User talk:Armon/Archive 1 Nov 2007

Southern California InFocus

Hi Armon, Question, why did you restore THF's version here? [1] Bigglove 17:57, 31 August 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The Tags are no vandalism

I assure you that the Anti-Americanism tags have no hidden agenda. I am studying the phenomenon. In Category:Anti-Americanism, I responded to the following tag: {{popcat}}

Mohonu 11:20, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that you've categorized a bunch of people "Anti-American" who may not identify as such. Being a socialist doesn't quite cut it according to WP:BLP. Also, you've categorized entire countries, like North Korea, "Anti-American". You're painting with a really wide brush. <<-armon->> 01:26, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish Defense League

I've tried to apply the same principles of WP:SOAP there, but people seem to have no interest in listening. I will keep trying to make my edit stick but am already ar three reversions. Let me know if there are more articles with these sorts of problems. Thanks. -- 67.98.206.2 18:16, 10 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Blocked for Disruptive editing on Battle of Jenin

I have blocked you and Burgas00 for editwarring on this article. You guys know that editwarring like this is not a good thing. Editwarring is disruptive. When your block expires I hope that both of you can discuss things in a civil manner on the talk page. Best of luck. —— Eagle101^{Need help?} 02:51, 12 September 2007 (UTC) {unblock|OK I don't actually understand this block. If you look at the history and the talk page. The episode was already over, and I'd just made an edit and asked him if it was OK. Burgas00 had already said on talk he was going to review the cites because other editors had disagreed with his edits. I don't see why either of us should be blocked. Please unblock both of us. Cheers Armon}[reply]

Agreed with the above. Eagle101's blocking of Armon and Burgas00 in this case does not make sense and strikes me as being punitive and blocks are not meant to be punishment. Kyaa the Catlord 09:01, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Eagle101 was somehow right but since both you and Burgas00 agreed to cool it down then the block is being lifted now Request handled by: FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up®} 11:49, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks FayssalF. Hope you unblocked Burgas00 also. <<-armon->> 12:07, 12 September 2007 (UTC) I see you did. Cheers. <<-armon->> 12:09, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i did. Please continue your civil discussion but avoid edit warring guys. -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up®} 12:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Armon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Armon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Armon". The reason given for Armon's block is: "Disruptive editing on Battle of Jenin. You guys know editwarring is disruptive, please stop when this bloc

Blocking administrator: Eagle 101 (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: The autoblocker tool is currently broken, so unfortunately I can't lift the autoblock unless you provide your IP address. So you'll either have to wait 24 hours for it to auto expire or contact an administrator who your trust privately. -- Netsnipe ► 04:45, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AN/I#PalestineRemembered_IV

Per WP:AN/I#PalestineRemembered_IV are you prepared to accept me as PalestineRemembered's mentor?Geni 01:18, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]