User talk:Asiciogludeniz

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oege-Sietse van Lingen (January 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oege-Sietse van Lingen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:42, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Asiciogludeniz! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:42, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Paid editing

Hello Asiciogludeniz. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Asiciogludeniz. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Asiciogludeniz|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 13:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

@Theroadislong Hello. Thank you for the explanation. I am actually not interested in getting paid for these articles.I am a freelancer on Upwork and I needed to do some one-time projects for my profile. Then I came across Wikipedia article writing, and after doing research and studying how to create a draft, I decided to give it a go. I am completely unbiased and have no intention of advertising anyone's business. I also informed my clients that the content should be written from a neutral point of view and must have valid references from reliable sources, etc. I would like to improve myself and be a paid Wikipedia editor in the future, though. However, I can also understand that paid editing is not encouraged by Wikipedia, and I respect that. I will update my talk page and the articles' pages as described. I want to comply with all the policies of Wikipedia; I have no problem with that at all but my lack of experience in paid editing led to this situation. Since I am working through Upwork ( Freelancer Platform), should I mention the employer as Upwork and client as my client from Upwork ? Please let me know. Thank you in advance. Asiciogludeniz (talk) 15:20, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Yes absolutely you should mention it and be advised that your edits as a potential paid editor will be closely scrutinised by reviewers. Paid editing is allowed but VERY much discouraged. Theroadislong (talk) 15:32, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

@Theroadislong Hello again. I have made the changes and updated my user page and the talk pages of both articles. I hope everything is according to policy now. I even added the job links from Upwork so that everything was legitimate. Please let me know if further information is needed. Thanks for your help.

If I am constantly going to have problems with payment disclosures and relevance issues, I prefer not to be a paid editor in the future because I do not have the time to check the comments regularly. I just want to finish the contracts that I have and be done with creating drafts in return for payment. I might consider becoming a volunteer writer as I do enjoy writing in general. Asiciogludeniz (talk) 00:47, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Oege-Sietse van Lingen has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Oege-Sietse van Lingen. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:13, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oege-Sietse van Lingen (February 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oege-Sietse van Lingen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:13, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Paid editing again

Please disclose whether you are being paid to edit Draft:Oege-Sietse van Lingen. Theroadislong (talk) 17:17, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

I don't understand what you mean. I already disclosed in the Draft's talk page that I am being paid and also stated this in my User page as you previously described. I used the template {{paid|user=Asiciogludeniz|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}} . Do I also need to make a statement in my talk page ? Asiciogludeniz (talk) 18:29, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

I changed the employer's name to Oege-Sietse van Lingen, it was previously the job employer on Upwork. I can also remove the Hat-trick reference from Wikipedia anytime but I do not want to resubmit before you approve. Please let me know. Payment is disclosed on both talk page of the draft and on my user page. Asiciogludeniz (talk) 18:55, 12 February 2024 (UTC)