User talk:Atweddle

Welcome!

Hello, Atweddle, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Image copyright problem with Image:Congo3.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Congo3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 10:08, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Title.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Title.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:07, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Alex Tweddle has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. G ! B B i 3 ^{I4m 733t0rz} 14:09, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Alex Tweddle constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. G ! B B i 3 ^{I4m 733t0rz} 14:11, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Alex Tweddle. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. G ! B B i 3 ^{I4m 733t0rz} 14:11, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Juarez City of Dreams. G ! B B i 3 ^{I4m 733t0rz} 14:13, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COI[edit]

Please read WP:COI. Thanks, Ian Cairns (talk) 14:30, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Honour Me[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Honour Me, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Honour Me

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Toddst1 (talk) 15:34, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Juarez City of Dreams[edit]

A tag has been placed on Juarez City of Dreams, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Toddst1 (talk) 15:35, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Forgotten Children of Congo[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Forgotten Children of Congo, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

The Forgotten Children of Congo

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Toddst1 (talk) 15:36, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 21st Century Male[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article 21st Century Male, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

21st Century Male

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Toddst1 (talk) 15:37, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Alex Tweddle[edit]

I have nominated Alex Tweddle, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Tweddle. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Toddst1 (talk) 15:54, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COI, again[edit]

Hello Mr. Tweddle, I see that you have already received a notification regarding our guideline on conflict of interest editing, which, if you have not already read, I would strongly encourage that you do. If you wish to improve the chances of your article at AfD, I would encourage you to post links to reliable, third-party sources on the AfD in order to verify your notability. Thanks. GlassCobra 10:03, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Honour Me has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Matt Deres (talk) 18:35, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to 21st Century Male constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Techman224^Talk 18:47, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to 21st Century Male. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Techman224^Talk 18:48, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of 21st Century Male[edit]

I have nominated 21st Century Male, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/21st Century Male. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Michig (talk) 19:12, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to The Forgotten Children of Congo. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Toddst1 (talk) 04:12, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]