User talk:Arnav Bhate
This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Arnav_Bhate. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Wrong input of Air India's A350-900s
[edit]Hi @Arnav_Bhate, the data you put for A350-900s is wrong. Only 2 have been delivered to Air India. I don't think you can include it in the fleet if they are not delivered. Source: https://www.planespotters.net/airline/Air-India
even here you can see that they only put 2 A350-900s in "In Service" column and 4 A350-900s are in 'future' column. I hope that everything is clarified now, and that my edit was correct only. Please stop editing it wrong. Kokofruitkt (talk) 11:26, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- Airbus is more reliable than planespotters. If Airbus says they delivered 6 A350s then we say Air India got 6 A350s. The Airbus source is already in the article. Please see it. Arnav Bhate (talk) 15:16, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ahh yes, they are delivered yet have not started operations. For them, if they have painted the livery and tests are done, then they consider it as delivered. By that logic, there are many Air India's a320 neos, that are already in Toulousse, waiting for delivery. Should include them in the fleet too, according to your logic. Kokofruitkt (talk) 02:23, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- And btw you can clearly see that the column where you are editing wrong, clearly says "in service". How is a plane in 'in service' if it's in Toulousse? The column doesn't say "total planes". Kokofruitkt (talk) 04:26, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- Provide a source for that. As you can see here, Airbus says AI is operating all 6 A350s that they have delivered. Arnav Bhate (talk) 06:15, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- Show me their flight history from flight radar, if they are operating them. You should prove, since you are the one changing it. Bet you don't even know their registrations, so here they are :VT-JRE, VT-JRF, VT-JRH, VT-JRI. Show me their flight history. And like I said, you should also add the A320 neos which are not even delivered, according to your logic. Kokofruitkt (talk) 13:20, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- I do know their registrations. Also, where does the Airbus source say Air India is operating more than 41 A320neos? The latest report, in January says 38 and since then 3 more have been delivered. I have provided a source that says Air India is operating them, it is up to you to provide one that says Air India isn't. Also, we have included aircraft that planespotters says are parked in the in service tally. Arnav Bhate (talk) 03:15, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- You know what, keep editing it wrong, no one even trusts wikipedia lol, cuz it is an open source website, edited by people like you. Kokofruitkt (talk) 02:19, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- I only want a source that says Air India doesn't have them that would be more reliable than Airbus, while also being up-to-date, so I can put it in the article. Probably the only source that meets this is Air India itself. Arnav Bhate (talk) 06:40, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- You just want source, even if it says wrong. Airbus clearly has weong data, or I think they consider a plane delivered, once they are done with tests. But Air India hasn't taken the delivery of 4 aircrafts. Till now only VT-JRA and VT-JRB are delivered. You can even check Air India's twitter, their last post about A350, was their 2nd A350 which is A350. And yes they do tweet about all the new A350 deliveries. So if they all the 6 were delivered, then they would have tweeted about it. But till now only 2 A350s are delivered according to their twitter.
- x.com/airindia/status/1753780106651443299?s=20 Kokofruitkt (talk) 08:12, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- I see another user has added a source. That source seems fine so I will let it be. Arnav Bhate (talk) 07:35, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- I only want a source that says Air India doesn't have them that would be more reliable than Airbus, while also being up-to-date, so I can put it in the article. Probably the only source that meets this is Air India itself. Arnav Bhate (talk) 06:40, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- You know what, keep editing it wrong, no one even trusts wikipedia lol, cuz it is an open source website, edited by people like you. Kokofruitkt (talk) 02:19, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- I do know their registrations. Also, where does the Airbus source say Air India is operating more than 41 A320neos? The latest report, in January says 38 and since then 3 more have been delivered. I have provided a source that says Air India is operating them, it is up to you to provide one that says Air India isn't. Also, we have included aircraft that planespotters says are parked in the in service tally. Arnav Bhate (talk) 03:15, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Show me their flight history from flight radar, if they are operating them. You should prove, since you are the one changing it. Bet you don't even know their registrations, so here they are :VT-JRE, VT-JRF, VT-JRH, VT-JRI. Show me their flight history. And like I said, you should also add the A320 neos which are not even delivered, according to your logic. Kokofruitkt (talk) 13:20, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- Provide a source for that. As you can see here, Airbus says AI is operating all 6 A350s that they have delivered. Arnav Bhate (talk) 06:15, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Sorting in IR electrification tables
[edit]You undid my edit of the Indian Railways electrification stat tables in Central Organisation for Railway Electrification claiming that it "Does not do anything". What it does is exclude the summary line from sorting. Without it, if you click on any of the column headers to sort according to that column, the sum will also be considered, which produces odd results if you click the first column (State resp. Zone in alphabetic order) or the last column (where the percentage for the total is the weighed mean of the states/zones and thus will be somewhere in the middle). Even for the other two columns, it's still weird to have the sum on top when you set the table in descending order.
So I reverted your revert, but I posted a more detailed explanation here. Rontombontom (talk) 13:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
May 2024
[edit] Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Vande Metro: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Rahio1234 08:52, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Hey Arnav, I've found some information stating the features regarding this service as well as the Vande Bharat Sleeper trainset. Should I add them in the trainset page or in the main page?? This is for both the upcoming types of train services. Reference has been shared to you:- [1] Do check them out and let me know when and under which page to be added. Thank you. Sameer2905 (talk) 16:11, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- In the Vande Metro an Vande Bharat (sleeper trainset) pages. Do try to find the original article rather than the one from MSN. Arnav Bhate (talk) 16:37, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Arnav Bhate,
- Whatever points mentioned in the MSN is a subpage of the original news article from Times of India, which I later found out. If that's fine from your end, then ONLY will I add those designated points but in simple English to those article pages. Sameer2905 (talk) 01:31, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
AFDs
[edit]Hello, Arnav Bhate,
Please do not post so many AFDs all at once. We have a limited number of editors who participate in AFD discussions and having to evaluate dozens or articles and sources places a burden on them. I expect low participation in most of these and several relistings of discussions. It's just overwhelming for editors to have to assess this many articles over just a week. Please consider withdrawing some and listing them again in the future and don't ever do this again. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:01, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- The category Indian express train stubs contains more than 600 articles, the majority of which are these types of articles, that I would want deleted. When such a large number of articles are posted as a bundle, editors complain that they don't have enough time to do WP:BEFORE on them. This is the reason I have posted each article individually. Also, you would find that all these articles are stubs, which would not take such a long time to evaluate. If you provide some other alternative, I would gladly pursue it next time. Arnav Bhate (talk) 09:41, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- You don't have to bundle all 600 articles at once, maybe like 20 a week should be fine. You'll get less opposition if you start with the least notable of the bunch, most of these seem to be unnamed trains with the titles made up by the author in the format "[TERMINAL A] - [TERMINAL B] [FREQUENCY] [SERVICE TYPE]". Once most of the easy cruft is dealt with then you can start individually nominating. You could also reach out to the user FOARP who is working/worked on AfDing a large batch of articles also in the transport category (airline destination lists), maybe they could also provide advice on what you are trying to do Jumpytoo Talk 05:30, 31 July 2024 (UTC)