User talk:Asteam Techno Solutions

This is Asteam Techno Solutions's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Asteam Techno Solutions/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Asteam Techno Solutions! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Asteam Techno Solutions/sandbox[edit]

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Asteam Techno Solutions/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:53, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Cabayi (talk) 10:13, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

please unblock and change my username[edit]

{{unblock|reason= Changing username : Asteam Techno } Asteam Techno Solutions (talk) 10:21, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) You must format your unblock request correctly for it to show up on the administrators' feed, otherwise no one may see it.

In any case, I can tell you already that your proposed name is no more acceptable than your current one, so you need to rethink that before making the request. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:27, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

please unblock my userename and change my username : Asteam

thank you ! Asteam Techno Solutions (talk) 10:35, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hello

please change my username and unblock my account !

{unblock|reason=Change username "Drashti90" ~~~~} Asteam Techno Solutions (talk) 04:39, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The username you have selected is acceptable but you have not addressed any of the 4 bullet points in your block notice. Enclosing your appeal in code & nowiki tags will prevent it from working. Your appeal needs to be in the format

{{unblock-spamun|Drashti90|Your reason here  ~~~~}}

Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. If you do it right your appeal will appear neatly presented in a box and you'll know you've got it right. You need to convince the reviewing administrator that you are here to contribute to the project, not just to advertise your business. Since I blocked you I will not be the admin to consider your appeal. Cabayi (talk) 10:09, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i m ready with condition @Cabayi please change my username | unblock my account Asteam Techno Solutions (talk) 12:08, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you ! Asteam Techno Solutions (talk) 12:08, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh. I must say that your inability and/or unwillingness to follow clear and simple instructions does not exactly inspire confidence. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:28, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing At that time I was unaware of following the instructions but from now on I will follow all instructions so please unblock my account. Asteam Techno Solutions (talk) 04:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i will care about following the instructions , please unblock my account ,Thank you ! i am waiting your reply. Asteam Techno Solutions (talk) 09:11, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You say "from now on I will follow all instructions", yet you're not even following Cabayi's clear instructions for how to appeal your block. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:12, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing can you share again for which instructions i don't follow from @Cabayi.sorry for that .Asteam Techno Solutions (talk) 10:22, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock - spamun | Drashti90 | change my username and I will follow all instructions from now .Asteam Techno Solutions (talk) 10:29, 4 June 2024 (UTC)}}[reply]

Oh, good grief! Don't wrap the template inside

</code>, it causes the template to not operate. You've been told this already. :::::::::::Cabayi has posted in this section precisely once, with instructions on how to format your block appeal, and what you must address when appealing. Read and understand that, then action as instructed. Otherwise administrators will not see your request. :::::::::::You're not expected to be some ninja-level Wikipedia black belt, but some degree of [[WP:competence is required|competence is required]] to function on this site. :::::::::::And you don't need to keep pinging Cabayi; they are no doubt busy with other things, and already told you they wouldn't be the one reviewing your appeal in any case. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 10:35, 4 June 2024 (UTC) ::::::::::::<nowiki>{{unblock - spamun | Drashti90 | unblocked }}Asteam Techno Solutions (talk) 11:36, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock - spamun | Drashti90 | unblocked }}Asteam Techno Solutions (talk) 11:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Enough[edit]

I think we've had enough of this. I formally refuse any unblock request - the discussions above provide ample reason - and I have revoked talk page access. —Small jim 11:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]