User talk:Ashishvats23

WP:BADCHARTS

Please do not add the Bulgarian Singles Chart, the Portugal Top 50, the Italian chart from acharts.us, or any other chart listed at WP:BADCHARTS to any Wikipedia articles. Thank you.—Kww(talk) 14:08, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

/Practice

Shakira discography

Hello, I want to thank you for your contributions to the article Shakira discography, but any changes to drastic that makes a big difference in the format, as the singles table, could and should be discussed at the talk page. --Dan6hell66 (talk) 21:18, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shakira "She Wolf"

Why did you vandalise the page and remove the UK? Jayy008 (talk) 14:49, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my mistake, I apologize, I will revert my edit! Jayy008 (talk) 16:18, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Ricky_martin.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ricky_martin.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 05:16, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Historia 408x334 2003 01.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Historia 408x334 2003 01.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:40, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Socks of banned users

I see that Beafriend has been trying to persuade you to made edits on his behalf. Please read WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Brexx and WP:BAN before you do.—Kww(talk) 16:22, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

user: alxknight

the difrence between me and that person, is that that person from day one was arguing, about santa claus lane, i just came to that argument a couple of days ago, also the diffrence is that, unlike the user, i created a sandbox, and have been careful with my edits, and have talk in the discussion, administardors when i created by second user, told me the problem for i have been here at wikipedia for a long time ago with a diffrence user which is no longer active, (for i have lost password, ect.) alkknight was created after weeks (maybe less than a month) after my old user name (again, months ago) why accusation has nothing to do with that user, admistators and i emailed eachother with this issues, after days they emailed me back saying theire wasn't no problem, for teh IP is register to my school, (libary) with no problem, pls talk to me about the accusations before having any issues, again unlike eddoep803 i have been for respectful with my edits, one more thing eddiep803, and ismael, are unactive, i am! how will i be connected to socked??? pls let me know what other problems are accurinng??? i am willing to help work this out:)Alxknight (talk) 22:24, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

if you guys want to "watch me" and see connections pls feel free to do so, i have nothing to hide, (but am mortified with these accusations) but blocking me, or deleting me with no consent isint fair, for i have not made anything prohibted by wikipedia, pls feel free to talk to me so we can fix this issue, i am willing to help:) again thanx:)Alxknight (talk) 22:24, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New billboard chart policy

As per consensus at WP:record charts there is a new guide to using Billboard Charts available at Billboard charts guide. Mainstream Top 40 (Pop Songs) (formerly known just as Pop Songs) is no longer deemed a component chart - there is no evidence to support this motion.Lil-unique1 (talk) 19:38, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We didnt have any proof in the first place. There was lots of people discussion all the changes to charts and i explicitly stated that no proof could be found supporting the claims that it is a component chart as it has the same status as Adult Cotemporary Songs. In the way that AC Songs is measured by the spins on AC radio, Mainstream Top 40 (Pop Songs) measures spins on Pop Radio. As everyone agreed it was implemented into policy and deemed acceptable for use as shown at WP:USCHARTS. if you feel otherwise i'm happy to open discussion of it at WP:USCHARTS but there certainly is no reason to remove it at the moment. Lil-unique1 (talk) 02:43, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Listen Up! The Official 2010 FIFA World Cup Album

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Listen Up! The Official 2010 FIFA World Cup Album, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.worldcupwatcher.com/listen-up-world-cup-album. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:45, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bad charts (apparently again)

per WP:BADCHARTS the website Charly1300.com is not allowed, please, do not add it. Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 02:30, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism

Do not plagiarize, as you did here. See Wikipedia:Plagiarism for further information. rʨanaɢ (talk) 14:38, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Waka Waka (This Time for Africa). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please do not use that Spoof headlines site for citations again. --moreno oso (talk) 04:47, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shakira cavalli.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shakira cavalli.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:27, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Waka Waka (This Time for Africa). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. I don't know why you think that the song has reached #3 on the Latin Songs chart, but the reference cited says it's at 12. Please provide other source citations (or stop changing the number). Thanks. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 17:48, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Waka Waka (This Time for Africa). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 17:25, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Christina.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Christina.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — ξ ^xplicit 04:42, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason why you put 2010 as the recording year for Christina Aguilera's You Lost Me single? It has been in album's article she worked with the producers in January 2009, not 2010.Carmaker1 (talk) 04:11, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shakira at american idol.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shakira at american idol.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:36, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shakira waka waka.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shakira waka waka.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:08, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of MP3 Music Awards for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article MP3 Music Awards, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MP3 Music Awards until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 04:22, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shakira cavalli.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shakira cavalli.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:33, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cricket World Cup song: De Ghumaa Ke

Hi Ashishvats23, could you please improve this page: De Ghumaa Ke, the page for the official song of 2011 Cricket World Cup composed by Shankar-Ehsaan-Loy. It would be very helpful. Thanking you--Karyasuman (talk) 09:50, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shakira dizzee.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shakira dizzee.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:11, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gaga's sales

Hi, There are two newspapers from Uk claming she sold 22 million album. I think they are using Graham Norton as a source because those sales are inflated. Billboard said this week tha The Fame sold 12 million WW, it is impossible total sales are 22 million because TFM EP sold less than 2 million in US, Japan and canada. I think sales now are a bit over 15 million but 22 is impossible. The MTV source said she sold 13 million in August 2010, it is impossible she sold 9 million since then.--Albes29 (talk) 08:15, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Christina.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Christina.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 02:03, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For your fine contributions to List of awards and nominations received by Lady Gaga and keeping it upto-date always. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 15:10, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you deserve it, do you speak Hindi? :) — Legolas ^(talk2me) 15:36, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nice, main bhi. Hum dono same desh se hain. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 15:41, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Main Calcutta se hu. I have visited only CR park of Delhi. Anyways, keep up the good work, very soon I will develop the awards list for WP:FL. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 15:47, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You post at UKmix as ashish? — Legolas ^(talk2me) 15:05, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shakira : Live at Glastonbury

The article Shakira : Live at Glastonbury has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Part of a festival, not a tour

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Status {^talk_contribs 07:17, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shakira - Give it up to me.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shakira - Give it up to me.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Beerest355 Talk 02:05, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shakira-waka-video.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shakira-waka-video.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:01, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shakira at final world cup.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shakira at final world cup.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 12:31, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Christina You lost me Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Christina You lost me Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ashishvats23. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ashishvats23. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shakirasinglewc.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shakirasinglewc.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]