mr Abbotts office,I am posting links to those documents, I am posting stuff that the Liberal Party of Australia does not want made public. It would appear those calling this an edit war are probably party members or employees. Have you checked that? The document I am posting is that illegal or not allowed? posting documents from his own department would be normal practice for any other political leader Will you block those who started this edit war from making changes to my edits/ Will you confirm what I am posting is legal to post on Abbotts page. Will you unblock me from posting. Arcobelina (talk) 05:26, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are blocked for edit warring; you must address this and only this in your unblock request. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 06:54, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If I post factual evidence to the Abbott wiki and someone else deletes it am I guilty of edit warring or are they? wiki they be banned from making changes to my additions? Why are the admin supporting the money behind the control of social media, and Wiki is part of the social media spend of $4.3 million dollars by Tony Abbott to make sure no one posts the truth. So If I post and someone changes the post will they be guilty of edit warring by continuing the ridiculousness? Will I have to go through this same rigmarole or will admin be watching for ignorantarmies etal continuing the edit war? Who determines what is proper for the living biography? I would think facts form his own office would be acceptable. any thoughts admin? Arcobelina (talk) 08:58, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Re: paid by Abbott

Sorry, but I believe you're mistaken — I don't think I've edited any articles relating to Tony Abbott. In fact, until I saw your article pop up in the list of new articles, I don't believe I had even heard of him. Trivialist (talk) 03:21, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User talk:Trivialist, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 03:37, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Tony Magrathea for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tony Magrathea is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Magrathea until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:45, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

April 2015

Please do not write or add to an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Tony Magrathea. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. IgnorantArmies (talk) 06:53, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tony Abbott's birth certificate.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tony Abbott's birth certificate.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:04, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

January 2021

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Scott Morrison. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. – Teratix ₵ 02:07, 22 January 2021 (UTC)