User talk:Arvindwankhede

Concern regarding Draft:Pelva Naik[edit]

Hello, Arvindwankhede. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pelva Naik, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pelva Naik[edit]

Hello, Arvindwankhede. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pelva Naik".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:47, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pelva Naik (December 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Aviram7 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Do not use wikipedia as reference, please see WP:CIRC and youtube, imdb are not a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pelva Naik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 16:00, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arvindwankhede! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 16:00, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Arvindwankhede. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 16:21, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pelva Naik (December 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No reliable sources, no secondary sources, IMDB still listed, promotional writing, no inline citations...I could go on.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pelva Naik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drmies (talk) 16:37, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am unable to edit the reference source to remove previous links.

I have added 2 new link from reliable sources.

Please let me know about what has to be done to publish the page successully on wikipedia as this is my first draft and let me know specifically what source or information is required or needs to be changed or removed in which section of the article as im facing difficulties in understanding the help pages.

Request you to Please do the needful and oblige.

Thanking You.

Respectfully Your's,

Arvind Arvindwankhede (talk) 17:10, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am unable to remove imdb and other references as there is no option to change it on able to add new ones and added 2 new references. I hope they are ok Arvindwankhede (talk) 17:12, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am unable to remove imdb and other references as there is no option to change it on able to add new ones and added 2 new references. I hope they are ok Arvindwankhede (talk) 17:13, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you are saying. I just removed it. The point is you need to add reliable sources, secondary sources. I see you added this, and those might work, but not if you just dump them into the article without indicating what they're supposed to verify. Please see WP:CITE. Submitting something that you know is not sufficiently verified, or properly formatted, or contains promotional/non-neutral language is just not a good idea. Encyclopedic articles should not feature writing like this, "Singing has been bringing a deep sense of happiness to Naik since she was a little girl." Please look at other, decent articles to see what an encyclopedic article looks like. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 18:48, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]