User talk:Arrowe6365

August 2024

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Southern Diocese, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to Draft:Southern Diocese where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. AusLondonder (talk) 18:48, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Southern Diocese

The article Southern Diocese has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Zero secondary sources. Fails WP:ORGCRIT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 18:57, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Northern Diocese

The article Northern Diocese has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Zero secondary sources. Fails WP:ORGCRIT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 18:59, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John Fenwick (bishop)

The article John Fenwick (bishop) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No secondary sources. Much of the content is unsourced. Fails WP:BASIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 19:00, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Saleem Bhatti

The article Saleem Bhatti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No secondary sources. Fails WP:BASIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 19:02, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]