User talk:Ashish57

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Ashish57! Thank you for your contributions. I am MJ94 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! MJ94 (talk) 04:05, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shivaji, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raigad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you plan an overall Maratha cleanup?

Greetings, I see you've been working on a lot of Maratha articles; are you considering an overall cleanup of the Maratha topics? The Maratha clans articles have been generally written and expanded by User:Starrahul, and I've been hassling him for three years now about his constant poor copyediting, bad punctuation, flowery POV language, etc. He's at least doing proper footnotes now, so that's improved, but you'll note that dozens of Maratha clan articles have no footnotes and an identical list of claimed "sources" that looks suspiciously like no sourcing at all.

If you're looking to go and make some big improvements to the Maratha clan articles, I have some suggestions, so let me know if you'd like to brainstorm some cleanup. MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:46, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bicholim conflict for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bicholim conflict is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bicholim conflict until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.--ShelfSkewed Talk 16:56, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]