User talk:Asikorsky

This user is a student editor in Georgia_Institute_of_Technology/Writing_Women_Back_into_Tech_History_(Summer_2019) .

Welcome!

Hello, Asikorsky, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:27, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anne-Marie Staub Peer Review

Anne-Marie Staub Peer Review

The lead seems to cover the most important parts(work in antihistamines and salmonella). This does seem to give a good overview of why she is important(having not read the article). Having read the article the only mentions of salmonella are in the lead and the info box. Either mentions of work on Salmonella should be removed from the lead or the article should address her work on Salmonella.

The order of the sections in the article seem appropriate. The awards section is after the biography which seems to follow wikipedia conventions and is chronological.

The article seems to be neutral. The article does not give appropriate weight to her work with Salmonella. The article does not try and draw conclusions or attempt to convince the reader.

The article is neutral on all topics. The author does not seem to have any perspective. The entire article only lists Anne-Marie Staub accomplishments. From this article I would assume she had no scandals and no controversies. That may be correct I do not know enough about Staub to know if that is the case. It probably isn't necessary to state she has no controversies if that is the case.

The most important parts of the biography section contain links to relevant and reliable information. Claims about her early childhood and awards are mostly uncited.

JadenMcElvey (talk) 18:04, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anne-Marie Staub has been accepted

Anne-Marie Staub, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 13:22, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]