User talk:Autodesplanifica

This is Autodesplanifica's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miguel A. Martínez (urban sociologist) (October 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Johannes Maximilian were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please remove the external links from the body; also cite proper sources (most of the draft's text is unferenced, and all sources cited were composed by the subject).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miguel A. Martínez (urban sociologist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 20:32, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Miguel A. Martínez (urban sociologist) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Miguel A. Martínez (urban sociologist). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:10, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miguel A. Martínez (urban sociologist) (November 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Close but not quite enough independent, significant coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miguel A. Martínez (urban sociologist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 20:44, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Autodesplanifica! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 20:44, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miguel A. Martínez has been accepted[edit]

Miguel A. Martínez, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 14:03, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest[edit]

Hi I am wondering if you are connected in any way to the only subject of your wikipedia editing (Miguel A. Martínez)? If so that's not necessarily a problem, but it should be declared following WP:DISCLOSE. I am also wondering why you deleted the BLP tag which requested more sources with this edit? Cheers, Mujinga (talk) 12:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not. But why have you deleted most of the content? This is a case of vandalism. Autodesplanifica (talk) 15:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, it isn't vandalism to delete uncited or poorly referenced additions. This is what the template which you deleted on 26 March was trying to tell you. It says in part "Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediatelyfrom the article". Mujinga (talk) 20:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC) Mujinga (talk) 20:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]