User talk:Asugff

This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of Hytioplion (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to contributions for evidence.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

December 2007[edit]

Film noir[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Film noir. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Giles Bennett ^{(Talk, Contribs)} 18:25, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article is about Film Noir. The image is an example from the genre illustrating the nature of films noir. How on earth does it constitute an advert for the film? Giles Bennett ^{(Talk, Contribs)} 18:26, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Try reading John_Alton. Giles Bennett ^{(Talk, Contribs)} 18:29, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to assume good faith. Not every sentence needs an independent citation to support it. The fact that he photographed many of the most famous film noirs is justified by the subsequent list of films with which he was involved. Giles Bennett ^{(Talk, Contribs)} 18:34, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

"Asugff," you are obviously Hytioplion. If you continue to make disruptive edits on film noir you will be blocked for both bad-faith editing and for sockpuppetry. Your continued misbehavior will not lead to any change in the article; it will lead only to you being blocked again.—DCGeist (talk) 18:32, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your message.[edit]

Dicussion of article content and editing should take place on the article's talk page. Please make your case for deletion there, and not on my talk page. Thank you. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 18:41, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning regarding your edit to Film noir‎[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 18:39, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Film noir, you will be blocked from editing. Giles Bennett ^{(Talk, Contribs)} 18:42, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In light of your contributions under this, and another, username, yes, your edit is disruptive in my view. Giles Bennett ^{(Talk, Contribs)} 18:47, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Placing unnecessary tags where no citation is needed does constitute vandalism. Giles Bennett ^{(Talk, Contribs)} 18:51, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Civil[edit]

I suggest you read it. You might also like to have a look at WP:Sock puppet while you're in the area. Giles Bennett ^{(Talk, Contribs)} 18:50, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hour in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule . Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Caknuck (talk) 19:06, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]