User talk:Artour2006

Respiration

I suggest that anything you have to say about breathing is best added to the breathing article. The mind boggles at why you did edits to File:Example title.png. You are allowed to have pages to draft stuff but their names should begin with User:Artour2006/ — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 03:58, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. I thought that File:Example title.png was given to me to write a scrap file for my future use. Sorry. Artour2006 (talk) 21:28, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Noted. Any comments on this edit - see comment on talk page. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 00:39, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello Artour,

I just wanted to let you know that you don't need to end a summary for an edit with ~~~~, since it doesn't really do anything. You really only need to place it after a comment you make in a talk page like this one, where the four tildes are converted into your signature. Eugeniu B +1 05:58, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

ru:Метод Бутейко

I have translated (some parts of) the article on Buteyko method into Russian. Probably you would be interested to look. As the English article concerns only with asthma discussion, the current Russian text does the same. In the discussion at the talk page, you mentioned that "Russian MDs had medical trails with heart patients, liver cirhosis, radiation disease, etc." Is it worth to describe and do reliable references exist? — Ace111 (talk) 20:28, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Hyperventilation syndrome

A discussion about this page and Buteyko method, and your edits to them, is ongoing at WPMED. Neurotip (talk) 19:40, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Conflict of interest

As you have declared you run a website, and make a living, from the Buteyko method, it would be wise for you to review carefully our policy on conflict of interest, which would apply to any edits you make to the Buteyko method page as well as subjects related to Buteyko including hyperventilation and hyperventilation syndrome. Yobol (talk) 16:23, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Well, my dear friend, you removed the whole Table not just the website address, which is where the Table is taken from. So, now you are inventing an excuse for removal of the Table. As about conflict of interests, Wiki policy is: "In any case, citations should be in the third person and should not place undue emphasis on your work, giving proper due to the work of others, as in a review article." Furthermore, my User page clearly states where I am coming from. (Artour2006 (talk) 10:02, 24 January 2011 (UTC)).

References

Medical articles on Wikipedia must be cited by the best available evidence and written in a consistent format. A list of resources to help edit such articles can be found here. Additionally, the diberri tool will aid in the formatting of references; all one needs to do is cut and paste the results. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Cheers. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:16, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

It seems you have got this feedback before

The table is flawed concept - it is a collection of primary sources synthesised to make for a whole condition (i.e. WP:SYNTHESIS). Hyperventillation syndrome as such does not occur for example as a routine in COPD - they tend to get raised CO2 due to their damaged lungs, and whilst they might breath faster as a result of poor lung function (hyperventillation not being same as hyperventillation syndrome which is an unnecessary need to breath as excessively), their primary problem is not of hyperventillation and they do not end up with abnormally low CO2 levels. As per Talk:Hyperventilation syndrome, I've deleted this per WP:NOR as I did at Hyperventilation syndrome - please cite a WP:MEDRS 2nd source for such a collection. David Ruben ^Talk 19:07, 25 April 2010 (UTC) [1]

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:39, 24 January 2011 (UTC)