User talk:Assiaksgian1

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Assiaksgian1, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 14:47, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Content requires sources[edit]

I keep removing the unsourced claims of awards because content particularly content about living persons requires reliably published sources. The fact that other articles have not yet been brought up to appropriate levels of sources is NOT a reason for having inappropriate content in yet another article. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 14:47, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But why do you see the resources as unreliable?I watched for example the award shows and if you want i can post them here, so it is reliable.. further every indian news page posts about it

February 2014[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|It's true that I had the AssiaKSGian account before but I have forgotten my password and was also not logged in and therefore I made a new account.And furthermore I didn't add any abusive or illegitimate edits, so why am I blocked? I find this kinda confusing.And I would even delete my previous account but since I don't remember my password I can't. Please unblock me, it's a humble request. ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. DMacks (talk) 15:15, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Assiaksgian1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It's true that I had the AssiaKSGian account before but I have forgotten my password and was also not logged in and therefore I made a new account.And furthermore I didn't add any abusive or illegitimate edits, so why am I blocked? I find this kinda confusing.And I would even delete my previous account but since I don't remember my password I can't. Please unblock me, it's a humble request. Daniel Case (talk) 01:19, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Accept reason:

I unblocked this one and blocked the other one instead ("keep the account claimed to be the current/active one"). DMacks (talk) 04:24, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia[edit]

As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia provides a plot SUMMARY not a recreation of every plot twist. The existing summary already exceeds the recommended length. Do not add plot details without first removing or condensing less important content. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:21, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It doesnt matter how long the story is, any story can be summarized in a single sentence.

As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia and its readers to not need every detail. A summary of 500-700 words is more than enough to capture what is worthy of noting about the plot.

If you want to actually improve the article, you should focus on finding third party reliable sources that discuss important things about the show other than its plot and build the article that way. If you are merely interested in regurgitating every plot twist, you are better off building your own fan page where you are perfectly free to build your fansite with whatever content you want. But at Wikipedia you will need to focus on building encyclopedic content.

See our guidance on writing about fiction. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:59, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]