User talk:Asherbin
Welcome[edit]
|
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Boaz huss.jpg[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Boaz huss.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ronhjones (Talk) 21:13, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Copyright problem: Cukier Goldstein-Goren Foundation[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Cukier Goldstein-Goren Foundation, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without verification of license. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.goldstein-goren.org/BeerSheva.html http://www.goldstein-goren.org/Milan.html http://www.goldstein-goren.org/Bucharest.html http://www.goldstein-goren.org/NewYork.html http://www.goldstein-goren.org/TLV.html, and http://www.goldstein-goren.org/ and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text will have to be deleted unless we are able to verify license. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Cukier Goldstein-Goren Foundation and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Cukier Goldstein-Goren Foundation, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Cukier Goldstein-Goren Foundation with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Cukier Goldstein-Goren Foundation. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Cukier Goldstein-Goren Foundation saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:41, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Status and Advice[edit]
Not seeing any such evidence, I deleted the article. I have no real doubt that the subject is notable, and a suitable article can be written. But a Wikipedia article needs to be written like an encyclopedia article, not a press release or web page. Remember not to copy from a web site, even your own -- first it's a copyright violation, but, even if you own the copyright and are willing to give us permission according to WP:DCM, the tone will not be encyclopedic and the material will not be suitable. As this was not: it was a listing of programs and events, and your web page is the place for that. What would be helpful is a list of notable faculty and graduates, which we define as anyone who already has a Wikipedia article.
In addition, a Wikipedia article needs to show notability with references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases.
Include only material that would be of interest to a general reader coming across the mention of the subject and wanting the sort of information that would be found in an encyclopedia. Do not include material that would be of interest only to those associated with the subject, or to prospective students--that sort of content is considered promotional.
As a general rule, a suitable page will be best written by someone without Conflict of Interest; it's not impossible to do it properly with a conflict of interest or as a paid press agent, but it's relatively more difficult: you are automatically thinking in terms of what the subject wishes to communicate to the public, but an uninvolved person will think in terms of what the public might wish to know. And keep in mind that the goal of an encyclopedia is to say things in a concise manner, which is not the style of press releases or web sites, which are usually more expansive.
If you think you can do it right according to our guidelines, do so, but expect the article to be carefully checked for objectivity.
The article Boaz Huss has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- currently fails all registers of WP:SCHOLAR notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. czar ♔ 03:56, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boaz Huss is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boaz Huss until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. czar ♔ 16:26, 18 December 2013 (UTC)