User talk:AusAvGeek

Aero (airline) - COI?

Hello, AusAvGeek. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Aero (airline), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. This also applies to your edits to airport articles indicating that the airports are served by Aero. Carguychris (talk) 18:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Carguychris. I am a uni student from Australia - I have zero connections to Aero, I was curious why no one has made a page since and decided to take the initiative to do so. I have plans to do all 'public charters' and make a page for them too, I am just stuck in uni work and only do so in the off time. Using primary sources have been just me being lazy. I thank and appreciate your concerns! AusAvGeek (talk) 00:08, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response, and compliments on an unusually well-written and formatted first-time article. The major reason I added the COI warning is that first-timers typically make glaring mistakes in article format or construction, and since you created a high-quality article about a company offering services to the public, I was concerned that you were a WP:SOCKPUPPET of an experienced editor being paid by Aero and trying to evade a ban for violating WP:PE. All that being said — I remain concerned that Aero (airline) fails WP:ORGDEPTH due to a lack of in-depth coverage in WP:SECONDARY sources. Passing mentions on travel websites of changes in a company's services may be useful if notability has already been established, but they are typically considered WP:RUNOFTHEMILL on their own, not to mention failing WP:NOTTRAVEL and WP:DEPTH.

Suggestion: consider expanding the air charter article to address public charters and listing operators there. I don't believe there is currently a good standalone explanation on Wikipedia of what a "public charter" is, and given the current USDOT effort to clamp down on this "loophole", which JSX stridently opposes (they've put up highway billboards in my local area), this is a good candidate for a Wikipedia editing effort. Plenty of quality secondary sources exist. Carguychris (talk) 14:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aero (airline)

The article Aero (airline) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ORGDEPTH due to a lack of in-depth references in WP:SECONDARY sources; the article relies almost entirely on WP:PRIMARY sources. Per ORGDEPTH and WP:NOTTRAVEL, trivial WP:ROTM mentions on travel websites of changes in a travel-related company's services are insufficient secondary sources for establishing notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Carguychris (talk) 14:29, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]