Jump to content

User talk:Athu1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thalapathy 63 (November 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiDan61 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:56, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Athu1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:56, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Vijay filmography has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Vijay filmography was changed by Athu1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.895459 on 2018-11-14T18:07:50+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:07, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thalapathy 63 (November 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 19:45, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Thalapathy-63-stills-photos-pictures-01.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Thalapathy-63-stills-photos-pictures-01.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 19:47, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Thalapathy-63-stills-photos-pictures-01.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Thalapathy-63-stills-photos-pictures-01.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thalapathy 63[edit]

Hey bro, sorry man I didn't see you made a draft article of Thalapathy 63 and in a hurry I made it as. A article so please forgive me. Anyway my article will be deleted though I'm feeling like I took other's article. Sorry and thank you. rupa$$$ (talk) 02:58, 14 December 2018 (UTC) No probs.[reply]

January 2019[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Petta (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diffs: [1] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:42, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb:, there is no way to identify what the character names are unless someone has watched the movie, which I did yesterday, which is why I edited the character names. Thanks, Athu1

Ah, at the time the article lead still indicated that the film was "upcoming". Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:16, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense. It released yesterday in the US.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thalapathy 63 (January 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Whispering(t) 20:22, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019[edit]

Information icon Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Draft: Thalapathy 63. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:48, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. I don't know what you are talking about. I have not made any edits since you said not to resubmit it before release. I don't know who has done this. -Athu1

June 2019[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Thalapathy 63, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:35, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Master (2020 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Darbar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Master (Ravichander album)[edit]

Master (Ravichander album), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

1292simon (talk) 10:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Filmographies[edit]

These edits are not constructive. We do not add films to filmographies until it can be proven that the film has begun shooting. This is standard practise and is further indicated at WP:FILMOGRAPHY, which says Do not add future projects until filming has begun as verified by a reliable source. That is because anything can derail a film's production, and if someone doesn't actually work on the project, then they don't get credit for working on the project. Additionally, please don't edit while logged out. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:34, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 19[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Suseenthiran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Angelina.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]