User talk:Atlantic306/Archive 13

Please comment on Talk:Dana Loesch

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dana Loesch. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Alicia Keys

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alicia Keys. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Liberation (Christina Aguilera album)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Liberation (Christina Aguilera album). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Annette Lee

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Annette Lee. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Cameron Kasky

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cameron Kasky. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Joy-Ann Reid

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Joy-Ann Reid. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:D. H. Lawrence

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:D. H. Lawrence. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Music

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Music. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Record charts

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Record charts. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Tom Dixon (industrial designer)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tom Dixon (industrial designer). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Star Wars: The Last Jedi

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Star Wars: The Last Jedi. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Atlantic306/Archive 13. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Richard⁰⁶¹² 19:13, 18 May 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Please comment on Talk:Diamond and Silk

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Diamond and Silk. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Non-free use in drafts

Hi Atlantic306. Just for reference, non-free files are not allowed to be used in drafts per WP:NFCC#9 and WP:DRAFTS#Preparing drafts. This edit does not mean the image complies with WP:NFCC#7, so the file is still orphaned non-free use per WP:F5. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:42, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

• • Thanks for the info Atlantic306 (talk) 10:09, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

NPP edits

I've reverted your edits to WP:NPP, because they changed the meaning of the paragraph that was only supposed to be about A1/A3. I did want to comment on this edit summary, though, which is just wrong. G12 in particular should not be given anytime to be fixed. We delete it as soon as we are aware of it, and unless the author is likely to self-request revision deletion upon fixing it, giving them time to do so has the strong potential to cause continued harm to the rights holders. G11 is similar: we get rid of it on sight as advertising is actively harmful to the mission of building a trustworthy encyclopedia. The way the criterion is written, if something can be fixed with minor changes to not be 1960s adspeak (which most spammers don't use anymore), then it doesn't qualify and an admin won't delete it. If it does qualify under the strict rules of G11 (IMO, too strict) then it should be deleted if it was created 1 second ago. Waiting 15 minutes isn't going to change that. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:30, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

• • OK, thanks for the info Atlantic306 (talk) 14:34, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Regunta Yesurathnam

Hi, I've noticed your note for 'keep' on Regunta Yesurathnam. Thanks.Meher Mansion (talk) 18:05, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Peter Thiel

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Peter Thiel. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Please review Caillou Pettis

Can you please look over the draft available for the article on Caillou Pettis and see if it is good to submit for actual publication? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SimplyBatman22 (talk • contribs) 00:22, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Leo Tolstoy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Leo Tolstoy. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Wedding dress of Meghan Markle

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Wedding dress of Meghan Markle. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Moubani Sorcar

Hi Atlantic306. Because you didn't use any edit summaries in your edits to Moubani Sorcar and didn't indicate a reference for any of the new information, I went ahead and reverted it all per BLP. I'm also concerned that you restored, nilkantho.in . Ignoring all the spamming involved with it, as best that I can tell it's a blog made to look like a news site (or a small-time news website that's little more than a blog). If you can read it fluently, perhaps you have more insight into it? --Ronz (talk) 16:41, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

• • Hi, i left an edit summary of ce which is comparable to yours of Refspam? when you removed most of the article without a proper edit summary. Only contentious material should be removed instantly you could have tried to source the filmography and awards instead of just removing them. Also, I moved the contested ref to external link as it is an interview and basic facts are allowed from interviews, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 16:49, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

"ce" while adding apparently unreferenced information to a BLP that had just been stubbed with edit summaries of "REFSPAM" and "not a reliable source"?! Sorry, but you didn't really address any of the obvious policy concerns. I assume you're aware that BLP requires biographical information to be sourced to high-quality material or be removed.

I was hoping you could read the interview with fluency, and had insight into whether the site is just a blog (and so cannot be used at all), or might be ever-so-slightly enough more than a blog that it might be used for some basic information. The problem with such websites is that they scrape and copy material from other sources without attribution, so we'd need some assurances that this is not the case here. --Ronz (talk) 17:16, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Succession to the British throne

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Succession to the British throne. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Block

Kuru (talk · contribs) Hi, seem to be caught up in your ip block. Am editing from a bar in Dornoch, Highlands , Scotland logged in not as an ip, and am not the ip referred to as I 99% edit logged in thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 15:00, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

• • changed location, ok now, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 15:39, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

please help me correct the table format

hello,could you help me correct the table format? i am not knowledgable in HTML language and get something wrong. 5.Concerts [Zhang]

• • I think its ok now, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 18:25, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Atlantic306! You created a thread called Malformed pages at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Delivered by Muninnbot, an automated account. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018

Hello Atlantic306, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:

• WP:ACREQ has been implemented. The flow at the feed has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Deletion tags

• Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.

Backlog drive:

• A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at WT:NPR for more details. NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

Editathons

• There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Paid editing - new policy

• Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

• The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
• Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies.

Not English

• A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential.

News

• Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.
• The next issue of The Signpost has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.

---

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Julius Evola

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Julius Evola. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much

The RfC discussion to eliminate portals was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up.

By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

I'd also like to let you know that the Portals WikiProject is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity.

Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the WikiProject's talk page, or just stop by to see how we are doing. If you have any questions about portals or portal development, that is the best place to ask them.

If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the project's members receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted here, for your convenience.

Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   11:09, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

P.S.: if you reply to this message, please {{ping}} me. Thank you. -TT

Please comment on Talk:Junípero Serra

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Junípero Serra. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks!

I want to thank you for moving the redirect "Sayyeshaa" to "Sayyesha" without creating a further redirect. But I feel very bad that someone else moved the page "Sayyeshaa Saigal" to "Shayyeshaa" that I wanted to, soon after your work. All I wanted was to create a reasonable history of my edits so that can apply for page mover in future. But look, this is what happens with me always. I got one question. Does the page mover flag give us permission to delete the redirects for technical reasons? Harsh Rathod Poke me! 12:40, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi, yes if it is an unlikely redirect or a redirect out of mainspace or is holding up a page move and other reasons, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 13:34, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Swaragini TV series titlecard.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:42, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sports

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sports. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Substantial ?

[1], [2], [3], [4] – Ronjones only reduced the size of what has been already uploaded by the blocked user. CSD G5 says "no substantial edits by others" not "no edits by others".--Let There Be Sunshine 09:32, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

• • Its still a substantial edit as without it the file would be deleted, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 09:35, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

    Then it's indeed the second case "no edits by others", which is not the policy.--Let There Be Sunshine 09:39, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

    • ok, think its a grey area but will revert on those images, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 09:43, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Redirect

Regarding Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 May 18#Wikipedia:Other crap exists, are you aware that we still have WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS? The same deletion reasons may apply and it might be worth a discussion. This redirect has been kept a couple of times before, though, but consensus can change of course. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 16:32, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

• • Thanks I missed that one, as the lower case one was deleted and had the same target the RFD may well cover this one so will boldly change the title and if anyone objects will take it to RFD, thanksAtlantic306 (talk) 16:49, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Alex Jones

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alex Jones. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Substantial edits

The removal of a cast list which was later reverted is not a substantial edit. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:43, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

• • In your opinion you mean, Atlantic306 (talk) 17:44, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

It's not my opinion, it's basic and common sense. A one sentence, unsourced line while removing content is not a substantial edit. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:46, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

On second look it does appear a vandal edit so agree with you its a valid G5, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 17:52, 28 May 2018 (UTC)17:51, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Now that you've come around to the G5, please also restore the tag here as there is no substantial edits by another and editing one line yourself, calling it substantial really makes it a conflict for you to decide whether it should be removed or not. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:58, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

• • • No , thats a substantial edit in a stub article of most of its prose, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 18:00, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

"Let me rephrase, because you have a conflict here, I am asking you to restore to let a neutral party decide whether your edit is substantial enough to avoid a G5 deletion. If you believe that this does not meet the criteria for deletion, an administrator should be able to figure that out too. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:06, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

• • copyediting an article during NPP is not a conflict of interest Atlantic306 (talk) 18:09, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Minor CE during NPP is not substantial editing and by your definition, if it were and is currently, you are not in a position to be removing a speedy deletion tag from an article for the same reason we tell creators not to. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:12, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

• Copyediting an entire article is not a minor edit and NPP editors do not have a conflict of interest ask an admin as you are just making up policy. Also please stay away from my talkpage and take it off your watchlist and ill reciprocate, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 18:19, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

I agree with Chrissymad: Unless you rewrite the page in its entirety so that none of the blocked user's contributions remains, I'd suggest leaving the speedy deletion tag on the page and leaving it for the reviewing admin to decide whether the page should be deleted. Huon (talk) 18:31, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

• • Disagree, the policy doesnt say that, it states any substantial edits and thats the way most admins enforce it, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 18:33, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

If you want to argue whether your interpretation of "substantive" agrees with admin enforcement, you're welcome. Huon (talk) 18:42, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

(edit conflict)You don't appear to understand what substantial editing is, it's based on content, not gnomish fixes to blocked editor's work or semi-automated edits. Basic CE is minor, it is not substantial. With that said, I'm going to request that you stop declining G5's that aren't blatant vandalism (ie. placed when it's clear there was no blocked editor) based on this: You removed one here based on this edit which is basic copyediting and I suspect that editor would agree that is not substantial. I would not consider the edits here to be substantial, nor was the IP's edits here. I can go on, but you get my point. Precedent shows that most G5 deletions are in line with both what Huon and I have said, not your assumption that most admins would consider minor edits to be substantial. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:46, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

• • • Ive asked you once to stay away from my talkpage and you are not an admin you are a 2year editor like me with no authority to tell people what to do. We obviously disagree and am going to take it to deletion review and will abide by the views there about G5s ( I wont remove anymore untill the decision there) thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 18:54, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Steve Down

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Steve Down. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mehmet Oz

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mehmet Oz. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Woody Allen

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Woody Allen. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Articles created by FloridaArmy and now draftified

Hi I saw that you submitted and then withdrew the submission for Draft:Louisiana State Cotton Museum. I don't know if you have been following the saga but it has been decided here to review the article creations by User:FloridaArmy and draftify those that are unsuitable for mainspace so that they can be improved and submitted. I have taken on this task. I have moved obvious exemples with just a reference to the community decision those that are not obvious I have checked out notability, sourcing and history and where there is a serious doubt I have moved them giving a reason for doing it. I have already moved 27 of the articles and left probably as many and for the moment I have only checked out half the month of May and I still have about 40 to look at. if you're interested i am keeping a log of those I have moved here User:Domdeparis/sandbox/FloridaArmy moves into draft space to enable a batch notification. cheers Dom from Paris (talk) 14:24, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

• • Hi, yes am aware of it all but I dont think this one is too bad as its not a BLP and seems a valid topic of a State owned museum. It needs independent refs so will look for some when have more time, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 18:12, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Kya Haal Mr. Paanchal?

The image on info box is wrong. I've updated the image. Revert my edit Xenon One (talk) 18:55, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:InfoWars

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:InfoWars. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:H.J. Whitley

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:H.J. Whitley. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Categorization/Ethnicity, gender, religion and sexuality

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Categorization/Ethnicity, gender, religion and sexuality. Legobot (talk) 07:14, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Brian Martin (social scientist)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Brian Martin (social scientist). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Roseanne Barr

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Roseanne Barr. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Deepika Padukone

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Deepika Padukone. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lawrence Liang

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lawrence Liang. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ronald Reagan

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ronald Reagan. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jonathan Sarfati

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jonathan Sarfati. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The courteous Scottish Barnstar
		"A personal appreciation towards Atlantic306, for his extended concern on article reviewing, article-reference archiving, and a self-initiative step in guiding me on image-uploading" Thank you very much Atlantic306!! --Gpkp (talk) 09:02, 9 June 2018 (UTC)}

Please comment on Talk:Kate Spade

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kate Spade. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jordan Peterson

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jordan Peterson. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jordan Peterson

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jordan Peterson. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Fred (2014 film) poster.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:15, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Agha Mohammad Khan Qajar

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Agha Mohammad Khan Qajar. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Deprecated Template:Orphan parameter

Hi. I'm asking about this edit. I looked at the village pumps but couldn't find any relevant discussion. Can you point me to the discussion you referred to in your edit summary "rvd deprecated as per VP"? Thanks, wbm1058 (talk) 17:08, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Richard B. Spencer

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Richard B. Spencer. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Alex Jones

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alex Jones. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Atlantic306, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.

Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!

• As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
• Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: . Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: , , , .
• Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.

---

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:InfoWars

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:InfoWars. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jimmy Savile

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jimmy Savile. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Carrie Underwood

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Carrie Underwood. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:OTHERCRAPEXISTS listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:OTHERCRAPEXISTS. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:OTHERCRAPEXISTS redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:26, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of YouTubers

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of YouTubers. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Your unnecessarily vandalizing edits on Monster High: Boo York, Boo York

Hi, your edit on Monster High: Boo York, Boo York was reverted by me because it seems a bit to unnecessary to not only be removing the wikia links but removing all of the constructive edits from the last logged in user..... You should know that that is what I call vandalism because you should have just removed the wikia links not all of the other references given by the user because those were constructive edits so please do not revert back or else you will be starting an edit war, Thank You! — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrutBROWS (talk • contribs) 15:54, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

The edit included a huge lump of content copied from wikia fandom. Add the references seperately, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 16:10, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

BrutBROWS, copying from other sources is not allowed WP:COPYPASTE, however if the text is open license/public domain you could consider. However, per WP:FILMPLOT, the summary that is currently on that page is excessive (933 words) and should be heavily trimmed to 400-700 per WP:FILMPLOT I would suggest rewriting it in your own words. It is not vandalism to delete allegedly copy-pasted text, so please do not accuse Atlantic306 of that. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:52, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Amazing China

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Amazing China. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:White Helmets (Syrian Civil War)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:White Helmets (Syrian Civil War). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Wayward Pines

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Wayward Pines. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2018 in heavy metal music

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2018 in heavy metal music. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sapna Babul Ka...Bidaai

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sapna Babul Ka...Bidaai. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Melania Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Melania Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Patrick Treacy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Patrick Treacy. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Just wanted to pop in to thank you for checking on the band deletion requests I've been doing such as this. I'm going through a category of orphans and while the accuracy rate for my deletions still seems to be pretty good, the one I linked above did have reviews, so thanks for keeping it in check, I went on a bit of a spree!

StraussInTheHouse (talk) 10:52, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

• thanks for the kitten, I check all six day old prods and some new csds every day, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 11:03, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

large removal

Hello Atlantic306.

Can you explain this? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:00, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

• • Answered on your talk page, a cock up by myself accidentally editing an old version of the page, have corrected, apologies Atlantic306 (talk) 11:06, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
    • Thanks, I was in much too much of a rush myself to work myself how to fix what I guessed was a mistake. A simple revert would have made a bigger mess. And some of it may well have been better never said, so I wasn't sure. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:33, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sierra Hull

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sierra Hull. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Madonna (entertainer)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Madonna (entertainer). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 June 2018

• From the editor: The Admin Ship is still barely afloat, while a Foundation project risks sinking

• Special report: NPR and AfC – The Marshall Plan: an engagement and a marriage?

• Op-ed: What do admins do?

• Opinion: Google isn't responsible for Wikipedia's mistakes

• News and notes: Money, milestones, and Wikimania

• In the media: Much wikilove from the Mayor of London, less from Paekākāriki or a certain candidate for U.S. Congress

• Discussion report: Deletion, page moves, and an update to the main page

• Featured content: New promotions

• Arbitration report: WWII, UK politics, and a user deCrat'ed

• Traffic report: Endgame

• Technology report: Improvements piled on more improvements

• Gallery: Wiki Loves Africa

• Blog: Wikipedia should be open for editors in Turkey

• Recent research: How censorship can backfire and conversations can go awry

• Humour: Television plot lines

• Wikipedia essays: This month's pick by The Signpost editors

• From the archives: Wolves nip at Wikipedia's heels: A perspective on the cost of paid editing

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Yusuf bin Ahmad al-Kawneyn

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Yusuf bin Ahmad al-Kawneyn. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Darren Harriott

Hi.

You say you might be able to create the Darren Harriott page for me, so I was wondering if you could do so as I believe he is a very good comedian and deserves his own Wikipedia page.

Yours, Joe. Joeblundy010102 (talk) 13:36, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

• • Hi, am a bit busy at present so in the meantime can you start building your userspace version, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 13:57, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Julius Evola

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Julius Evola. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Natalie Portman

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Natalie Portman. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox criminal

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox criminal. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Steve Down

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Steve Down. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:John Taylor, Baron Taylor of Warwick

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:John Taylor, Baron Taylor of Warwick. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Alexander Korea birth year

Hi! I see that you have reverted my edit about possible birth year of al. Korda because of "original search". Yet the sources I used, are used constantly in bio articles to verify birth years by many users. Why in this case are not acceptable??178.59.246.93 (talk) 14:33, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

• • Because you are making a judgement yourself rather than quoting a secondary source's analysis of the dates. Also, it is too long and undue weight, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 14:40, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed blocked sockpuppet AfDs

Thanks for removing some AfDs by 2Joules. Here is another: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Krystal_Duhaney.

Although it may be TOOSOON for this article, I am sorry that his aggressive approach to removing women from Wikipedia has snared this young African American entrepreneur. What do you think should happen now? I will defer to your judgment. HouseOfChange (talk) 22:27, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Linda Sarsour

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Linda Sarsour. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of one-hit wonders in the United States

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of one-hit wonders in the United States. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajatsubhra Majumdar

This should really be a speedy keep, not a keep. Could you change the AfD page and talk page box accordingly? —C.Fred (talk) 20:33, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

• • have corrected, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 11:04, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Imran Awan

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Imran Awan. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Darren Jeffries

I am currently attempting to add references to the additions I made, but this has been made difficult by you reverting the article to the previous edit. Can you allow time for references to be added before reverting please — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:EAF:CB00:FD2E:E9D3:F9B1:DBB8 (talk) 12:03, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Agha Mohammad Khan Qajar

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Agha Mohammad Khan Qajar. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

AIV tip

Hey, when you put in a report at AIV, if you include "User:" in the template, it breaks it. I fixed your existing report; it had been showing the user you reported as unregistered. Home Lander (talk) 14:17, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

thanks for fixing that Atlantic306 (talk) 14:19, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion: Abdullah Qureshi (Singer)

Thank you for your review and the identifying the reasons for the deletion. Can I correct them and create the page again? Please advise... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eqwf1 (talk • contribs) 19:14, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

• • hi, yes you can recreate it but it needs to be in neutral language like a written encyclopedia with no praising or hyperbole- for example instead of saying award-wiining say they won the specific awards on what dates. Also, no direct copying is allowed. It is also best started in your userspace before it goes to mainspace. If you like you can ask me to review it in your userspace and if its ready I will move it to mainspace but i'll be offline soon until tomorrow, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 19:28, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Hey, thank you so much for this help really appreciated. Have a great day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eqwf1 (talk • contribs) 20:07, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Eugene Gu

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Eugene Gu. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Anna Frants article

Hi, Atlantic306!

Some months ago you put {{refimprove}} template on Anna Frants article.

We did a lot to make article better!

May be now it's time to remove the template, please?)) This person do worth it!

--Pustov (talk) 11:11, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Roop - Mard Ka Naya Swaroop TV series.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:11, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Elon Musk

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Elon Musk. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Disappearance of Asha Degree

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Disappearance of Asha Degree. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Scinde Railway

I saw that you removed the G12 tag, but just for info, the "copied" site appears to have a non-commercial CC licence, which we don't accept. However, I agree with your action because judging by the dates, that page appears to be copied from Wikipedia, not the other way around Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:00, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

• • Thanks for the info Atlantic306 (talk) 13:29, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Cathy Newman

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cathy Newman. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rahul Easwar

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rahul Easwar. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

AfD Non-Admin Closure query/help

Hi,

After a reasonably lengthy AfD exposure I've recently thought I should help out with some non-admin bits of the administration - relisting, nac keeps etc. I hadn't realised that redirects could also be done as non-admin closures. Beyond the obvious (non-controversial both overall and specified target), I thought I'd ask if there was anything in particular I should bear in mind.

Many Thanks,

Nosebagbear (talk) 21:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

p.s. Distinct from that (please ignore it if overstepping) - how come you haven't become an admin?

Thanks, provided they are non-controversial nac's can include keep, speedy keep, no consensus, redirect, or merge but it is best left to discussions where such a close has obvious, majority support not just in votes but in rationales. Regarding adminship, have recently been advised by an admin to wait at least 3 years due to misdemeanors, thanks , will be offline till tomorrow Atlantic306 (talk) 22:03, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:George Galloway

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:George Galloway. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Andrew Brunson

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Andrew Brunson. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

+

The references that were removed weren't applicable at this point of time and new references were added as well to compensate. A few articles were only assumptions and had no relation to the context. Please understand before reverting. Meenalxoxo (talk) 06:17, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Naz Shah

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Naz Shah. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Declined speedy deletion nomination of Marek Mádle

Hello Atlantic306. Speedy deletion work is important and I do appreciate the effort. I would just ask that you please review the criteria carefully because accuracy is also important. On that issue, I have declined your speedy deletion nomination of Marek Mádle as an article that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the topic under CSD A7. That criterion did not apply because being a semi-professional footballer for a notable club is a credible claim of significance, I've left the PROD in place though. Thanks. Iffy★Chat -- 11:53, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Oscar Wilde Memorial Sculpture

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Oscar Wilde Memorial Sculpture. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Quantico (season 3)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Quantico (season 3). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of Kiran Tabeer

Hi! Sorry for causing problems due to this article. I will delete it as you asked me. However , after deleting this article, can I recreate it after a few days, with references from notable sites that you mentioned? Or if it is not possible, can you then please move the article to draft space? Please tell me if any of the two options is possible? As now I have learned my mistakes, and I am ready to improve the article. Now I also know that which references are not acceptable. Thank you Knightrises10 (talk) 07:31, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Ok, after she gets a new role, should I create a draft or the article directly? Knightrises10 (talk) 11:23, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

• probably draft due to the AFD, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 11:32, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Water sustainability at UBC for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Water sustainability at UBC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Water sustainability at UBC until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ElKevbo (talk) 16:35, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Kabhi Aaye Na Judaai titlecard.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:10, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Domestic violence

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Domestic violence. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

		The Special Barnstar
		for being the most polite and helpful user Knightrises10 (talk) 12:08, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

• Thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 13:27, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. ()

Hello Atlantic306, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

June backlog drive

Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.

New technology, new rules

• New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
• Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
• Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.

Editathons

• Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

The Signpost

• The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.

---

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Tham Luang cave rescue

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tham Luang cave rescue. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Roboto Project

I have to say I disagree with your close. I get what you are saying, obviously greater particpation probably would have led to a clearer result, but as far as policy-based arguments go, both I and the other “delete” comment made them, and the single keep voter tacked on some WP:ROUTINE sources without actually adding a single word to the article, and then added their novel, admittedly unproven theory that this club may have influenced others when in fact the article makes it clear that it was inspired by a much more well know club in California. In short, no compelling argument to keep was made in my opinion. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:57, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

• • Hi, with the one keep vote that added references I think it really needed more than one delete vote for a consensus, if it hadn't had the 3wks would have relisted. Suggest renomination rather than dreview thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 19:04, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
    • Renominating with a recent no-consensus closure is going to potentially skew the discussion that takes place at a subsequent AfD, hell, I'll be amazed if it's not almost the subject of another shitty NAC from another over enthusiastic admin wannabee such as yourself. You need to revert the closure and re-list, with an explanation of why your closure was incorrect. And you need to stop making shitty NACs in future. Nick (talk) 19:26, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

(edit conflict)Too late:

==Deletion review for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Roboto Project==

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Roboto Project. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:29, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Albert Cashier

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Albert Cashier. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2018

• From the editor: If only if

• Op-ed: The last leg of the Admin Ship's current cruise

• Opinion: Wrestling with Wikipedia reality

• News and notes: Another newspaper for Wikipedia; Wikimania 2018 ends; changes at NPR

• In the media: Blackouts in Europe; Wikipedia and capitalists; WMF Jet Set

• Discussion report: Wikipedias take action against EU copyright proposal, plus new user right proposals

• Featured content: Wikipedia's best content in images and prose

• Arbitration report: Status quo processes retained in two disputes

• Traffic report: Soccer, football, call it what you like – that and summer movies leave room for little else

• Technology report: New bots, new prefs

• Gallery: Independence days, national holidays, and football – all in July

• Blog: Motivation of two editors

• Recent research: Different Wikipedias use different images; editing contests more successful than edit-a-thons

• Humour: It's all the same

• Essay: Wikipedia does not need you

• From the archives: The pending changes fiasco: how an attempt to answer one question turned into a quagmire

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:51, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

/* Section on Electric Jukebox (the company) and new topic on ROXI */ Proposing new ROXI page instead of adding it as a section to this page.

Hi Atlantic306, thanks for your feedback on adding a section on ROXI to the Electric Jukebox page. Following your feedback I will submit an article on ROXI for creation as you suggest. Thank you again for your recommendations. Tho2009 (talk) 12:48, 1 August 2018 (UTC) No problem, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 12:56, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Elon Musk

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Elon Musk. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Philip II of Spain

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Philip II of Spain. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mohammad bin Salman

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mohammad bin Salman. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mohammad bin Salman

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mohammad bin Salman. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Martha McSally

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Martha McSally. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Skipper Limited logo.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:15, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Joan Freeman (Irish psychologist)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Joan Freeman (Irish psychologist). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mohammad bin Salman

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mohammad bin Salman. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, Atlantic306. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Knightrises10 (talk) 18:51, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Brett Kavanaugh

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Brett Kavanaugh. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mike Chang (fitness trainer)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mike Chang (fitness trainer). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

16:31:05, 19 October 2016 review of submission by Hightopdancer55

• Hightopdancer55 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Micro Museum (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am trying to get Micro Museum's page up on wikipedia as a part of our 30th anniversary and uncertain about the feedback below. I am confused, especially the first sentence. Can you clarify how I should be citing references? My question for example - I have listed a few names of people who were guest curators. How should I be citing them for approval? Are you looking for bio materials? their personal approval? I am not sure. The quotes and awards are documented but appear to need more citation. Can you clue me as to what exactly would be acceptable. Further.... would it be wise for me to remove unacceptable materials for help expedite this approval process?

"Everything in the article should be cited to references. At present there are large sections without references, all of the quotes and awards must each have a reference. Also, external links are not allowed in the text except within references. On the plus side the museum is notable and deserves an article." Hightopdancer55 (talk)

fixed image as per WP:INFOBOXIMAGE 18:59, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Matthew Schultz

The NYT article is not in dispute. Although it is a review that mentions the Schultz. That would be the only viable mention. It's a vanity project. Please delete. Rudolph

Ced Atlantic306 (talk) 19:01, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Chronicle notability

Hi. You challenged the proposed deletion of Chronicle (UK TV series) based on the assumption that it’s likely to be notable, though the article’s only sources are primary or user-generated (which usually indicates a subject isn’t). Could you demonstrate its notability? Thanks. —67.14.236.193 (talk) 18:57, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

• BBC series are reviewed in reliable sources such as The Guardian and the Daily Telegraph, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 19:11, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Has this one been? The article has no mention of reviews. —67.14.236.193 (talk) 19:15, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Per WP:INDISCRIMINATE, To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent sources. An extensive list of episode titles and airdates is sorely lacking in that regard. You clearly believe the series to be sufficiently notable for inclusion, and we’d most likely be able to pull contextual info from whatever sources you’ve seen it discussed in. I could have a go at it myself if you’d be willing to share what you’ve found. —67.14.236.193 (talk) 02:28, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Have a very big backlog at present, episode lists are not indiscriminate as there are hundreds of lists that are just episode lists so an episode list is expected for a tv series. Of course other content is needed but the list should not be removed, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 16:35, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
    • An episode list that is not put in context with explanations referenced to independent sources is indiscriminate. If we really have hundreds of such articles with no episode summaries, production, reception, nothing, then we have hundreds of indiscriminate lists, which isn’t good and doesn’t make another one okay. If there’s nothing else to say in the article, it’s pretty much a shoo-in for AFD. So I ask again, what led you to believe that this particular series was WP:notable? —67.14.236.193 (talk) 00:59, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Minor barnstar

Hello Atlantic306, thank you for having a look at the page I think you are makinga mistake by deleting the new content though. I am eiditng. But why are you deleting all the information I add? There are LOTS of new info, photos and proof in new version. You do not know the person I am wirint about But you delete the new info. And keep reverting to the old version Why do you do that? It is not easy to find reference ONLINE for peolpe who lived in another decade, without digital publishing. There is enough physical evidence. You do not even know the person who I write about, who is prominent, well-known and solid historical fact. Why do you keep deleting my contect? Please stop, Or please explain. Wikipedia is saying that editors should be careful while providing editing. Can you please be careful and use your knowledge? Or you can personally research on the topic which I am writing about? Then you will see. Please let me know what is your issue with this page. Thanks Dulani-tilakasiri (talk) 20:04, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

(uninvolved editor) @Dulani-tilakasiri: I think you maybe pressed the wrong button? A barnstar is typically used to congratulate or thank someone, not to criticize or question. —67.14.236.193 (talk) 01:55, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Caucher Birkar

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Caucher Birkar. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Timeline of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Timeline of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Deewana (TV series)

Thank you for uploading image of Deewana (TV series), however their are many famous Pakistani drama series whose images are not uploaded at wiki. Will you help me regarding additions of images to them. RidaJunejo (talk) 21:33, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Death year and age

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Death year and age. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ayn Rand

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ayn Rand. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sarah Jeong

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sarah Jeong. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Now That's What I Call Music! 67 (UK series)

I'm minded to overturn your closure and delete in line with the consensus established at that discussion, but will allow you the chance to explain at the AfD your closure rationale before deciding finally on how to proceed. Nick (talk) 21:04, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Nadine Dorries

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Nadine Dorries. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ernest Shackleton

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ernest Shackleton. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Back in Black

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Back in Black. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Tyson Fury

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tyson Fury. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

14:36:41, 13 February 2017 review of submission by 183.82.196.9

• 183.82.196.9 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Aakatayi Movie (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Aakatayi is Telugu movie releasing this month and the cast of the movie is big celebrities of Telugu industry. So we want represent our movie in wikipedia, So that Our movie will have authentic and known to everyone.

Can you please help me how to improve article.

Thank you

• archive Atlantic306 (talk) 12:02, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

McLeod Russel | Article about a tea company in india

I edited the article named "McLEOD RUSSEL" on 20:18, 7 April 2017‎, with proper reference. and you reverted the article on 00:42, 8 April 2017 without any reference. may i know why you did this while all my information was correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhaydhodria (talk • contribs)

• archive Atlantic306 (talk) 12:02, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Article re-written awaiting for review

Dear Atlantic306

Thank you for your feedback last time. I have re-writen the article in neutral tone with most of the references are from realiable Australian government websites https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cenakhoa/Keep_victoria_beautiful If you have time please help me to review it, I really appreciate your help and contribution. Thank you again in advance,

Khoa

• archive Atlantic306 (talk) 12:03, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Dennis Prager

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dennis Prager. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banstead Woods Parkrun

Hi I believe that you were mistaken when you closed this Afd. I think the article creator as per his message on the talk page deliberately nominated it to have the discussion and have a consensus about its notability. I think that you should probably contact them and eventually reopen the afd or renominate if that is not possible. Dom from Paris (talk) 21:12, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

• • Hi, it's already been renominated, but an article cannot be nominated by a keep voter for a discussion as per WP:Speedy Keep criteria 1 which says a deletion rationale is needed and in this case the deletion rationale was not credible as he immediately stated the opposite regards Atlantic306 (talk) 21:47, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
    • Ok thanks for the pointer. Cheers Dom from Paris (talk) 21:59, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Object-oriented business engineering

Hello Atlantic306. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Object-oriented business engineering, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:50, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Yeah! Woo!

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Yeah! Woo!. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Keith Ellison

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Keith Ellison. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:James Randi

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:James Randi. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lionel Messi

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lionel Messi. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Peter Thiel

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Peter Thiel. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:John McCain

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:John McCain. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Joey Gibson (political activist)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Joey Gibson (political activist). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2018

• From the editor: Today's young adults don't know a world without Wikipedia

• Interview: 2018 Wikimedian of the Year, Farkhad Fatkullin

• News and notes: Flying high; low practice from Wikipedia 'cleansing' agency; where do our donations go? RfA sees a new trend

• In the media: Quicksilver AI writes articles

• Discussion report: Drafting an interface administrator policy

• Featured content: Featured content selected by the community

• Special report: Wikimania 2018

• Traffic report: Aretha dies – getting just 2,000 short of 5 million hits

• Technology report: Technical enhancements and a request to prioritize upcoming work

• Gallery: Leapfrog, historic Thai cave, and a rhythmic beat

• Recent research: Wehrmacht on Wikipedia, neural networks writing biographies

• Humour: Signpost editor censors herself

• Essay: Principle of Some Astonishment

• From the archives: Playing with Wikipedia words

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:04, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of IMAX DMR films

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of IMAX DMR films. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		Thanks for your recent work reviewing new articles. Cheers, — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 04:21, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

• Thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 12:35, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hip hop music

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hip hop music. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Faizan Shaikh

The BLP cites at-least four unreliable sources. --Saqib (talk) 18:49, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gatestone Institute

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gatestone Institute. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Roseanne Barr

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Roseanne Barr. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, Atlantic306. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Knightrises10 (talk) 19:39, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of Nabil Ayad

Another user marked this page for deletion, which you essentially blocked. I've been trying to find any concrete sources and citations for any of the claims made in the article – entirely without success. The page is a resume, and a suspiciously vague yet grandiose one at that. Ayad seems little more than an obscure figure in diplomatic training. I wouldn't even call him an academic; I can't find sources to verify that he has contributed to academia, authored any papers, participated in any studies, or even that he is entitled to call himself 'professor.'

Why should it not be deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ProfanityFair (talk • contribs) 20:35, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Wachowskis

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Wachowskis. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Cantus Musicus

Hi, I was surprised to see you reinstated an article that does not coply with encyclopedic tone used on Wikipedia and not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline. Other than that, cant you see most of the references are "on Text based" which cant be verified? The article ought to be redone or delete. --Jay (talk) 07:01, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

I have put up this matter to be discussed in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 September 3 --Jay (talk) 07:34, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Please reconsider

Hi !User:Atlantic306 I was surprised to see that you branded me a probable sock puppet on Internationalist Theatre and reverted my edits to a previous edit, All I did was remove flickr. links which are not acceptable to Wikipedia . The Lindsay Anderson link regarding the Teneseee Williams play is also from Flickr and should be removed. Please consider restoring my edit. {___} Souxroux {92.8.115.249 (talk) 14:20, 3 September 2018 (UTC)}

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Souxroux (talk • contribs) 14:10, 3 September 2018 (UTC) 

apologize Souxroux Souxroux {Souxroux (talk) 14:21, 3 September 2018 (UTC)}

Please comment on Talk:Guardians of the Galaxy (film)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Guardians of the Galaxy (film). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Hey

Can you tell me what does OR mean? Thanks, Knightrises10 15:48, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

• Hi @Knightrises10:, OR means Original Research, basically information that does not have a reference to confirm it, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 16:14, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Oh, I see! Knightrises10 16:21, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:How to write a plot summary

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:How to write a plot summary. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

** I only actively edit warred with 2 editors Natureism, (you're right 2 reverts) and Chrissymad- I didnt realise I was edit warring with Bradv and did not edit war with Waggie Atlantic306 (talk) 19:02, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

AfroCine: Join us for the Months of African Cinema in October!

Greetings!

You are receiving this message because your username or portal was listed as a participant of a WikiProject that is related to Africa, the Carribean, Cinema or theatre.

This is to introduce you to a new Wikiproject called AfroCine. This new project is dedicated to improving the Wikipedia coverage of the history, works, people, places, events, etc, that are associated with the cinema, theatre and arts of Africa, African countries, the carribbean, and the diaspora. If you would love to be part of this or you're already contributing in this area, kindly list your name as a participant on the project page here.

Furthermore, In the months of October and November, the WikiProject is organizing a global on-wiki contest and edit-a-thon tagged: The Months of African Cinema. If you would love to join us for this exciting event, also list your username as a participant for this event here. In preparation for the contest, please do suggest relevant articles that need to be created or expanded in different countries, during this event!

If you have any questions, complaints, suggestions, etc., please reach out to me personally on my talkpage! Cheers!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

Your recent editing history at Peter Emslie shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Natureium (talk) 17:01, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Peter Emslie. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  TonyBallioni (talk) 17:01, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

@TonyBallioni: no warning before the block, only 3 reverts, original edit was by @DGG: which I restored, Atlantic306 (talk) 17:04, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

• will be offline for an hour, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 17:05, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Four reverts in less than 20 minutes. FWIW, I agree with you that WorldCat is enough to overcome BLPPROD, but when three editors disagree with you, you don’t keep reverting. You discuss. The edit warring policy is clear that edit warring is wrong, even if you are right. When there is a legitimate disagreement, we discuss. When multiple editors disagree with you, you don’t keep insisting you are right and keep reverting. You take it up with them on their talk or on the article talk. As for a warning: you’re an experienced editor. You know better than to edit war. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:09, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
    • @TonyBallioni: It seems clear to me that Atlantic306 was not aware that he violated 3RR. I'm sure he would self-revert if he was asked, and the block seems punitive to me. wumbolo ^^^ 17:38, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
      • He was reverting multiple different editors after being directly asked to take it to talk, and the disruption was ongoing. Even if he hadn’t broken 3RR (which he unambiguously did), a block would have been justified here for repeating the same revert multiple times in a 20 minute period: he thought he was right, he didn’t care who disagreed with him, and he was actively edit warring to see his interpretation of policy enforced on a BLP. None of the other editors involved got anywhere near 3RR, so full protection would not have been justified when a block of one person would stop the edit war: policy prefers blocking to protection when it will stop disruption. There was only one editor edit warring to remove the tag, and he was doing it against multiple people who disagreed with him. A block in this case was 100% preventative and the admin action most justifiable by policy. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:46, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

@TonyBallioni: Can you please check your facts as I did 3 reverts and on 2 editors not 3. The first edit I made was a deprod removing the prod which was not a revert at all. Then I was the subject of the first revert on the page by Natureism , which I reverted then Chrissymad reverted saying take it to the talkpage and I did look there but there was no discussion there then, then I reverted 2 edits by Natureism who also made 3 reverts in total and was the first to revert. I agree that I should have taken it to the talkpage and will be more careful in future, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 18:36, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

One, two, three, four. I have my facts correct. You reverted another editor reverting DGG's removal of a PROD: context matters. Even if you hadn't hit four reverts, I would have blocked you: 3 reverts of the same exact item in 20 minutes is ridiculous, and 3RR is not a right. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:42, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

• The first edit was not a revert ... Atlantic306 (talk) 18:44, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Here is the sequence of edits for the first one DGG removes, Bradv contests the removal, you restore DGG's removal. You then after your block say that you restored DGG's edit, which shows that you did in fact think of it as a revert/challenging the restoration of the BLPPROD, and again, even if we don't count it, 3RR is not a right, and someone who repeats the same exact edit that many times in such a short period is likely to end up blocked. Finally, re: your post below. Yes, the fact that three different editors disagreed with you should have told you to stop and talk to them. Also, Natureium only reverted twice. Chrissymad once. Waggie once, and Bradv once (when he reverted DGG). TonyBallioni (talk) 18:56, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Also, I was reverted 4 times in 20minutes Atlantic306 (talk) 18:45, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

• • I didnt realise I was editwarring with bradv as any editor is allowed to remove an incorrect blpprod, and I was blocked when Waggie edited Atlantic306 (talk) 19:05, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
    • I don't think you're getting my point: edit warring is not about who you are reverting or if you are right. It is about you insisting that you are right and not considering the objections of others. I mentioned Waggie to show that no other editor had near as many reverts as you did. You knew you were undoing Bradv (you said as much after the block in the diff I linked above), you knew that other editors objected to it. You continued reverting anyway. I'm concerned that an editor with your experience doesn't get this very basic concept: when someone challenges your edit, you talk. If multiple people disagree with the actions you are taking, you have even more reason to talk.
      As I said, I agree with your point re: the BLPPROD, but the correct thing here would have been to go to Natureium and ask them if they would mind taking it at AfD so the source could have been discussed. Reverting someone you think is interpreting policy wrong is not an exception to edit warring, which is why you ended up blocked. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:11, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Should'nt this have gone to the edit war board or at least a request at your talkpage, were you asked to intervene through email? Atlantic306 (talk) 19:15, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
    • Administrators monitor administrative categories. The page you were edit warring on appeared and disappeared from the BLPPROD maintenance category repeatedly over a short period of time. I'm surprised there's not more administrators here shouting at you for edit warring (which you were). Nick (talk) 19:27, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
    • No one asked me to block. I saw the reversions, realized one editor was reverting multiple editors, and blocked to stop the disruption. We do not need an ANEW report or a warning to block for edit warring. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:30, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Atlantic306 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Primefac (talk) 19:24, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Primefac: I hadnt made my unblock request yet before you jumped in and please leave it to someone else who can at least wait for my request and Nick please leave it as we have had recent disagreements Atlantic306 (talk) 20:01, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

I wasn't going to handle your unblock request (below) precisely for that reason. I find it to be a good request, for what it's worth, indicating that you understand the errors in your editing behaviour today and resolving not to commit further errors of this type in future. Nick (talk) 20:15, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Since I was mentioned, I'll comment. It is particularly absurd to edit war over whether or not a BLP Prod is valid. The correct course is what [[[User:GB fan|GB fan]] did,which is to take it to AfD and get an definitive decision. By the way, Atlantic306, when I remove a blp prod, i am acting as an editor not an admin, and nobody need defer to me who disagrees. DGG ( talk ) 19:39, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

@DGG:: Absurd to edit war over it, absolutely. However, I wish to point out that GB fan's removal was not actually the correct course. Discussion on the talk page had been requested multiple times, and a thread on the talk page started, when GB fan removed the BLPPROD. This was not a PROD, where any objection is sufficient to avoid deletion, BLPPROD requires a reliable source that supports a statement being made in the article. The discussion was about removing the BLPPROD and whether the source was reliable or not, when there are clear indications it isn't. Thanks for your time. Waggie (talk) 03:28, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Atlantic306 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I realise I was wrong to edit war and should have taken it to the talkpage and in future I will be very careful to do so except when it is vandalism or blp violations such as unsourced content. However as I have never been blocked before I think I could have had a warning first, as the notice of editwarring arrived in the same minute as the block and I would have taken the warning. Also I didnt realise when I deprodded in the first edit that it was considered a revert as any editor can remove an invalid blpprod, also when Chrissymad said take it to the talkpage I did look but there was nothing there. However I recognise now that I should have started the discussion regards, Atlantic306 (talk) 20:01, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Unblocking as time served. Please be more careful going forward. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:46, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

• @TonyBallioni: I told you that Atlantic306 wasn't going to revert more than 3–4 times. I'm still not convinced that the block was preventative. wumbolo ^^^ 20:53, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
  • I am convinced it was, and the diffs and responses here after the block bear that out, but regardless it ceased being preventative with the unblock request, which is why he is no longer blocked. He wasn’t unblocked earlier because the discussion above showed a fundamental lack of understanding of basic policy. You also appear to share similar misunderstandings if you think not reverting “more than 3-4 times” in 20 minutes is acceptable. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:04, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
    • I agree with this; I was talking about the block in the first place. wumbolo ^^^ 21:20, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
      • Which was fully in line with policy and was preventative. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:22, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Daniel Mallory Ortberg

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Daniel Mallory Ortberg. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mattress Performance (Carry That Weight)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mattress Performance (Carry That Weight). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, Atlantic306. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Knightrises10 (talk) 15:45, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Bangarang#Billboard

Hi. If you have an issue with my edits feel free, and we can reach a consensus. 183.171.122.90 (talk) 12:44, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

• • hi, I haven't edited that article except for a comment on the talkpage just now, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 16:04, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bo Burnham

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bo Burnham. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jimmy Page

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jimmy Page. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mohammad bin Salman

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mohammad bin Salman. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ron Stallworth

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ron Stallworth. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Tom O'Carroll

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tom O'Carroll. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Francis Beaufort

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Francis Beaufort. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Geoffrey Owens

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Geoffrey Owens. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lisa Littman

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lisa Littman. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Winona Ryder

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Winona Ryder. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018

Hello Atlantic306, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.

Project news

• The New Page Feed now has a new "Articles for Creation" option which will show drafts instead of articles in the feed, this shouldn't impact NPP activities and is part of the WMF's AfC Improvement Project.

As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.

• There are a number of coordination tasks for New Page Patrol that could use some help from experienced reviewers. See Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Coordination#Coordinator tasks for more info to see if you can help out.

Other

• A new summary page of reliable sources has been created; Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources, which summarizes existing RfCs or RSN discussions about regularly used sources.

Moving to Draft and Page Mover

• Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they might have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at WP:DRAFTIFY.
• If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear conflict of interest.
• Articles that have been created in contravention of our paid-editing-requirements or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear COI might also be draftified at discretion.
• The best tool for draftification is User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js^(info). Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed like this). Note that if you do not have the Page Mover userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as CSD R2, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
• The Page Mover userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally page swapping is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at Requested Moves. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.

List of other useful scripts for New Page Reviewing

Twinkle provides a lot of the same functionality as the page curation tools, and some reviewers prefer to use the Twinkle tools for some/all tasks. It can be activated simply in the gadgets section of 'preferences'. There are also a lot of options available at the Twinkle preferences panel after you install the gadget. In terms of other gadgets for NPR, HotCat is worth turning on. It allows you to easily add, remove, and change categories on a page, with name suggestions. MoreMenu also adds a bunch of very useful links for diagnosing and fixing page issues. User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js(info): Installing scripts doesn't have to be complicated. Go to your common.js and copy importScript( 'User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js' ); into an empty line, now you can install all other scripts with the click of a button from the script page! (Note you need to be at the ".js" page for the script for the install button to appear, not the information page) User:TheJosh/Scripts/NewPagePatrol.js(info): Creates a scrolling new pages list at the left side of the page. You can change the number of pages shown by adding the following to the next line on your common.js page (immediately after the line importing this script): npp_num_pages=20; (Recommended 20, but you can use any number from 1 to 50). User:Primefac/revdel.js(info): Is requesting revdel complicated and time consuming? This script helps simplify the process. Just have the Copyvio source URL and go to the history page and collect your diff IDs and you can drop them into the script Popups and it will create a revdel request for you. User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js(info): Creates a "Page Curation" link to Special:NewPagesFeed up near your sandbox link. User:Writ Keeper/Scripts/deletionFinder.js: Creates links next to the title of each page which show up if it has been previously deleted or nominated for deletion. User:Evad37/rater.js(info): A fantastic tool for adding WikiProject templates to article talk pages. If you add: rater_autostartNamespaces = 0; to the next line on your common.js, the prompt will pop up automatically if a page has no Wikiproject templates on the talk page (note: this can be a bit annoying if you review redirects or dab pages commonly).

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ron DeSantis

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ron DeSantis. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 18 September 2018 (UTC)