User talk:AvilaPinheiro

Concern regarding Draft:Paulo Nogueira Batista Jr

Hello, AvilaPinheiro. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Paulo Nogueira Batista Jr, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:16, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Just following up on the note you left - if you want to keep editing the page and submit it, you can. This note is just to say that if the page remains untouched it will be deleted. firefly ( t · c ) 11:43, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Paulo Nogueira Batista Jr

Hello, AvilaPinheiro. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Paulo Nogueira Batista Jr".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:42, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paulo Nogueira Batista Jr has been accepted

Paulo Nogueira Batista Jr, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rkieferbaum (talk) 12:14, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi there! I have accepted your article, but I'd ask you to try to make it a little bit more neutral and encyclopaedic in tone. For instance, this section

"When Nogueira came to Washington DC, in 2007, the BRICS group (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) did not exist as a political reality. BRICS cooperation only began in 2008, at the initiative of Russia. Seven years later, the scenario was quite different."

would probably read better if it was something like

"Nogueira joined the IMF in Washington, DC, in 2007. A year later, in 2008, the BRICS cooperation began through an initiative by Russia. Over the course of a few years, the group gained enough strength that, in 2014, Nogueira proposed the creation of a bank..."

I would do this myself, but, as an editor, I usually prefer when people make suggestions to me so that I can improve my writing. Feel free to ping me if you need any help or have any questions. Cheers! Rkieferbaum (talk) 12:22, 25 September 2023 (UTC)