User talk:ArmordHawk 001

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, ArmordHawk 001! I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Marek.69 ^talk 00:11, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for on the basis of your edits (and in particular the recent ones in which you added claims that the Philippines uses two different types of guns referenced to sources which don't support this claim) I believe that you are the vandal who has been targeting articles relating to the Philippines' military for the past year or so. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Nick-D (talk) 11:00, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ArmordHawk 001 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I found no reason for blocking me since my last edit was in fact true.

Decline reason:

WP:TRUTH is not as important as verifiability and reliable sources. You do appear to be making the same if not similar edits as another user. The continual attempt to use sources that do not actually support what you say, or make edits that are clearly against consensus is disruptive. Consider these policies that I have linked, then re-read the policy on unblocks, then perhaps rethink your unblock request. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:02, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.