User talk:Asda59
January 2012[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Nandamuri Balakrishna, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 04:21, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
What part of "back door negotiations between the accused and the witnesses are said to have been the reason for the witnesses to turn hostile." was sourced to reliable sources? And "What is your problem" is not the way to open meaningful discussions. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 05:08, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- Due to the lack of sourcing I didn't trust the rest of the edit. If you want to restore the sourced section I won't object. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 05:19, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. First of all do not make personal attacks and comment on the "content" and not on the "contributer" as U did at The Mark of the Beast`s talk page. behave politely, calmly and reasonably. better go through the Five Pillars of Wikipedia
Secondly abt the article Nandamuri Balakrishna, the section Controversy was removed by an Unknown ip user, which i restored it with this edit, removing the section Shooting Case. if u feel some points are still missing. please feel free to include them with Sources.
Finally, take a look at the Welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. && Happy Editing !!!
- Regards, DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 11:31, 25 January 2012 (UTC).
Your copying of multiple sentences of the opinion piece by Palagummi Sainath into N. Chandrababu Naidu is a copyright violation. Placing them within quotations does not circumvent the copyright issue. Please do not re-add in the copyrighted material. A reference to the opinion piece is already listed in the section and copying of content from it are not necessary to expand upon the paragraph in question. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:12, 18 March 2012 (UTC)