User talk:ArcusLordOfGods

March 2019[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Acroterion (talk) 12:19, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ArcusLordOfGods (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was abused by an admin.

Decline reason:

You state that you want to cancel your account, meaning that you don't intend to edit. As such, there is no reason to unblock you. If you don't wish to use or edit Wikipedia anymore, simply stop. If you are paying for your account, I'm not sure who you are paying, because Wikipedia does not charge money to have an account. The Wikimedia Foundation collects donations from those who wish to do so, but it isn't required to donate to have an account. Donations to the Foundation or the lack thereof have no effect on what goes on here; otherwise, anyone could pay or threaten to withhold donations to get their preferred content on this encyclopedia that tries to be neutral. If you change your mind and want to be unblocked, you need to better address why others think you are a sockpuppet when you are not instead of complaining about "abuse". I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 10:38, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In March I stated pretty simply that by doing my own research and reading every three thoroughly on the Fascism Wiki-page, I found that there was no correlation to the Left-Right Wing spectrum. Someone informs me that although I believe the problem is due to political bias, nothing can be changed without an artical or publication from an author. Then, I get blocked from editing and accused of being a sock puppet for Stormcloak Ethnonationalist without ANY EVIDENCE on the Admin's part. They never contacted me or anything and there is no proof on their part that I am guilty of anything. I have done just as the Wiki policy asks and gave my say without being rude or disrespectful. I did not pursue the argument, just as the Wiki policy asks of us. And yet here I am, unjustly banned because one of the Admins doesn't like other people's opinions. I am going to cancel my subscription, because why should I pay for a website that abuses its power to silence those who would question its actions? Kinda sounds like Fascism to me, but what do I know? ArcusLordOfGods (talk) 06:40, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There's no such thing as a Wikipedia subscription, and nobody pays for access. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:03, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would add that you are not being censored, but as a private website Wikipedia can dictate what goes on here, just as you can dictate what is said and done in your own residence. 331dot (talk) 10:40, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You must not remove declined unblock requests while you are still blocked, so please do not do that again. I've reverted your blanking of the page. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:59, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]