User talk:B06Todd

Welcome, B06Todd, to Wikipedia!

Wikipedia is an enormous community filled with knowledge and opportunity. Wikipedia currently consists of at least 6,913,029 articles and 48,288,489 users, as well as many other resources. In joining, I hope you will benefit from this amazing supply of knowledge. I also hope you will consider having this community benefit from you and your expertise.

If you ever need help, feel free to contact me on my talk page. Also, placing {{helpme}} on your own talk page will notify advanced users that there is an unanswered question there.

I suggest looking over some of the pages I have listed below before you begin. Be sure to enjoy your new opportunity to learn and educate others!

--ENIAC (Talk) (Current Projects) 17:45, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Useful Links for New Wikipedians

These links will not cover everything; do not hesitate to contact me or someone else.

Basics of Wikipedia

With the following links, you can find out the basics of how Wikipedia works.

Personal Pages

Below are pages that are about you. You can use them to communicate with other Wikipedians, and help you with your edits.

Your coverage of disaster-related articles.

Just curious. Are all your additions on several disaster-related articles based on the Seconds From Disaster television series? ╫ ２５ ^{◀RingADing▶} 16:15, 1 November 2006 (UTC) ╫[reply]

Thanks for responding. The only issue of your additions is that they lack sources, which are essential in verifying the notability of the information provided in the additions. I'm not sure how to cite episodes of television program, but I've started with the Sampoong Department Store collapse article's reference section, which can serve as a rough guide on how to cite the SFD's television episodes. Hope that helps, and thanks again for replying. ╫ ２５ ^{◀RingADing▶} 17:01, 2 December 2006 (UTC) ╫[reply]

Re: New section on disaster articles

Well, timelines are OK (as stated in Wikipedia:Lists (stand-alone lists)#Appropriate topics for lists), as long as the articles aren't already explaining the same thing in other forms of text, including proses. In other words, you can add timelines as long as it's not redundant to what is already provided in the article (featured article that I've seen try to minimize the use of lists, including timelines, if possible). Hope that helps. ╫ ２５ ^{◀RingADing▶} 18:48, 4 December 2006 (UTC) ╫[reply]

USS Forrestal Fire Article

Hear Ye Hear Ye, i asked ages ago about opinions of editing the USS Forrestal Fire Article like i did with other disaster articles and got no response. should i leave it or is it still ok?

Proposed deletion of Critical Situation

The article Critical Situation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be notable. Nothing found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2020.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 22:19, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Critical Situation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Critical Situation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critical Situation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 01:42, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]