User talk:Atilladrjb
|
March 2007
[edit]Vandalism warning
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Rocky Gray, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --BlindEagletalk*contribs 20:51, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Will Boyd
[edit]Greetings. Why did you redirect William Boyd to Will Boyd? William is his proper name. I'm also wondering why you are reversing the order of Balsamo and LeCompt on several pages. Just curious as to your reasoning. -- Huntster T • @ • C 23:17, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Please stop changing the article name to Will Boyd. His accurate name is William Boyd, and the (musician) modifier helps set it apart. Please give a reason for this modification. Thanks. -- Huntster T • @ • C 07:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- You left a message on my talk page regarding your changes to William Boyd. I think you left this message for the wrong user. --BlindEagletalk*contribs 12:37, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
March 2007
[edit]Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to William Boyd (musician). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Indon (reply) — 10:54, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Delete warning
[edit]
Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Rocky Gray, you will be blocked from editing. — Indon (reply) — 12:02, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Regarding edits to William Boyd (musician)
[edit]Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Atilladrjb! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule img[0-9]*\.imageshack\.us/img[0-9]*/.*\.jpg, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 18:16, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
March 2007
[edit]Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages, such as Malt (Turkish band), to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. Wooyi 00:23, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:03319cj.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:03319cj.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:05, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
May 2007
[edit]Please stop. You are inserting images into the article John LeCompt that fail Wikipedia's fair use policy, specifically Unacceptable use criteria #8. Such non-free images cannot be used when it can reasonably be expected that a free image could be obtained. -- Huntster T • @ • C 14:38, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:John010.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:John010.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:09, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:2953268.jpg
[edit]
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:2953268.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:49, 3 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. HermesBot 19:49, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Francesco DiCosmo, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.dudejones.com/docs/fran.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 17:51, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Emre
[edit] Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Emre Belözoğlu. Information must be backed up independent and verifiable sources. The article reports that Fenerbahce have been given permission to talk to Emre, but until such time as the deal is done, the player is actually transferred and there are independent sources to verify that, he must stay listed as a Newcastle player. Please see WP:NOTCRYSTAL Thank you. DrFrench (talk) 18:54, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Galatasaray Squad
[edit]Ozbek and Erdem are both German. Yes they are of Turkish descent but that doesn't take away from the fact that they are German. Hubschrauber729 (talk) 00:25, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Richard Wright
[edit]I suspect you realize this has been discussed before, based on the edit summary on the Rick Wright redirect page. A major change like this needs to be discussed first. It has already been discussed in the past, and rejected. See the Pink Floyd talk page archives for details. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 15:04, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Instead of quietly making this change (meaning no talk page discussion, no explanation of what you are changing in the edit summary), you should try explaining your reasons for wanting this change on a talk page. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pink Floyd would be a good place, since you are considering changing multiple articles. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 18:38, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
February 2009
[edit] Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. The Real Libs-speak politely 18:34, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edit to the page Ten (Pearl Jam album) appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you may do and take a look at the welcome page, if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you.-5- (talk) 21:38, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Slash track "Watch This"
[edit]Ive noticed that you have on a few occasions changed the name of the track to "Watch This Dave", this is incorrect, on the Slash site its titled "Watch This" seen here [1] and can also be seen with the title on the following (reliable) links [2] [3] while Slash has also posted that as the title on HIS twitter here [4]. Some sites have posted the song with the wrong title, but I would think Slash would be the least likely to get it wrong eh?
Please refrain from changing it in future HrZ (talk) 17:06, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
That song's name is "Watch This Dave"
Did you see the original CD? Here are the pictures...
http://img52.imageshack.us/img52/5602/26788116853301661746100.jpg
http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/5242/26788116853418328401100.jpg
- Im afraid that doesnt back your argument up at all:
- Your own images cant be used as a reference though. And again, Slash himself called the track "Watch This" while Duff himself (who plays on the track) called it that also here [5]
- But I can see this is just going to keep going back and forward, and seeing as their are indeed albums with "Watch This Dave" (which would explain why sites have listed it as that also) the best solution would be to call it both, e.g. "Watch This/Watch This Dave" if BOTH of the tracks are correct, their is enough evidence to suggest they both are.
- Also, im reverting your edit of M. Shadows on the page, its really unnecessary seeing as how that his his stage name (therefore thats the way it should appear) and also how it is linked on other wiki pages. HrZ (talk) 10:32, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:38054310 suzuki200.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:38054310 suzuki200.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 23:32, 8 July 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:32, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)