User talk:Assem Khidhr/Archives/2021/December

Orlando Figes

Please see my comments on the last edit, and on the previous revert to the edit by Karl Krafft, who is clearly hostile, possibly malicious, for why else would he create a whole new section, misleadingly entitled "Reception..." and include only criticisms from critics well-known for their hostility to Figes? In line with Wikipedia rules on balance and with the rules of academic discourse, the section needs to include Figes' responses to his critics, which are published, and perhaps some more impartial, perhaps even positive, assessments of his work. Thanks for reading, John Stapleton, London — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:8E80:FC00:A56B:34DE:A922:3FA9 (talk) 16:13, 23 December 2021 (UTC)