User talk:Avani patel/cpix

Welcome!

Hello, Avani patel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Mushroom (Talk) 14:07, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Protected areas of the People's Republic of China[edit]

Have difficulty in citing any reference or source. All the available sources are in Chinese and derived from government decrees, notices, gazettes and news. You can be assured that all the information are correct and up-to-date. For instance, 19 newly established national nature reserves had been ratified by the State Council on January 14, 2008 and announced publicly on January 22, 2008.[1] Cybercicada (talk) 04:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it doesn't matter if its in Chinese. If it's Chinese that's still okay and can still be used. Bye./ Avani patel (talk) 11:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey[edit]

You realize that there are multiple "Tianning Temples" in China, don't you? And you realize there is more than one "Tianning Temple" in China that has a pagoda, right? As in China's now tallest pagoda at Tianning Temple in Changzhou, as opposed to Beijing? I hope that your moving of the thread Pagoda of Tianning Temple (Beijing) to simply Pagoda of Tianning Temple was simply a mistake. Please move it back, as I was intending on creating a disambiguation page for both temples and pagodas.--Pericles of Athens^Talk 19:15, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of think tanks in the United Kingdom[edit]

An editor has nominated List of think tanks in the United Kingdom, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of think tanks in the United Kingdom and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:00, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Avani patel/cpi[edit]

I'm afraid this violates the sources copyright. Could you please remove it? Or i'll just have to do it myself. Ironho lds 15:00, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:Avani patel/cpi[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:Avani patel/cpi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:User:Avani patel/cpi|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ironho lds 15:18, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of think tanks in the United Kingdom for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of think tanks in the United Kingdom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of think tanks in the United Kingdom (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ^Myname^isnot^dave (talk/contribs) 20:49, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]