User talk:Awesomeone3624

Awesomeone3624, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

This user is a WWE fan.

Hi Awesomeone3624! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Criticize(song)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Criticize(song). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Criticize (song). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Criticize (song) – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. PamD 08:09, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Misery Loves My Company[edit]

The article Misery Loves My Company has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NSONG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:26, 18 October 2013 (UTC) Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:26, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of There's No Going Back (Sick Puppies 2013 song)[edit]

The article There's No Going Back (Sick Puppies 2013 song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NSONG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:29, 18 October 2013 (UTC) Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:29, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rick DeJesus (Singer)[edit]

Hello, Awesomeone3624. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Rick DeJesus (Singer), for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Rick DeJesus (Singer) to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:12, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Misery Loves My Company for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Misery Loves My Company is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Misery Loves My Company until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:01, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of There's No Going Back (Sick Puppies 2013 song) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article There's No Going Back (Sick Puppies 2013 song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/There's No Going Back (Sick Puppies 2013 song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:03, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Misery Loves My Company. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:23, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have you taken the time to read WP:GNG and WP:NSONG?

The first is the general notability guideline. It essentially states that a subject that is written about at length is sufficiently notable to have an article.

The second is specific to songs and has three simple criteria:

Has been ranked on national or significant music or sales charts.
Has won one or more significant awards or honors, such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury, Choice or Grammis award.
Has been independently released as a recording by several notable artists, bands, or groups.

It's not just that the article doesn't inform us of that criteria, it's that the subjects don't meet the criteria so you could never find sources to support the existence of the article. Please stop creating articles about songs that don't meet the criteria and stop contesting their deletion. It simply drags the process out. I'm not picking on your or your creations, I am just following the guidelines for creation. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:31, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And there is a difference between a PROD, which you may delete, and an Article for Deletion, which you may not delete. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:32, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Last Stand (Adelitas Way 2010 song) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Last Stand (Adelitas Way 2010 song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Last Stand (Adelitas Way 2010 song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:25, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with this edit to Last Stand (Adelitas Way 2010 song). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 18:36, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rick DeJesus (Singer), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:37, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Misery Loves My Company, you may be blocked from editing. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:38, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Collapse (song) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Collapse (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Collapse (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:44, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Criticize (Adelitas Way song) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Criticize (Adelitas Way song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticize (Adelitas Way song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:45, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alive (Adelitas Way song) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alive (Adelitas Way song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alive (Adelitas Way song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:49, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Dog On A leash, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 14:45, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dog On A leash[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dog On A leash, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ansh666 22:49, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alive (Adelitas Way 2012 song)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alive (Adelitas Way 2012 song), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sideways713 (talk) 11:12, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stuck (Adelitas Way album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bass (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Save the World PROD[edit]

Proposed deletion of Save the World (Adelitas Way song)[edit]

The article Save the World (Adelitas Way song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No notablity here. It didn't chart. Self-published or primary sources. Loudwire "articles" are glorified press releases.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 208.81.212.222 (talk) 01:05, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop reverting[edit]

Please stop reverting edits made with valid reason and explanations and explaining why you're reverting. 208.81.212.222 (talk) 21:20, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. Bobherry Userspace Talk to me! Stuff I have done 18:12, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Chalk Outline (song), you may be blocked from editing. You removed references and a comment explaining the situation. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:46, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Of Beauty and Rage. You removed maintenance templates. The date maintenance template is easy enough to replace. The citation needed templates was simply disruptive. Please explain your edits and don't remove templates without providing the requested information or explaining why. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:41, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts[edit]

Please stop edit warring on the page Stuck (Adelitas Way album), especially since my changes are improvements to the article. If you don't think they are, please explain on the articles talk page or to me directly. You may want to read WP:OWN, which says "no one has the right to act as though he or she is the owner of a particular page". Thank you. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:07, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Of Beauty and Rage[edit]

You removed citation needed tags from the labels and the recoding periods stating that 22 references existed. That material isn't clearly referenced in the existing, mostly charting, refs. Please add prose and references to support the information. Thanks. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:15, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — MusikAnimal ^talk 14:55, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Awesomeone3624. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Awesomeone3624. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]