Jump to content

User talk:Aurdivon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Aurdivon! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Theroadislong (talk) 14:20, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Your submission at Articles for creation: JMC Academy has been accepted

[edit]
JMC Academy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 07:15, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of JMC Academy for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article JMC Academy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JMC Academy (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed, Rosguill talk 20:53, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pepper Group (October 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 01:50, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Aurdivon! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 01:50, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pepper Group (November 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sagotreespirit was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sagotreespirit (talk) 14:20, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Pepper Group has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pepper Group. Thanks! — Sagotreespirit (talk) 08:50, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pepper Group (January 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 06:32, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Pepper Group has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission: I continue to see no references here that meet the requirements of WP:NCORP: references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements or inclusions in a list. DGG ( talk ) 02:27, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


It might possibly be relevant for you to read our rules on WP:COI, and make any necessary declarations. DGG ( talk ) 02:29, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DGG: Thank you for this. I've added the COI declaration on the draft talk page. Aurdivon (talk) 00:37, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

reply tomorrow

[edit]

I will reply tomorrow or the next day (Sat or Sun) DGG ( talk ) 05:27, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Please let me know if the references are okay. Aurdivon (talk) 23:51, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Pepper Group has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pepper Group. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 00:51, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pepper Group (April 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 14:47, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Pepper Group has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pepper Group. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 12:59, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pepper Group (September 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Noahfgodard was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Noahfgodard (talk) 19:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

[edit]

Hello, Aurdivon, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Fat Bro (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Megan☺️ Talk to the monster 14:28, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon

Hello Aurdivon. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Aurdivon. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Aurdivon|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Megan☺️ Talk to the monster 14:39, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on JMC Academy, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TarnishedPathtalk 14:00, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]