Jump to content

User talk:Atenea26

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Com signar en altres wikis

[edit]

Hi!

Ets tu qui ha deixat una opinió a ca:Discussió:Cristòfor Colom i no conseguia signar com a User:Atenea26 la fòrmula és esta: [[:en:User:Atenea26|]], automàticament el programari afegirà el Atenea26 entre | i ]].

Si Gracies, una altra pregunta no me puc logejar a la viquipèdia amb el meu usuari del mirror anglés?Atenea26 11:05, 16 may 2006 (UTC)

If you don't undestand that is able that a User is taking your identity on ca:Discussió:Cristòfor Colom.

Pasqual (ca) · discussió * 22:38, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful about removing things

[edit]

Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. RexNL 17:34, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Web browser categorization.

[edit]

Hi — I'm going to roll back your changes to the categorization of Web browser so that it is in Category:Web browsers again. I think that is the best place for it. Usually an article is not placed in both a subcategory and its category such as Category:Network-related software and Category:software. JonHarder 12:53, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your contribution on builder pharaoh (Hatseput)

[edit]

You are quite right — and I am planning on adding my sources. I added the new material late last evening and wanted to check it in before I went to bed, so I didn't cite my source at the time.

My plan is to expand that article further, drawing upon articles in a couple of issues of KMT (http://www.egyptology.com/kmt/) (Fall 2005 and the most recent issue) and from Shaw's book on the history of ancient Egypt. Any objections to me expanding the burial section into something separate, and also going into the disputes about which mummy may be her's? Captmondo 16:41, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit on Vandalism

[edit]

I am soliciting responses to my addition of "nonsense" to WP:Vandalism. I saw you edited that part of the article recently. I would ask you to please offer your comments or insights on the WP:Vandalism discussion page. --Blue Tie 02:15, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Atenea26

[edit]

Hey there, Atenea26. Just dropped by to say hello. Hope you're okay. Dude Aronomy 03:37, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

=

Barnstar Mockery

[edit]

On May 7th of this year, at 14:37, the user page User:Dr Spam (MD) was created. Within a period of 48 hours, User:Dr Spam (MD) had placed approximately 55 barnstars on user pages and user talk pages. Many recipients doubted the sincerity of the sentiments behind these barnstars, in part because of the comments placed by Dr Spam on the barnstars. A sampling of the reasons that Dr. Spam offered for presenting barnstars to editors:

  • Hi - I am putting this here in case there's trouble later. Please accept this tireless barnstar thing for all of your wiki-activity. Thanks. User:Dr Spam (MD) 16:08, 11 May 2007

  • Hi I am leaving you with this barnstar for you to reflect carefully on. I will provide the citation in a few days once you have had the opportunity to consider why I might think that you deserve it. Peace User:Dr Spam (MD) 16:50, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Well done for all of your fantastic editing / writing: you are obviously a genius of our day, shining like the brightest barnstar against a dark barnnight in these new and difficult wiki-times. I therefore award you the surreal barnstar (I can't get the other barnstars to work properly - my apologies.) Please note that you have no right to remove the barnstar, for it is sacred. LEAVE WELL ALONE! Many thanks.

  • cool editing
  • Awesome
  • Cool.
  • I am awarding you a surreal barnstar because you obviously deserve it! Keep up the good work - don't slacken off, it'll get harder before it gets easier!
  • Hy my cat (the fat white one) is awarding you this barnstar of diligence because he doesn't eat fish either. He just likes to eat biscuits - or so he says. But how then does he get so fat????

Occasionally Dr. Spam's comments did appear sincere (if vague), but a review of the record indicates that sincere-appearing comments were generally generated during a massive cut-and-paste session. There were also many barnstars presented with no comments at all, and even more that User:Dr Spam (MD) presented without signing his name to indicate from whom the award was coming. And some barnstars, praising the editing skills of the recipient, were awarded to editors with one solitary edit to their name.

In response, once this pattern of apparent insincerity was established, a few experienced editors asked Dr. Spam to desist from barnstar spamming, in the belief that randomly awarding barnstars devalues the entire barnstar program. (Indeed, so random was the placement of barnstars, that some were even placed on wiki accounts that had not been active for over a year.) Dr. Spam has now stopped, presumably recognizing that his efforts were not appreciated by the majority of editors.

Most of the barnstars placed by Dr. Spam during his May campaign have been voluntarily removed by the editors on whose pages they were placed. You are receiving this notice because Dr. Spam's barnstar still remains on your page. If you feel that Dr. Spam's barnstar spamming was a form of mockery, you may choose to remove it yourself. But if the way this barnstar was "awarded" does not bother you, you are of course free to keep it on your page. After all, it is your page. This notification was simply for your information. HuskyHuskie 14:01, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Melt the clouds of sin and sadness, drive the dark of doubt away!

[edit]

Marlith T/C 04:59, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Marlith T/C has wished you well! Joy promotes WikiLove and hopefully this little bit has helped make your day better. Spread the WikiJoy by sharing the joy someone else, Try to brighten the day of as many people as you can! Keep up the great editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Joy message}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

any better now? Marlith T/C 02:24, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Just about every user category you're in has been nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:User categories for discussion. Cheers! bd2412 T 21:33, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:User Greek recon2

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:User Greek recon2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:06, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Athenea28, in response to your question,

  1. There were no deamons,
  2. «rosana y siaska» are most likely girlfriends of some pretender. For a reference of this, you are welcome to take a look at IP 201.248.21.206's contribution of decembre 17, 2006.
  3. I wasn't able to see anywhere in the artilcle a reference to rosacea, but if you still haven't been able to find what it is, you can check out the Wikipedia article in english for Rosacea, or several articles MedlinePlus has about the condition. Both articles have equivalents in spanish.

Stop by if you need anything else, Bobjgalindo (talk) 00:28, 5 April 2008 (UTC) (Rjgalindo)[reply]

About a message you sent me

[edit]

Sorry, I don't usually visit my talk page very often, so I missed your message.

About "You contibution in typhoid fever" that you wrote onto my talk page, I was wondering what did you mean by my contribution? I never edited Typhoid fever, so I don't understand this. Could you explain?

--Freiddie 13:38, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!