Jump to content

User talk:Asolanki1915

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 2023

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 10:25, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. [1] MrOllie (talk) 12:39, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do verification of links which i added. Asolanki1915 (talk) 12:48, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I did. You're spamming. Keep it up and you can expect your account will be blocked and/or the spammed domain will be added to Wikipedia's blacklist. MrOllie (talk) 13:01, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Warfarin. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. MrOllie (talk) 17:03, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Codal (December 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NoobThreePointOh was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
NoobThreePointOh (talk) 11:57, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Asolanki1915! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! NoobThreePointOh (talk) 11:57, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]
As it has become apparent that your account will be used solely for unconstructive editing, you have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} to this page.

Sam Kuru (talk) 12:33, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As per the warnings above - the continued use of junk spam blogs is not acceptable. Sam Kuru (talk) 12:33, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please tell me why those blogs are spam? Asolanki1915 (talk) 12:37, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can't tell if you're kidding. "Folotop" is hot SEO garbage; poorly written by two Mumbai marketers with random spam images, likely mostly LLM generated. "imitationhub.com" is the same, only with completely AI generated material and no bylines. Now that I'm poking around, I can see that you've spammed these on other wikis as well; probably best to blacklist them. Sam Kuru (talk) 16:45, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]