User talk:AshishMishra1410

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, AshishMishra1410. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 16:40, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HickoryOughtShirt?4 thank you for alerting me to this. I read the guidelines on disclosing conflict of interest earlier today and was researching how to do it. It seemed a little intimidating so I decided to get back to it later. I will do it now and also keep the other guidelines on managing conflict in interest in mind. Thank you. AshishMishra1410 (talk) 16:56, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply! I know it can be intimidating so maybe the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide would be an easier read. Feel free to reach out to me or the WP:Teahouse if you have any questions! HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 00:01, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Morning Context (July 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Morning Context and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Morning Context, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 08:50, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AshishMishra1410! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 331dot (talk) 08:50, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Morning Context (September 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DaxServer was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Morning Context and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— DaxServer (t · m · c) 13:47, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw the submission got rejected. I wanted to add two more references to the submission but could not. A. https://techcrunch.com/2022/09/07/byjus-blackstone-oxshott-sumeru-ipo-financial-audit-morgan-stanley/ and B. https://techcrunch.com/2022/08/21/new-media-venture-in-india-helping-readers-discern-signal-from-noise/. TechCrunch is an independent source plus I went through how Wikipedia wants to include more independent journalism/media companies so I think the submission should be considered again. Thanks. AshishMishra1410 (talk) 14:01, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Morning Context[edit]

Hello, AshishMishra1410. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Morning Context, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Morning Context[edit]

Hello, AshishMishra1410. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Morning Context".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:38, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]