User talk:Artificial-Info22

This is Artificial-Info22's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Eternium Element (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 78.26 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Eternium Element and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 00:04, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artificial-Info22! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 00:04, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Gecko's has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gecko's. Thanks! —C.Fred (talk) 01:19, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Coral Reef's (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by C.Fred was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Coral reef instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Coral Reef's and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—C.Fred (talk) 01:20, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gecko's (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by C.Fred was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Gecko instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gecko's and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—C.Fred (talk) 01:20, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The Eternium Element

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:The Eternium Element, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:44, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia. If you are interested to know how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements already in Wikipedia – and, if possible, correct them. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with sanctions, which could include a block from editing. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:07, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Artificial-Info22, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:07, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond at ANI: there is an incident report there involving you

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Artificial-Info22 using AI to produce articles regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 03:08, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Coral Reef's has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Coral Reef's. Thanks! –Novem Linguae (talk) 17:50, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Gecko's has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gecko's. Thanks! –Novem Linguae (talk) 17:51, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 03:20, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Gecko's

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Gecko's, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –dlthewave ☎ 17:12, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Coral Reef's

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Coral Reef's, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –dlthewave ☎ 17:15, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]