User talk:Arnaeus

Hello, Arnaeus, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you neeпа d help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 23:14, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

- - - --Arnaeus (talk) 16:33, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Arnaeus[edit]

Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

Bensci54 (talk) 16:53, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedy deleted as an attack or a negative unsourced biography of a living person, because... (your reason here) --Arnaeus (talk) 16:55, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019[edit]

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. GSS ^💬 16:58, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mary Gofnof[edit]

Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

Bensci54 (talk) 16:59, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 17:01, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 17:01, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re Stipe (one of your recent offenses)[edit]

   My, you certainly are quick on the draw, as fans of the Old West would say; i observe for your edification that careers based on that skill were proverbally short. But I have you at a disadvantage, so i hasten to remediate]]. (I also should mention that as a relative newcomer, you may not have yet become accustomed to the local standards of participation, which could become far more problematic than you might guess based solely on your experience elsewhwere on the Web.)
   Colleagiality is a major virtue, and survival trait, here. I for example, followed up my edit with a fairly detailed account of unusual factors and long-term considerations, on the corresponding article talk page. It appears you gave yourself no opportunity to consult. (You may come to appreciate that describing what one is about to do is a fool's game: no task worthy of serious attention is as simple as it appears at first glance, so one almost always knows more after completion than before; in fact, it's often silly to explain what you're about to do, in light of what you'll be able to add, once your task has made you not only a bit wiser, but especially so as concerns the details of the particular task.
   That edit of mine was no exception, and there's no point in boring you with the details. Had you given yourself time to puzzle over why i concievably could have chosen to change the existing prose, your response could well have put my comments to shame.   So having stated the slightly bigger picture to my satifaction, i shall see whether you've followed up by showing me courtesy comparable to what i am showing you.... though my configuation makes it awkward and occasionally occasions retyping the same thoughts. There's no rush.
--JerzyA (talk) 18:46, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm saving a copy of my above reply to the user who reverted my last main-namespace edit. It may be appropriate at some future time. Oh, yeah! And thanks, Caped Crusader!

Gosh, i thot i was dealing with a defensive editor, not a random vandal.--JerzyA (talk) 18:58, 28 October 2019 (UTC)<br[reply]