Jump to content

User talk:Arthistorian1977/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5→Archive 10

New Page Review - newsletter No.2

Hello Arthistorian1977,
A HUGE backlog

We now have 803 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.

Hitting 17,000 soon

The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.

Second set of eyes

Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.

Abuse

This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and

  1. this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting in a community ban.
  2. this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in a community ban.
  3. This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election

Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections

Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Hak Chhay Hok

Dear Aethistorian1977, I don't understand why you want to delete this. Did you read it? I'm a scholar, specialist of Cambodian literature. Hak Chhay is an important Cambodian writer in the 1960's. Please look. My references are good. With Best regards, Domrey sar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Domrey sar (talk • contribs) 07:55, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Hak Chhay Hok

Dear Arthistorian1977 Cambodian writer " Hak Chhay Hok" died in 1975 during the Khmer Rouge. What did I received this warning : "All biographies of living people created after March 2010 must have at least one reference to a reliable source that supports at least one statement"? Could you help me please ? Best, Domrey Sar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Domrey sar (talk • contribs) 08:10, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.3

Hello Arthistorian1977,

Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.

Still a MASSIVE backlog

We now have 803 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Verz Design

Hello Arthistorian1977. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Verz Design, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims coverage in reliable sources. Thank you. SoWhy 13:14, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Arthistorian1977/sandbox

Hello, Arthistorian1977. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 06:32, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Ninney. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Trim Browser, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Ninney (talk) 20:46, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Trim Browser Is Now cnet.com Publish http://download.cnet.com/Trim-Browser-Mini/3000-2150_4-77481942.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ismailim (talk • contribs) 22:58, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Arthistorian1977, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Lord Roem ~ (talk) 19:21, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Thank you!. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:29, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4

Hello Arthistorian1977,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 803 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Socotec

Re: the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia - its important enough to be included in the french wikipedia encyclopedia, does that not count? Originalwana (talk) 11:30, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Originalwana I don't see correspondent article in French.Arthistorian1977 (talk) 12:09, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Originalwana Actually, I found it, but the French article is also marked as "may not satisfy notability guidelines". Arthistorian1977 (talk) 12:10, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Ok fair enough. If you delete the English article, does that mean the French one will also go? Originalwana (talk) 14:23, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

We're on Twitter!

WikiLGBT is on Twitter!
Hello Arthistorian1977!
Follow the Wikimedia LGBT user group on Twitter at @wikilgbt for news, photos, and other topics of interest to LGBT Wikipedans and allies. Use #wikiLGBT to share any Wiki Loves Pride stuff that you would like to share (whether this month or any day of the year) or to alert folks to things that the LGBT Wikipedan community should know. RachelWex (talk)

RachelWex 15:57, 15 June 2017 (UTC) Hi Arthistorian77 (talk)! I would love to give you a shout out on @wikiLGBT for your work (and the work of others) to get the LGBT films and film stars featured at the 2017 LGBT Tel Aviv Film Festival on Wikipedia. If you can follow us on Twitter and post some stuff about what you all are doing, that would be great! RachelWex 15:57, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Deletion Amir Bakhsh Birmani. Why?

Sir, i added legal information. Can i ask about deletion of Amir Bakhsh Birmani? If im wrong, then dont mind. May be this is wrong. I know you have much experience. Rahat Amir (talk) 05:56, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Muhammad khawas khan

Hello Arthistorian1977, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Muhammad khawas khan, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: gained fame for his literary pursuits is a clear assertion of importance sufficient to avoid A7. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 07:28, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

proofreading on Hebrew wiki בית הכנסת הישן (ארפורט)

Hello Arthistorian1977, I found you on the list of native Hebrew speakers. Would you mind proofreading a simplied version of the English page Old Synagogue (Erfurt) which I've created in Hebrew? - בית הכנסת הישן (ארפורט) The page isn't very long. If you don't want to do it I completely understand, but could you please let me know so that I can ask someone else. Thank you.Felixkrater (talk) 08:59, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Felixkrater I will gladly look at it. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 20:58, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Villages in Bosnia

Hello. I see that you follow and review my work on villages in Bosnia. I plan to complete all missing pages with these basic information. Later, additional info will be added. The fact is, there is no any significant info on these locations, that can be supported with reliable sources, so not all will be updates. Thank you for everything so far. --EngiZe (talk) 14:34, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Anarchyte. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Mujahida Hussain Bibi, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Anarchyte (work | talk) 03:21, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Giuseppe de' Medici, 2 Prince of Ottajano

Can you please add your sources to this? The WP:BURDEN is on the creator to do so. Thanks for starting the article, Boleyn (talk) 07:26, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

The Castle Centre

I don't understand the reasoning for removing this page. It's local authority run, not commercial, and it is important in the context of nearby buildings because the developer was forced to pay for this leisure centre in lieu of providing affordable social housing. In addition to that many other council-run leisure centres have their own pages on Wikipedia. This is why I rarely edit Wikipedia, I take time to create pages and people just come along and delete them! It's no wonder there aren't more contributors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kicsinyul (talk • contribs) 14:45, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Re: Chinedu Echeruo's Page

Re: Chinedu Echeruo's Page
Hi,

I don't know how to reply to your discussion for deletion of Chinedu Echeruo's page, so I'm trying this avenue. Chinedu's work expands beyond HopStop, so why limit his name to the redirect? The Wikipedia law you are referring to even states not to take the materials on the page seriously. If we did, no entrepreneur would be posted on Wikipedia.

Chinedu is known for HopStop, but he is evolving - he's done Tripology, he's working on MindMeet.us, etc. So I think the individual page is necessary so people see it's not just HopStop he's done.

I hope this makes sense. Thank you! Mariaabalu (talk) 16:58, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy delete of Self-balancing scooter (personal transporter)

Self-balancing scooter (personal transporter) has now been deleted even though I have given a justification for it's creation on the associated talk page prior your adding the speedy delete banner and after two people had provided responses to the speedy delete challenge on the talk page explaining why it should be retained. Could you please review and reinstate? Thanks. PeterEastern (talk) 04:58, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Arthistorian1977, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
  • Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.

Technology update:

  • Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Wikipedia:Page Curation/Suggested improvements
  • The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:

General project update:

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Robert McClenon. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, EasyCap, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:18, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Revert

You reverted my comment to WP:Articles_for_deletion/Porinju_Veliyath. Can you please provide a rationale for that? I suggest you have a look at my talk page for background before replying. 84.73.134.206 (talk) 06:09, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Kenny Browne and Paddy Barrett

These players have easily done enough to be considered "notable" These are pages i worked very hard to create as I ask you please not to delete. JohnnyTheWhite99 (talk) 22:14, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Kudpung. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Roshan Vichare, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:39, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Denis Katsyv, Arthistorian1977.

Unfortunately Anarchyte has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

I've removed the A7 tag because there are many available references that could be used to indicate notability. Try AFD if you wish to go forward with deletion.

To reply, leave a comment on Anarchyte's talk page.

Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:35, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Bigg Boss Aarav Nafeez

He has acted in more than 300 advertisement and he is a successful Tamil model. And now he is one of the contestants of BIGG BOSS TAMIL .So I think if we add an article about him or info about him it will be a necessary one for the Tamil people. It will give an opportunity to all to know about him.

Now Suggest Me. Joshua Immanuel Saviour Lavy (talk) 12:54, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Message on Commons

Your input on Commons admin noticeboard in correlation with your AIV post would be helpful. — Maile (talk) 13:10, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Giuseppe de' Medici, 2 Prince of Ottajano

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Arthistorian1977, thanks for creating Giuseppe de' Medici, 2 Prince of Ottajano!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Referencing needs improving.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 15:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Mizal Zaini AfD tag

Hi, I saw that you replace the AfD tag that was removed by the author on this page. While normally, I would agree that this is not an edit I would want an author performing, there currently is not an AfD for this article. It appears the tag may have been placed incorrectly, or by accident. I reached out to the editor who tagged the page explaining they needed to create the AfD, and welcome you to do so if they haven't done it if you feel the page needs to be deleted. If the author continues after the AfD goes live, I will make sure to take the appropriate measures. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:58, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Cabayi. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Lewis reeves, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Cabayi (talk) 11:07, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Cabayi. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Vignan's Institute Of Information Technology, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Cabayi (talk) 11:09, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

In what way is either of these articles worthy of being tagged as reviewed. Given that any user can remove the PROD tags you're effectively giving the articles a free-pass should the PROD tags be removed. I'm un-reviewing them again. Cabayi (talk) 15:41, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Cabayi. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Vignan's Institute Of Information Technology, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Cabayi (talk) 15:42, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Cabayi. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Lewis reeves, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Cabayi (talk) 15:43, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Peela Govinda Satyanarayana

Your review of Peela Govinda Satyanarayana while it had a CSD pending meant that, after the CSD was declined, the article was left as reviewed in this state which clearly needed more attention. It didn't help that the CSD nominator doesn't appear to keep a CSD log so the article effectively disappeared off of everybody's radar and got a free pass through NPP. Please review more carefully. Cabayi (talk) 19:10, 24 July 2017 (UTC) Hi Cabayi, thank you for your attention, but I follow articles I review in order to check if their status is changed and they require additional attention. Cheers. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 20:59, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Declined speedy delete

I declined your speedy deletion nomination of Krishna Kumar Chatterjee. They were a candidate for the office of President of India, that is a claim to significance. ~ GB fan 13:12, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Studyabroadaide.com

Hello i just got message that -Speedy deletion nomination of Studyabroadaide.com

And it is not useful enough to be included in the Wikipedia.

I will just give you 3 points for telling importance of studyabroadaide.com and would like you should also contribute to that Wikipedia page with all your expertise to make it better.

1.This Website rank 10491 in Syria http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/studyabroadaide.com ; It is relay very important for the people there to divert there attention to education with all that devastation because of war and Studyabroadaide.com is providing free education materials for them.

2.Studyabroadaide.com posted its first article July 5, 2017, http://studyabroadaide.com/commonwealth-countries-list/ and within month it got ranked in few best performing websites in - Syrian Arab Republic - Jordan - Bangladesh

3. This website is not for profit website wholly managed by students with a motto of helping people in need.

I wish you will re consider your decision and make this Wikipedia page available to all, and also add value to this page by your generous contribution. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ansariadnan33 (talk • contribs) 16:31, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Doctor Who, The Showcase Series

Just a friendly heads up on Doctor Who, The Showcase Series. You nominated this for speedy deletion under A1, but the title alone was enough to give context (youtube series). I deleted it under A7, non-notable web content.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:23, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Daniel Cepeda, Arthistorian1977.

Unfortunately Classicwiki has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

As far as I can tell this article is poorly sourced and is most likely a hoax.

To reply, leave a comment on Classicwiki's talk page.

Classicwiki (talk) (ping me please) 14:30, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm IVORK. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Yasin Osman, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. — IVORK Discuss 14:42, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk page archiving

Hey, as this is your 213th section on the talk page, I have decided to add the auto-archive script for Miszabot to archive articles older than 90 days. Feel free to revert my changes if this is not something you want. It is afterall your talk page. — IVORK Discuss 21:52, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Answering your comment on the Tal Itzhaki article

Hi, I'm sfine8 (Dr Sarah Fine, USA), main contributor to the above mentioned article. Thank you for reviewing my article. I think it was you who commented that some words describing in the article the design work of Ms Itzhaki, the subject of the article, are "too subjective." Let me just comment that ALL the words you cite as examples ("legendary", etc) are cited with references to theatre critics from leading newpapers in Israel (such as Maariv, Al HaMishmar, Ha'Ir", etc). Theses refer to designs which gotmthe subject of the article prizes and citations. I fail to see in what way these references (cited in full with page numbers of their sources) fall into the category of "too subjective." I would strongly suggest you will consider removing that note. As for your other suggestions, I will study them very carefully. Have a great day, sfine8. sfine8 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:39, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Robertgombos. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Jio Pagla, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Robert G. (talk) 14:32, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Abdullah Al-Salloum

Dear Arthistorian1977,

I believe this article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because:

1. Source #1 is an evidence proving that the subject's book was ranked the 2nd in best-selling on the biggest Arabic bookstore. I will work on the article an add more sources proving that in a few.

2. Mentioned on the first paragraph that the subject "has received recognition for his bibliography and publications on the principles of political economics." as per all the given independent sources, which speak of his works.

Is there any more specific concerns that I should be taking care of in improving the article to satisfy the criteria in your point of view? Please advise.

UPDATE: I have improved the article. Explanations on its Talk page. Kindly let me know if you see them, yet, insufficient.

Sincerely, --Aaehasa (talk) 12:58, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Abdullah Al-Salloum

Hello Arthistorian1977. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Abdullah Al-Salloum, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 14:23, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thanks for marking pages as reviewed! You come up often in my watchlist.

‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 14:28, 15 August 2017 (UTC)


Peace Treaty between USA and North Korea

Dear Arthistorian1977, Concerning the "Peace Treaty between USA and North Korea" Can you please let me know how can I review the previous content of the article subject : Peace Treaty between USA and North Korea?

  • Alternatively, Would you please locate the deleted article to the page below?
  • "Special:Mypage/Peace Treaty between USA and North Korea"

I was trying to check the previous contents "Peace Treaty between USA and North Korea", however it was unable to check it with my account

  • (Please refer to that I asked also it to Hut 8.5 as Hut 8.5 is also related with this article)

Have a great day. Goodtiming8871 (talk) 00:22, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Anthony T. Rinaldi

Anthony T. Rinaldi Is an renowned engineer and businessman from us he is selected and interviewed by FOX Business news.Bullus 14:14, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Bobble Keyboard

Hello Please check i have change the article again i think it should be available in Wikipedia. Bullus 14:15, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

PROD with no rationale

Why did you PROD this article? You must explain why it should be deleted. KGirl (Wanna chat?) 14:27, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Timothyjosephwood. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Dragon (2017 film), and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

TimothyJosephWood 14:44, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Arthistorian1977, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.

Technology update:

  • Rentier has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.

General project update:

  • The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
  • Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
  • To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Karan Guliani

Hello Arthistorian1977. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Karan Guliani, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: directing a notable film indicates significance. Thank you. SoWhy 15:38, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Grand Duke Gediminas Staff Battalion

I'm curious why you reviewed Grand Duke Gediminas Staff Battalion without tagging it. What notability criteria do believe it meets? Chris Troutman (talk) 22:02, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi Chris Troutman. Thank you for contacting me. I've looked at the google search and found quite enough sources mentioning the topic. So, for my understanding, WP:GNG is met here. Cheers, Arthistorian1977 (talk) 05:00, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Ok. I didn't search on the topic; I always look for the claim of notability the article shows. I tagged it because it doesn't make a claim of general notability and the subject arguably fails WP:MILUNIT. I get your thinking on it. Thanks. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:04, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi Chris Troutman. I tend to search for a least simple google search prior to tagging an article. In this case I reviewed it since I saw clear pass of WP:GNG with quite enough sources. In case of WP:MILUNIT I were probably just skipping it, since my personal specialization is art, history and LGBT+ studies. Cheers. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 15:09, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

A recently deleted article

Greetings!

You have recently deleted an article called 'Hristo Iliev MMA Promoter'. May I ask why it was removed? Thank you in advance!

Best regards, Todor Ivanov — Preceding unsigned comment added by ТодорИвановВр (talk • contribs) 15:48, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Establishment of First Islamic State

This topic is not copy of any content. Why you nominated this topic for speedy delection. Mosvi2014 (talk) 15:54, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Business and Commercial Powers of Attorney

When a page is moved from article space to draft space, a redirect should not be provided. If you have the Page Mover right, please uncheck the box for a redirect (which is on by default). If you do not have the Page Mover right, please tag the resulting redirect as R2. I have tagged it as R2. (If I were an admin, I would just delete the redirect.) Thank you for using your judgment about the page. Robert McClenon (talk) 09:44, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

CAP

Thanks for reviewing New York City Group, Civil Air Patrol. I stand by my original PROD. The author added a single third-party reference and removed the tag. Your opinion, please: Just accept it, a unit description with one press mention and lots of chest-puffing from CAP-controlled sites, or AfD it and let the discussions begin? Taking the slow road before I apply for reviewer status. Thanks Rhadow (talk) 22:16, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Hristo Iliev MMA Promoter /recently deleted/

Hello!

I need to ask - why do you keep tagging my articles for deletion. I would really appreciate a response by you.

ТодорИвановВр (talk) 20:24, 29 August 2017 (UTC) Hi ТодорИвановВр and thank you for your contributions. I patrol and review articles on constant basis. Those, which are not notable and not suit to encyclopedia are marked for deletion. Cheers, Arthistorian1977 (talk) 20:26, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for your swift response, but may I ask what criteria the article fails to meet. Hristo Iliev is one of the rising names in MMA and I believe he has a place in Wikipedia. At the least, a lot of people ask for his Wikipedia page on his last few events. He may not be Dana White or Don King, but he is a recognizable name as an MMA promoter in Europe. ТодорИвановВр (talk) 21:02, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

ТодорИвановВр Here is people's notability criteria: Wikipedia:Notability (people). Please, look at it. Every article marked for deletion is assessed by admin. Since it was deleted, admin agreed with me, he is not yet notable or the article didn't emphasize it enough. I advise you to create a Draft and then submit it true Articles for Creation process to avoid unnecessary frustration. You may even ask me to asses the Draft before submission. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 21:16, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Stub sorting

Please don't use the {{Stub}} tag if you can find a more specific stub tag; stub sort when you can. To do otherwise will backlog Category:Stubs. Thank you. -- I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 09:16, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Bobble Keyboard

Hello @Arthistorian1977: As you reviewed the page there are two IP user which are intentionally editing the page and try to delete the page as you go to contribution section of this two IP user there are no other contribution unless this page so please help me in this matter or block this page from edit war.

Regards Bullus 10:22, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Following

Thanks for following me and fixing my mistakes. I'm looking forward to making my own review mistakes when I get reviewer status. In the mean time, I have six in the queue, which I would be unqualified to review anyway. Thanks. Rhadow (talk) 15:00, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

World Finance Magazine

WFM was reviewed with a PROD tag. I understand that a review reflects a judgement of the article and tag together. It is not a Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval independent of the tag. The author thanked you for the (apparently positive) review and deleted the PROD tag without any other change. Rhadow (talk) 16:29, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Parallel force

Just a friendly note on Parallel force. I declined your speedy deletion nomination, because the context was clear. You might want to review the requirements for A1, as they are pretty narrow. Cheers!--Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:51, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Power~enwiki. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Power~enwiki (talk) 19:23, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

International Shostakovich Chamber Music Competition - patrol request

Dear Arthistorian,

Would you, please, patrol the recently created article about the classical music competition. Thank you! Sincerely, --LPdynasty (talk) 19:18, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for your input. I will improve the article further to include more details about the second edition. --LPdynasty (talk) 06:04, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi Arthistorian1977, I finally got around some new data to put into the article and get it into a better shape. But I cannot find it anymore. Where is that draft space you mentioned? --LPdynasty (talk) 12:59, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Thanks so much, Arthistorian1977! I have added some info, and moved the article back to the main space. I don't like the structure so far. But I can't figure out the way how to do it better. You also mentioned formatting. I agree, but once again not sure what is the direction to go? You obviously have a great experience + knowledge in art and music. Would you consider improving the article? Also, I think it is not very necessary to split different editions into the separate articles, they are essentially have strong attributions to the main event and share members of the jury and founding organizations. Thanks again! --LPdynasty (talk) 13:38, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Arthistorian1977, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
  • Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!

Technology update:

  • The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: T175225

General project update:

  • On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
  • Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
  • To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Yaniv d'Or

Hello, I see you created an article for Yaniv D'Or. Yaniv's own website spells his name as "Yaniv d'Or", so I think it would be appropriate to modify the article title to match. Would you be happy to take care of that?

Thanks,

86.187.172.151 (talk) 00:09, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

http://www.yanivdor.com/about — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.187.172.151 (talk) 00:10, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Insertcleverphrasehere. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Gazetted Officer (Kenya), and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

— InsertCleverPhraseHere (or here) 14:56, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Insertcleverphrasehere. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Dovadje, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

— InsertCleverPhraseHere (or here) 14:56, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Insertcleverphrasehere. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Dios injusto, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

— InsertCleverPhraseHere (or here) 14:57, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Power~enwiki. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Quetzal: match three, let the prizes come to me, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:25, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Kitson & Taormina

I've just come across your draft. Can't wait till you release it! I've been fiddling around with Taormina. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 11:47, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Thank you! Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:03, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Itamar Freed, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages BFA and MFA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ein Harod Art Museum

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Ein Harod Art Museum, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 16:41, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Boaz Arad

Hello, Arthistorian1977. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Boaz Arad".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 17:05, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Christo Geoghegan

Hello, Arthistorian1977. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Christo Geoghegan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 03:18, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Arthistorian1977, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
  • We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.

Technology update:

  • Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.

General project update:

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Dear, Arthistorian1977 (the article "Apirat Kongsompong")

Please do not delete the article, Apirat Kongsompong, since I had received the request from Gen.Apirat Kongsompong to write his short biography for him. As you know General Apirat is currently assistant commander in chief of the royal thai army and this article will be useful for anyone who may want to know about his background. I would like to apologize for trying to upload his picture so many times.

P.S.I have tried to upload "File:Apirat Kongsompong2.jpg" many times because this file is the most recent update picture of General Apirat Kongsompong, since I don't know how to upload it correctly. I wish you could understand what I am trying to do.

Regards, Martrakw (talk) 08:15, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Discussion

Hi. I saw you reviewed an article I wrote and thought you might want to weigh in on an AfD discussion we're having: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Michael_Hicks_(game_designer). Cheers. Indiestation (talk) 18:05, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Dear ArtHistorian1977 ,

Thanks for your kind mention about the reasons for my article not being published. As per your advice , I have now included a verifiable citation which is a newspaper article and have newly submitted the same article under 'Voiture électrique sans fils' but in French this time as the original news paper article is in French and the first demonstration of the invention was made in Nancy , France. The inventor john sanjay SWAMIDAS is my student and also a good friend of mine. His invention ' Wireless powered electric car ' is the first of it kind in the world and I am strongly convinced that it will certainly reolutionise electric vehicle technology. In case you need to get in touch with him , he can be reached on john.swamidas@gmail.com (For personal use only ). Thanks once again and have a good evening ! Marc Siebert Marc.siebert (talk) 19:28, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Category:Local Testimony Award Winners has been nominated for discussion

Category:Local Testimony Award Winners, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 06:17, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Cahk. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Summa Equity, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Cahk (talk) 07:16, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FLYROBE

it is a well known private company in India as like others Myntra, Jabong.com, Paytm etc. more than 1000000 people search to know about this origination worldwide I am wondering why the subject is not important enough to be included in an encyclopedia and i want more time to work on it, and for Arthistorian1977 Dear i respect your contribution on Wikipedia but before putting such speedily deleted request please do google or feel free to ask me if you are unable to find :) but don't ruin my "so called" hard-work i have been working on it since 20 oct 2017 and you just.......... and please please please :( have some respect about my Wikipedia contribution


if still you think you are right the you must request for speedily deleted for these pages too Myntra, Jabong.com, Paytm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sumitmpsd (talk • contribs) 09:46, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I have removed the CSD tag from the page above. The article clearly does make a claim of importance, and you should use AfD or PROD if you think it does not meet notability criteria. Please look at WP:A7 again. Thanks. Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 02:09, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

TimeFlip

Hello,

I was just wondering why you reviewed the article TimeFlip, which I marked for speedy deletion. There was unambiguous, and the text was copied word for word from a translated version of a website.

I would like some insight on this. Thank you. Hummerrocket (talk) 17:45, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello Hummerrocket , since the article is marked for speedy by you, which is perfectly proper, it does not need to stay in queue for reviews as a new article. Cheers Arthistorian1977 (talk) 19:36, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Atsme. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Pardon of Joe Arpaio, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Atsme📞📧 15:17, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Atsme, no offense, but unreviewing a page at AFD seems rather odd... Primefac (talk) 15:28, 16 November 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)
Hi Atsme, article with AFD should not stay in pool of articles for review. It has a discussion and the outcome is pretty binding. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 15:34, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Oh my! It was an accident, Primefac - I'm reviewing other articles using the curation tool - have too darn many tabs open - and I thought I closed the tool, got sidetracked to another article I was working on, and well, it was an accident. Literally, too many irons in the fire! My apologies. Thanks for fixing it. No, it should not have been unreviewed. Atsme📞📧 15:39, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
PS: the curation tool automatically sends that message (good thing it does). Atsme📞📧 15:40, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Justin Briner's page

Can you confirm that Justin Briner's page is good to go? It's been copied over from draft and you indicated it was "reviewed"AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:47, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Ugh, if it has been reviewed, that's one hell of a histmerge... Primefac (talk) 15:25, 19 November 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)
I've nominated the page for deletion. Primefac (talk) 17:11, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

The New Page Patroller's Barnstar

Thank you for checking on PRODS and BLP PRODS and reviewing them! Cheers. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 05:26, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

NPP question

Hi! I Just joined the NPP squad. Am I supposed to tick as reviewed articles I send off to CSD, PROD, or AfD? Following the flowchart in Wikipedia:New pages patrol it seemed to me that I'm only supposed to tick as reviewed if it passes review - but I saw you ticked off as reviewed some of those who I PRODed today - e.g. Mates condoms - was I supposed to tick this one as reviewed my self? (I could see how this would make sense - as it remains in the queue if unticked - but doesn't seem to match the tutorial).Icewhiz (talk) 14:46, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi Icewhiz. There is no clear established policy, but tradition. If you mark an article as AfD, you definitely can tick it as reviewed. If it's CSD and PROD you can do it, but follow the article in case author removes tag without any change and improvement. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:55, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Thanks! I'll follow that - it makes sense. Might make sense to update the NPP tutorial to reflect this understanding (I was definitely confused). I do of course watchlist any PRODs.Icewhiz (talk) 14:58, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hi Dear there please do not delete the article Important artist and sources of Azerbaijan are very important I spent a lot of trouble for that article. please do not delete please I will make the article more extensive — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayselonline (talk • contribs) 09:48, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Arthistorian1977/Archive_3&oldid=1140403165"