User talk:ArthurDent006.5

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, ArthurDent006.5. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 10:17, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Twoomail.com

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Twoomail.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Ruby Murray 15:01, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, ArthurDent006.5. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by PrimeHunter (talk) 03:57, 16 December 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Approximately every edit that I've ever done has been reverted.

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

how do I protest the reversion of factually correct changes for no obviously good reason?

ArthurDent006.5, it would be very helpful if you could provide some specific examples. I've looked over your last few edits and the reversions were mainly matters of policy (such as not putting templates in headers) or using templates instead of starting a talk page discussion. Again, specific examples will allow us to help you further. If you feel like you are being targeted and/or hounded, you can always bring it before WP:ANI, but again you will need specific examples. Primefac (talk) 21:23, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]