User talk:Aubuh32

This is Aubuh32's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Aubuh32/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aubuh32! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Thanks for creating a draft!

Hello Aubuh32, welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Liance, and I've been editing here for a while. I wanted to thank you for submitting Draft:Heliophorus ila to WikiProject Articles for Creation and helping to grow the encyclopedia! We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

The Teahouse - ask Wikipedians for general editing help
Articles for Creation Help Desk - ask reviewers for draft article help
Creating your first article
Referencing for beginners
Wikipedia Manual of Style

I highly recommend visiting The Teahouse if you are unsure about anything Wiki related. It's a place where experienced editors answer questions and assist newcomers in the editing process. In addition, please do not hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome! I hope you enjoy your time here. ~Liance^talk 19:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:41, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just to clarify, it's not that you're not leaving edit summaries, you are, it's that they are not very helpful. An edit summary is meant to describe what you've done and/or why, so that others watching that page or reviewing its history later on can see what's happening. If you leave the same edit summary "Created a new user" each time, that doesn't tell anyone anything, especially when it in no way even relates to what you've done. Please make an effort to leave meaningful and correct edit summaries. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:45, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Did you actually read this, because you're still doing it? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:44, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing: I've just blocked this user as a sock. A previous user who created similar articles and updated their user page with the same kinds of unhelpful summaries was blocked for not changing their behavior. I strongly suspect this is the same person, but I can't remember who that user was. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:01, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know, @UtherSRG. The thought occurred to me, too, but a quick search of the SPI archive didn't find anything. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:13, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing: Indeed. I believe this is their first sock. The prior account was blocked purely for this behavior. I can't even remember if I was the blocker or if someone else did the block. I only remember the behavioral problem. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:24, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aaryajin88 - UtherSRG (talk) 19:23, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Heliophorus ila has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Heliophorus ila. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:48, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article and Template[edit]

to Make a Template called Template:Taxonomy/Velox try to make the higher classification: Velox belongs to the Tribe: Liturgusini. then rank it as a genus. give a link: Velox (mantis)|Velox. then use the extinct Parameter then type in: no. then make it Always displayed. then make the article: Velox (mantis). Aubuh32 (talk) 17:02, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Heliophorus ila has been accepted[edit]

Heliophorus ila, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:29, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Empty edit request on Template talk:Taxonomy/Rhinocerotidae[edit]

Hello. An edit request you recently made to Template talk:Taxonomy/Rhinocerotidae was empty and has been removed. Please see planning an edit request for more information on how to prepare a proper request. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you, Jamedeus (talk) 01:38, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. UtherSRG (talk) 12:59, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 20 2024: Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aubuh32 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Aubuh32 (talk) 13:53, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:58, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Aubuh32 (talk) 13:53, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpgordon: Can you fill out a pro forma SPI please and then tag me in it or list it here? I blocked based on my memory of the master's behavior. It would be good to have a record I can point back to. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aaryajin88. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 18:24, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]