User talk:Artist at Work

Image copyright problem with Image:The old smitht.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:The old smitht.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:04, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:The Eagle,Bispham.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:The Eagle,Bispham.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:08, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Bispham Green

I have had to revert your edit on the above article as the format for refrences is as it was previously, whereby the source goes "inline" in the article and then automatically appears in the References section. There is no need to move the "ref" to the references section, it should stay inline within the article. Thank you. ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 17:38, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. When posting messages to users, such as ♦Tangerines♦·Talk above, please ensure you put them into the user's talk page. I have removed your uncivil remarks posted to his user page - and because you could not observe politeness, I did not move it to the correct place. Thank you. Ref ^(chew)(do) 20:22, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Further to your message, I am aware of where Bispham Green is, and as I pointed out I was assuming good faith with your edit. However, it was incorrectly formatted, you removed the "reflist" for no reason and placed the source in the wrong place.♦Tangerines♦·Talk 20:46, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Image:Eagle in bispham.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Eagle in bispham.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Eagle in bispham.jpg is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Eagle in bispham.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 00:40, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]